Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation of Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study With Special Evaluation of Fracture Level

被引:145
|
作者
Schneider, Matthias [1 ]
Erasmus, Francois
Gerlach, Klaus Louis [2 ]
Kuhlisch, Eberhard [3 ]
Loukota, Richard A. [4 ]
Rasse, Michael [5 ]
Schubert, Johannes [6 ]
Terheyden, Hendrik [7 ]
Eckelt, Uwe
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Clin Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Inst Med Informat & Biometry, Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Leeds, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Univ Halle, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Halle, Germany
[7] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kassel, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.107
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This randomized, clinical multicenter trial investigated the treatment outcomes of displaced condylar fractures, and whether radiographic fracture level was a prognostic factor in therapeutic decision-making between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed reduction and mandibulomaxillary fixation (CRMMF). Patients and Methods: Sixty-six patients with 79 displaced fractures (deviation of 100 to 450, or shortening of the ascending ramus :2 mm) of the condylar process of the mandible at 7 clinical centers were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to CRMMF (n = 30 patients) or ORIF (n = 36 patients) treatment. The following parameters were measured 6 months after the trauma. Clinical parameters included mouth opening, protrusion, and laterotrusion. Radiographic parameters included level of the fracture, deviation of the fragment, and shortening of the ascending ramus. Subjective parameters included pain (according to a visual analogue scale), discomfort, and Subjective functional impairment with a mandibular functional impairment questionnaire. Results: The difference in average mouth opening was 12 mm (P <= .001) between both treatment groups. The average pain level (visual analogue scale from 0 to 100) was 25 after CRMMF, and 1 after ORIF (P <= .001). In 53 unilateral fractures, better functional results were observed for ORIF compared with CRMMF, irrespective of fracture level (condylar base, neck, or intracapsular head). Unexpectedly, the subjective discomfort level decreased with ascending level of the fracture. In patients with bilateral condylar fractures, ORIF was especially advantageous. Conclusion: Fractures with a deviation of 10 degrees to 45 degrees, or a shortening of the ascending ramus 2 mm, should be treated with ORIF, irrespective of level of the fracture. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2537 / 2544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A preauricular long-corniform approach for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures
    Zhou, Jian-Hong
    Ren, Chang-Qun
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (05) : 359 - 366
  • [22] Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Strategy For Treatment of Comminuted Mandibular Fracture
    Ma, Yanbo
    Hao, Xiuyan
    Zhao, Yantao
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (01) : E90 - E92
  • [23] Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condylar Base and Neck Fractures Using Strut Plates
    Lechler, Carolin
    Probst, Florian
    Cornelius, Carl-Peter
    Smolka, Wenko
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (07) : 1494 - 1503
  • [24] Open Reduction with Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Retrospective Study
    Bouchard, Carl
    Mansouri, Masoud
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 83
  • [25] Closed reduction transarticular Kirschner wire fixation versus open reduction internal fixation in the treatment of Bennett's fracture dislocation
    Lutz, M
    Sailer, R
    Zimmermann, R
    Gabl, M
    Ulmer, H
    Pechlaner, S
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2003, 28B (02): : 142 - 147
  • [26] Open reduction and internal fixation compared to closed reduction and external fixation in distal radial fractures A randomized study of 50 patients
    Abramo, Antonio
    Kopylov, Philippe
    Geijer, Mats
    Tagil, Magnus
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2009, 80 (04) : 478 - 485
  • [27] Percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation in treatment of medial malleolus fracture
    Abdelrazek, Mahmoud Elsayed Ali
    Hegazy, Mohammed Osama
    Zakaria, Ahmed Ramy
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2024, 35 (04): : 164 - 170
  • [28] Closed reduction external fixator fixation versus open reduction internal fixation in the patients with Bennett fracture dislocation
    Li Zhongzhe
    Guo Yang
    Tian Wen
    Tian Guanglei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (22) : 3902 - 3905
  • [29] Closed reduction external fixator fixation versus open reduction internal fixation in the patients with Bennett fracture dislocation
    Li Zhongzhe
    Guo Yang
    Tian Wen
    Tian Guanglei
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2014, (22) : 3902 - 3905
  • [30] Comparative study of the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and external fixation in treating distal radius fracture
    Duan, Weixuan
    Han, Xiaojuan
    Wang, Jianchuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (12): : 13863 - 13869