Clinical experience using Delta 4 phantom for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance in modern radiotherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Srivastava, R. P. [1 ,3 ]
De Wagter, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, C Heymanslaan 10,Radiotherapiepk, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Expt Canc Res, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ctr Hosp Mouscron, Radiotherapy Assoc Meuse Picardie, Mouscron, Belgium
关键词
gamma index; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; multi-leaf collimator; quality assurance; volumetric-modulated arc therapy;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396918000572
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose In advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the quality assurance (QA) process is essential. The aim of the study was to assure the treatment planning dose delivered during delivery of complex treatment plans. The QA standard is to perform patient-specific comparisons between planned doses and doses measured in a phantom. Materials and method The Delta 4 phantom (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) has been used in this study. This device consists of diode matrices in two orthogonal planes inserted in a cylindrical acrylic phantom. Each diode is sampled per beam pulse so that the dose distribution can be evaluated on segment-by-segment, beam-by-beam, or as a composite plan from a single set of measurements. Ninety-five simple and complex radiotherapy treatment plans for different pathologies, planned using a treatment planning system (TPS) were delivered to the QA device. The planned and measured dose distributions were then compared and analysed. The gamma index was determined for different pathologies. Results The evaluation was performed in terms of dose deviation, distance to agreement and gamma index passing rate. The measurements were in excellent agreement between with the calculated dose of the TPS and the QA device. Overall, good agreement was observed between measured and calculated doses in most cases with gamma values above 1 in >95% of measured points. Plan results for each test met the recommended dose goals. Conclusion The delivery of IMRT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans was verified to correspond well with calculated dose distributions for different pathologies. We found the Delta 4 device is accurate and reproducible. Although Delta4 appears to be a straightforward device for measuring dose and allows measure in real-time dosimetry QA, it is a complex device and careful quality control is required before its use.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of Characteristics of Phantomless Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using PerFRACTIONTM
    Shin, J.
    Kim, S. J.
    Kim, H.
    Lee, H.
    Ahn, Y. C.
    Pyo, H. R.
    Park, W.
    Kim, H.
    Park, H. C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7958 - 7958
  • [32] Design and additive manufacture of patient-specific head phantom for radiotherapy
    Lin, Brandon Zhan Hong
    Zhang, Ee Teng
    Ng, Huiyan
    Tan, Mervin Yen Leong
    Soh, Zheng Han
    Wong, Yun Ming
    Chua, Clifford Ghee Ann
    Lew, Kah Seng
    Pang, Eric Pei Ping
    Tan, Hong Qi
    Park, Sung Yong
    Ng, Bing Feng
    Koh, Wei Yang Calvin
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2025, 252
  • [33] Clinical implementation of PerFRACTION™ for pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance
    Sang-Won Kang
    Boram Lee
    Changhoon Song
    Keun-Yong Eeom
    Bum-Sup Jang
    In Ah Kim
    Jae-Sung Kim
    Jin-Beom Chung
    Seonghee Kang
    Woong Cho
    Dong-Suk Shin
    Jin-Young Kim
    Minsoo Chun
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2022, 80 : 516 - 525
  • [34] Clinical implementation of PerFRACTION™ for pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance
    Kang, Sang-Won
    Lee, Boram
    Song, Changhoon
    Eeom, Keun-Yong
    Jang, Bum-Sup
    Kim, In Ah
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Kang, Seonghee
    Cho, Woong
    Shin, Dong-Suk
    Kim, Jin-Young
    Chun, Minsoo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 80 (06) : 516 - 525
  • [35] Improvement in SRS Commission and Patient-Specific Quality Assurance
    Ding, M.
    Heard, D.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [36] Evaluation of a novel patient-specific quality assurance phantom for robotic single-isocentre, multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy
    Xu, Qianyi
    Vinogradskiy, Yevgeniy
    Grimm, Jimm
    Nie, Wei
    Dupre, Pamela
    Chawla, Ashish K.
    Bajaj, Gopal
    Yang, Haihua
    Lacouture, Tamara
    Fan, Jiajin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1155): : 660 - 667
  • [37] Automated Patient-specific Quality Assurance for Automated Segmentation of Organs at Risk in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy
    Wang, Yixuan
    Hu, Jiang
    Chen, Lixin
    Zhang, Dandan
    Zhu, Jinhan
    CANCER CONTROL, 2025, 32
  • [38] Usefulness of a new online patient-specific quality assurance system for respiratory-gated radiotherapy
    Kurosawa, Tomoyuki
    Tachibana, Hidenobu
    Moriya, Shunsuke
    Miyakawa, Shin
    Nishio, Teiji
    Sato, Masanori
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 43 : 63 - 72
  • [39] A comparison of three-film analysis software for stereotactic radiotherapy patient-specific quality assurance
    Buddhavarapu, Athreya
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (03):
  • [40] Automated patient-specific IMRT quality assurance using exit detector data
    Seibert, R.
    Ramsey, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2168 - 2168