Clinical experience using Delta 4 phantom for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance in modern radiotherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Srivastava, R. P. [1 ,3 ]
De Wagter, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, C Heymanslaan 10,Radiotherapiepk, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Expt Canc Res, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ctr Hosp Mouscron, Radiotherapy Assoc Meuse Picardie, Mouscron, Belgium
关键词
gamma index; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; multi-leaf collimator; quality assurance; volumetric-modulated arc therapy;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396918000572
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose In advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the quality assurance (QA) process is essential. The aim of the study was to assure the treatment planning dose delivered during delivery of complex treatment plans. The QA standard is to perform patient-specific comparisons between planned doses and doses measured in a phantom. Materials and method The Delta 4 phantom (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) has been used in this study. This device consists of diode matrices in two orthogonal planes inserted in a cylindrical acrylic phantom. Each diode is sampled per beam pulse so that the dose distribution can be evaluated on segment-by-segment, beam-by-beam, or as a composite plan from a single set of measurements. Ninety-five simple and complex radiotherapy treatment plans for different pathologies, planned using a treatment planning system (TPS) were delivered to the QA device. The planned and measured dose distributions were then compared and analysed. The gamma index was determined for different pathologies. Results The evaluation was performed in terms of dose deviation, distance to agreement and gamma index passing rate. The measurements were in excellent agreement between with the calculated dose of the TPS and the QA device. Overall, good agreement was observed between measured and calculated doses in most cases with gamma values above 1 in >95% of measured points. Plan results for each test met the recommended dose goals. Conclusion The delivery of IMRT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans was verified to correspond well with calculated dose distributions for different pathologies. We found the Delta 4 device is accurate and reproducible. Although Delta4 appears to be a straightforward device for measuring dose and allows measure in real-time dosimetry QA, it is a complex device and careful quality control is required before its use.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BEST IN PHYSICS (THERAPY): 4D Dynamic Robotic Phantom System for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance in Real Time Tumor Tracking Radiotherapy
    Shinoki, T.
    Fujii, F.
    Fujimoto, K.
    Yuasa, Y.
    Uchara, T.
    Sera, T.
    Onizuka, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E630 - E630
  • [22] Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: A correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram
    Stasi, M.
    Bresciani, S.
    Miranti, A.
    Maggio, A.
    Sapino, V.
    Gabriele, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) : 7626 - 7634
  • [23] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Deformable Image Registrations Using Atlas for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer
    Alam, S. R.
    Meyer, S.
    Kuo, L.
    Hu, Y. C.
    Lu, W.
    Yorke, E. D.
    Rimner, A.
    Cervino, L. I.
    Zhang, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E582 - E582
  • [24] Simplification of head and neck volumetric modulated arc therapy patient-specific quality assurance, using a Delta4 PT
    Sasaki, Motoharu
    Sugimoto, Wataru
    Ikushima, Hitoshi
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2020, 25 (05) : 793 - 800
  • [25] Clinical experience on patient-specific quality assurance for CBCT-based online adaptive treatment plan
    Shen, Chenyang
    Chen, Liyuan
    Zhong, Xinran
    Gonzalez, Yesenia
    Visak, Justin
    Meng, Boyu
    Inam, Enobong
    Parsons, David
    Godley, Andrew
    Jiang, Steve
    Cai, Bin
    Lin, Mu-Han
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (04):
  • [26] Therapeutic dose prediction using score-based diffusion model for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance
    Yu, Xiuwen
    Lin, Jiabin
    Gong, Changfei
    Zhang, Minhui
    Luo, Xianyu
    Liu, Qiegen
    Zhang, Yun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 14
  • [27] Evaluation of Delta4DVH Anatomy in 3D Patient-Specific IMRT Quality Assurance
    Tang, Du
    Yang, Zhen
    Dai, Xunzhang
    Cao, Ying
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2020, 19
  • [28] Evaluation of PTW Seven29 for tomotherapy patient-specific quality assurance and comparison with ScandiDos Delta(4)
    Myers, Pamela
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Esquivel, Carlos
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Papanikolaou, Niko
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 37 (02) : 72 - 80
  • [29] Field size analysis of patient-specific quality assurance in scanned carbon ion radiotherapy
    Deng, Yu
    Wang, Qianxia
    Huang, Zhijie
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (11) : 6627 - 6633
  • [30] A novel dynamic robotic moving phantom system for patient-specific quality assurance in real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy
    Shiinoki, Takehiro
    Fujii, Fumitake
    Fujimoto, Koya
    Yuasa, Yuki
    Sera, Tatsuhiro
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (07): : 16 - 28