Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation of Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study With Special Evaluation of Fracture Level

被引:145
|
作者
Schneider, Matthias [1 ]
Erasmus, Francois
Gerlach, Klaus Louis [2 ]
Kuhlisch, Eberhard [3 ]
Loukota, Richard A. [4 ]
Rasse, Michael [5 ]
Schubert, Johannes [6 ]
Terheyden, Hendrik [7 ]
Eckelt, Uwe
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Clin Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Inst Med Informat & Biometry, Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Leeds, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Univ Halle, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Halle, Germany
[7] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kassel, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.107
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This randomized, clinical multicenter trial investigated the treatment outcomes of displaced condylar fractures, and whether radiographic fracture level was a prognostic factor in therapeutic decision-making between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed reduction and mandibulomaxillary fixation (CRMMF). Patients and Methods: Sixty-six patients with 79 displaced fractures (deviation of 100 to 450, or shortening of the ascending ramus :2 mm) of the condylar process of the mandible at 7 clinical centers were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to CRMMF (n = 30 patients) or ORIF (n = 36 patients) treatment. The following parameters were measured 6 months after the trauma. Clinical parameters included mouth opening, protrusion, and laterotrusion. Radiographic parameters included level of the fracture, deviation of the fragment, and shortening of the ascending ramus. Subjective parameters included pain (according to a visual analogue scale), discomfort, and Subjective functional impairment with a mandibular functional impairment questionnaire. Results: The difference in average mouth opening was 12 mm (P <= .001) between both treatment groups. The average pain level (visual analogue scale from 0 to 100) was 25 after CRMMF, and 1 after ORIF (P <= .001). In 53 unilateral fractures, better functional results were observed for ORIF compared with CRMMF, irrespective of fracture level (condylar base, neck, or intracapsular head). Unexpectedly, the subjective discomfort level decreased with ascending level of the fracture. In patients with bilateral condylar fractures, ORIF was especially advantageous. Conclusion: Fractures with a deviation of 10 degrees to 45 degrees, or a shortening of the ascending ramus 2 mm, should be treated with ORIF, irrespective of level of the fracture. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2537 / 2544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TREATMENT OF OPEN ANKLE FRACTURES - IMMEDIATE INTERNAL-FIXATION VERSUS CLOSED IMMOBILIZATION AND DELAYED FIXATION
    BRAY, TJ
    ENDICOTT, M
    CAPRA, SE
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1989, (240) : 47 - 52
  • [42] Prospective evaluation of closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated mandibular condyle fractures versus open reposition and rigid fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures in children
    Landes, Constantin A.
    Day, Kai
    Glasl, Bettina
    Ludwig, Bjoern
    Sader, Robert
    Kovacs, Adorjan F.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (06) : 1184 - 1193
  • [43] Application Comparison of Closed Reduction with Hollow Screw Internal Fixation and Open Reduction with Special Shaped Plate Internal Fixation in Calcaneal Fracture
    Zhai, L.
    Huang, K.
    Lin, B.
    Guo, Q.
    Liu, Y.
    Shen, L.
    Ma, G.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 83 : 155 - 160
  • [44] Comparison of closed percutaneous screw reduction versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of frontal sinus fractures: A retrospective study
    Kaplan, Guven Ozan
    Kucuk, Kutluhan Yusuf
    Kara, Murat
    Calis, Mert
    Tuncbilek, Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 52 (06) : 743 - 747
  • [45] AN ACCURATE METHOD FOR OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL-FIXATION OF HIGH AND LOW CONDYLAR PROCESS FRACTURES
    ALEXANDER, R
    SU, JY
    STARK, MM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (08) : 808 - 812
  • [46] Comparison of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Reduction and Maxillomandibular Fixation for the Treatment of Gunshot Injuries of Mandible
    Channar, Kashif Ali
    Dal, Abdul Qadir
    Safia
    Warriach, Riaz Ahamed
    JOURNAL OF THE LIAQUAT UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, 2011, 10 (03): : 168 - 173
  • [47] Comparison of outcome of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment in pediatric mandible fractures-a retrospective study
    Bansal, Adity
    Yadav, Poonam
    Bhutia, Ongkila
    Roychoudhury, Ajoy
    Bhalla, Ashu Seith
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 49 (03) : 196 - 205
  • [48] Prospective evaluation of a pragmatic treatment rationale: open reduction and internal fixation of displaced and dislocated condyle and condylar head fractures and closed reduction of non-displaced, non-dislocated fractures Part II: high condylar and condylar head fractures
    Landes, CA
    Lipphardt, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 35 (02) : 115 - 126
  • [49] Treatment Delay Impact on Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review
    Stone, Nicholas
    Corneman, Alex
    Sandre, Anthony R.
    Farrokhyar, Forough
    Thoma, Achilleas
    Cooper, Michael J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [50] Reply to "Open reduction and internal fixation obtains favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes for pediatric mandibular condylar fractures"
    Bertin, H.
    Grimaud, F.
    Corre, P.
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (01) : 121 - 122