Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation of Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study With Special Evaluation of Fracture Level

被引:145
|
作者
Schneider, Matthias [1 ]
Erasmus, Francois
Gerlach, Klaus Louis [2 ]
Kuhlisch, Eberhard [3 ]
Loukota, Richard A. [4 ]
Rasse, Michael [5 ]
Schubert, Johannes [6 ]
Terheyden, Hendrik [7 ]
Eckelt, Uwe
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Clin Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Inst Med Informat & Biometry, Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Leeds, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Univ Halle, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Halle, Germany
[7] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kassel, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.107
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This randomized, clinical multicenter trial investigated the treatment outcomes of displaced condylar fractures, and whether radiographic fracture level was a prognostic factor in therapeutic decision-making between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed reduction and mandibulomaxillary fixation (CRMMF). Patients and Methods: Sixty-six patients with 79 displaced fractures (deviation of 100 to 450, or shortening of the ascending ramus :2 mm) of the condylar process of the mandible at 7 clinical centers were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to CRMMF (n = 30 patients) or ORIF (n = 36 patients) treatment. The following parameters were measured 6 months after the trauma. Clinical parameters included mouth opening, protrusion, and laterotrusion. Radiographic parameters included level of the fracture, deviation of the fragment, and shortening of the ascending ramus. Subjective parameters included pain (according to a visual analogue scale), discomfort, and Subjective functional impairment with a mandibular functional impairment questionnaire. Results: The difference in average mouth opening was 12 mm (P <= .001) between both treatment groups. The average pain level (visual analogue scale from 0 to 100) was 25 after CRMMF, and 1 after ORIF (P <= .001). In 53 unilateral fractures, better functional results were observed for ORIF compared with CRMMF, irrespective of fracture level (condylar base, neck, or intracapsular head). Unexpectedly, the subjective discomfort level decreased with ascending level of the fracture. In patients with bilateral condylar fractures, ORIF was especially advantageous. Conclusion: Fractures with a deviation of 10 degrees to 45 degrees, or a shortening of the ascending ramus 2 mm, should be treated with ORIF, irrespective of level of the fracture. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2537 / 2544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of Gunshot Injuries of Mandible with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Closed Reduction and Maxillo-mandibular Fixation
    Muddassar, Muhammad
    Arshad, Rizwan
    Rabbani, Sarah
    Qureshi, Imran S.
    Khattak, Imran K.
    Rana, Zahoor
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [32] CLOSED REDUCTION AND INTERNAL-FIXATION VERSUS OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL-FIXATION FOR DISPLACED OBLIQUE PROXIMAL PHALANGEAL FRACTURES
    EATON, RG
    HASTINGS, H
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1989, 12 (06) : 911 - 916
  • [33] Evaluation of Complications After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condylar Base and Neck Fractures Using Trapezoidal Plates
    Smolka, Wenko
    Liokatis, Paris
    Cornelius, Carl-Peter
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (05) : 1287 - 1290
  • [34] Comparison of closed and open reduction internal fixation of acutely displaced unstable lateral humeral condylar fractures in children: a prospective cohort study
    Kotb, Mohamed Ismail
    Alagamy, Sherif A.
    Saleh, Mohamed Khalid
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2021, 32 (03): : 261 - 265
  • [35] Functional Outcomes for Unstable Distal Radial Fractures Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Rozental, Tamara D.
    Blazar, Philip E.
    Franko, Orrin I.
    Chacko, Aron T.
    Earp, Brandon E.
    Day, Charles S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (08): : 1837 - 1846
  • [36] Inter Maxillary Fixation Versus Open Reduction for the Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A Comparative Evaluation
    Nasreen, Saba
    Bansal, Anupam
    Rela, Rathi
    Rai, Gaurav
    Sah, Ram Prasad
    Gupta, Abhinav Raj
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (05): : 268 - 271
  • [37] Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Percutaneous Pinning With External Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
    Grewal, Ruby
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    King, Graham J. W.
    Faber, Kenneth J.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 36A (12): : 1899 - 1906
  • [38] Open reduction and internal fixation obtains favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes for pediatric mandibular condylar fractures
    Zhang, L.
    Wang, Y.
    Shao, X.
    Chen, J.
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [39] Outcomes of Open Versus Closed Treatment of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Singh, Virendra
    Bhagol, Amrish
    Goel, Mahesh
    Kumar, Ish
    Verma, Ajay
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (06) : 1304 - 1309
  • [40] Closed versus open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: A meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies
    Berner, Tanja
    Essig, Harald
    Schumann, Paul
    Blumer, Michael
    Lanzer, Martin
    Ruecker, Martin
    Gander, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (08) : 1404 - 1408