Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure

被引:66
|
作者
Cozzolino, Mauro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia [1 ]
Pellicer, Antonio [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Garrido, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] IVI Fdn, IVIRMA, Ave Fernando Abril Martorell,106 Torre A, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynaecol & Reprod Sci, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Tulipan, Madrid 28933, Spain
[4] IVI Roma, IVIRMA, Largo Ildebrando Pizzetti 1, I-00197 Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Valencia, Dept Pediat Obstet & Gynecol, Av Blasco Ibanez 15, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
Recurrent implantation failure; Endometrial receptivity; Window of implantation; PGT-A; Infertility; Embryo transfer; ERA test; Pregnancy; Implantation rate; Ongoing pregnancy rate; IVF cycles; PERSONALIZED EMBRYO-TRANSFER; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; MATERNAL AGE; LIVE BIRTH; ARRAY; REPRODUCIBILITY; HYBRIDIZATION; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-020-01948-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in patients with severe and moderate recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Design A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in patients who failed to achieve implantation following transfer of 3 or more or 5 or more embryos in at least three single embryo transfers; patients were classified as moderate or severe RIF, respectively. Patients with previous RIF were compared based on the testing they received: PGT-A, ERA, or PGT-A+ERA versus a control group with no testing. Mean implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were considered primary outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed and adjusted ORs were calculated to control possible bias. Results Of the 2110 patients belonging to the moderate RIF group, those who underwent transfer of euploid embryos after PGT-A had a higher implantation rate than those who did not. Additionally, the PGT-A group had a significantly higher rate of ongoing pregnancy. The same outcomes measured for the 488 patients in the severe RIF group did not reveal any statistically significant improvements. The use of the ERA test did not appear to significantly improve outcomes in either group. Conclusions PGT-A may be beneficial for patients with moderate recurrent implantation failure but not for severe cases. At its current level of development, ERA does not appear to be clinically useful for patients with RIF.
引用
收藏
页码:2989 / 2997
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure
    Mauro Cozzolino
    Patricia Diaz-Gimeno
    Antonio Pellicer
    Nicolas Garrido
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2020, 37 : 2989 - 2997
  • [2] No endometrial receptivity assay of enlightenment for recurrent implantation failure
    Bosch, Allison
    Hipp, Heather S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (02) : 239 - 240
  • [3] Evaluation of endometrial receptivity in recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure
    Canan, Sultan
    Inan, Mehmet Arda
    Erdem, Ahmet
    Demirdag, Erhan
    Gunduz, Mualla Ilknur
    Erdem, Ozlem
    Erdem, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 21 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [4] Evaluation of endometrial receptivity and implantation failure
    Bui, Anthony H.
    Timmons, Douglas B.
    Young, Steven L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 34 (03) : 107 - 113
  • [5] Evaluation of embryo aneuploidy (PGT-A) and endometrial receptivity (ERA) testing in patients with recurrent implantation failure in ICSI cycles
    Fodina, Violeta
    Dudorova, Alesja
    Erenpreiss, Juris
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 : 17 - 20
  • [6] Is it necessary for young patients with recurrent implantation failure to undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy?
    Du, Yulin
    Guan, Yichun
    Li, Na
    Shi, Congxing
    Zhang, Yongjie
    Ren, Bingnan
    Liu, Jing
    Lou, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [7] Comparison of Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) with Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) versus ERA alone in improving outcomes in Recurrent implantation failure
    Kaur, S.
    Gedela, D. R.
    Mantravadi, K. C.
    Yakasiri, V. S.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [8] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated implantation failure
    Caglar, GS
    Asimakopoulos, B
    Nikolettos, N
    Diedrich, K
    Al-Hasani, S
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2005, 10 (03) : 381 - 388
  • [9] Factors influencing endometrial receptivity in women with recurrent implantation failure
    Opuchlik, Katarzyna
    Pankiewicz, Katarzyna
    Pierzynski, Piotr
    Sierdzinski, Janusz
    Aleksejeva, Elina
    Salumets, Andres
    Issat, Tadeusz
    Laudanski, Piotr
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [10] Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan
    Ohara, Yasuhiro
    Matsubayashi, Hidehiko
    Suzuki, Yosuke
    Takaya, Yukiko
    Yamaguchi, Kohei
    Doshida, Masakazu
    Takeuchi, Takumi
    Ishikawa, Tomomoto
    Handa, Mika
    Miyake, Tatsuya
    Takiuchi, Tsuyoshi
    Kimura, Tadashi
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 21 (01)