Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation of Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study With Special Evaluation of Fracture Level

被引:145
|
作者
Schneider, Matthias [1 ]
Erasmus, Francois
Gerlach, Klaus Louis [2 ]
Kuhlisch, Eberhard [3 ]
Loukota, Richard A. [4 ]
Rasse, Michael [5 ]
Schubert, Johannes [6 ]
Terheyden, Hendrik [7 ]
Eckelt, Uwe
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Clin Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Inst Med Informat & Biometry, Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Leeds, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Univ Halle, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Halle, Germany
[7] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kassel, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.107
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This randomized, clinical multicenter trial investigated the treatment outcomes of displaced condylar fractures, and whether radiographic fracture level was a prognostic factor in therapeutic decision-making between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed reduction and mandibulomaxillary fixation (CRMMF). Patients and Methods: Sixty-six patients with 79 displaced fractures (deviation of 100 to 450, or shortening of the ascending ramus :2 mm) of the condylar process of the mandible at 7 clinical centers were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to CRMMF (n = 30 patients) or ORIF (n = 36 patients) treatment. The following parameters were measured 6 months after the trauma. Clinical parameters included mouth opening, protrusion, and laterotrusion. Radiographic parameters included level of the fracture, deviation of the fragment, and shortening of the ascending ramus. Subjective parameters included pain (according to a visual analogue scale), discomfort, and Subjective functional impairment with a mandibular functional impairment questionnaire. Results: The difference in average mouth opening was 12 mm (P <= .001) between both treatment groups. The average pain level (visual analogue scale from 0 to 100) was 25 after CRMMF, and 1 after ORIF (P <= .001). In 53 unilateral fractures, better functional results were observed for ORIF compared with CRMMF, irrespective of fracture level (condylar base, neck, or intracapsular head). Unexpectedly, the subjective discomfort level decreased with ascending level of the fracture. In patients with bilateral condylar fractures, ORIF was especially advantageous. Conclusion: Fractures with a deviation of 10 degrees to 45 degrees, or a shortening of the ascending ramus 2 mm, should be treated with ORIF, irrespective of level of the fracture. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2537 / 2544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of life in treatment of mandibular fractures using closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation in comparison with open reduction and internal fixation - A randomized prospective study
    Omeje, Kevin U.
    Rana, Majeed
    Adebola, Adetokunbo R.
    Efunkoya, Akinwale A.
    Olasoji, Hector O.
    Purcz, Nicolai
    Gellrich, Nils-Claudius
    Rana, Madiha
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (08) : 1821 - 1826
  • [2] Endoscope-Assisted Transoral Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures-A Prospective Double-Center Study
    Kokemueller, Horst
    Konstantinovic, Vitomir S.
    Barth, Enno-Ludwig
    Goldhahn, Sabine
    von See, Constantin
    Tavassol, Frank
    Essig, Harald
    Gellrich, Nils-Claudius
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (02) : 384 - 395
  • [3] Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process - A prospective Randomized multi-centre study
    Eckelt, U.
    Schneider, M.
    Erasmus, F.
    Gerlach, K. L.
    Kuhlisch, E.
    Loukota, R.
    Rasse, M.
    Schubert, J.
    Terheyden, H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XVIII CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR CRANIO-MAXILLO FACIAL SURGERY, 2006, : 99 - +
  • [4] Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process - a prospective randomized multi-centre study
    Eckelt, Uwe
    Schneider, Matthias
    Erasmus, Francois
    Gerlach, Klaus Louis
    Kuhlisch, Eberhard
    Loukota, Richard
    Rasse, Michael
    Schubert, Johannes
    Terheyden, Hendrik
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 34 (05) : 306 - 314
  • [5] A comparative evaluation of rhytidectomy versus retromandibular approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of mandibular condylar fractures
    Saikrishna D.
    Shetty S.K.
    Reshma V.P.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2009, 8 (1) : 13 - 16
  • [6] Does Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Yield Better Outcomes Over Closed Reduction of Mandibular Condylar Fractures?
    Rikhotso, Risimati Ephraim
    Reyneke, Johan P.
    Nel, Marietha
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 80 (10) : 1641 - 1654
  • [7] European multicenter prospective analysis of the use of maxillomandibular fixation for mandibular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation
    Roccia, Fabio
    Sobrero, Federica
    Raveggi, Elisa
    Rabufetti, Alessandro
    Scolozzi, Paolo
    Dubron, Kathia
    Politis, Constantinus
    Ganasouli, Dimitra
    Zanakis, Stylianos N.
    Jelovac, Drago
    Konstantinovic, Vitomir S.
    Birk, Anze
    Vesnaver, Ales
    Knezevic, Predrag
    Dediol, Emil
    Kordic, Mario
    Sivric, Anamaria
    Rizvi, Ali O.
    Laverick, Sean
    Vilaplana, Nil Valentines
    Roig, Antonio Mari
    Yilmaz, Utku Nezih
    Goetzinger, Maximilian
    Bottini, Gian Battista
    Ramieri, Guglielmo
    Derkus, Fatma Eris
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (01)
  • [8] European multicenter prospective analysis of the use of maxillomandibular fixation for mandibular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation
    Sobrero, Federica
    Roccia, Fabio
    Zavattero, Emanuele
    Raveggi, Elisa
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (03)
  • [9] Open reduction internal fixation versus external fixation with limited internal fixation for displaced comminuted closed pilon fractures: A randomised prospective study
    Ahmed, Rayan
    Ahmed, Kotb
    Elhussein, Elmoatasem M.
    Shady, Samir
    Tamer, El-Sobky A.
    Ezzat, El-Hawi
    Mahmoud, Mahran
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 24 : 84 - 89
  • [10] Advances in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Multiple Mandibular Fractures with Condylar Involvement
    Bottini, Gian Battista
    Gaggl, Alexander
    Brandtner, Christian
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (02) : 348e - 350e