Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure

被引:66
|
作者
Cozzolino, Mauro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia [1 ]
Pellicer, Antonio [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Garrido, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] IVI Fdn, IVIRMA, Ave Fernando Abril Martorell,106 Torre A, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynaecol & Reprod Sci, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Tulipan, Madrid 28933, Spain
[4] IVI Roma, IVIRMA, Largo Ildebrando Pizzetti 1, I-00197 Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Valencia, Dept Pediat Obstet & Gynecol, Av Blasco Ibanez 15, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
Recurrent implantation failure; Endometrial receptivity; Window of implantation; PGT-A; Infertility; Embryo transfer; ERA test; Pregnancy; Implantation rate; Ongoing pregnancy rate; IVF cycles; PERSONALIZED EMBRYO-TRANSFER; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; MATERNAL AGE; LIVE BIRTH; ARRAY; REPRODUCIBILITY; HYBRIDIZATION; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-020-01948-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in patients with severe and moderate recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Design A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in patients who failed to achieve implantation following transfer of 3 or more or 5 or more embryos in at least three single embryo transfers; patients were classified as moderate or severe RIF, respectively. Patients with previous RIF were compared based on the testing they received: PGT-A, ERA, or PGT-A+ERA versus a control group with no testing. Mean implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were considered primary outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed and adjusted ORs were calculated to control possible bias. Results Of the 2110 patients belonging to the moderate RIF group, those who underwent transfer of euploid embryos after PGT-A had a higher implantation rate than those who did not. Additionally, the PGT-A group had a significantly higher rate of ongoing pregnancy. The same outcomes measured for the 488 patients in the severe RIF group did not reveal any statistically significant improvements. The use of the ERA test did not appear to significantly improve outcomes in either group. Conclusions PGT-A may be beneficial for patients with moderate recurrent implantation failure but not for severe cases. At its current level of development, ERA does not appear to be clinically useful for patients with RIF.
引用
收藏
页码:2989 / 2997
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy helps to achieve a live birth with fewer transfer cycles for the blastocyst FET patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure
    Sidong Wang
    Luochuan Liu
    Minyue Ma
    Hui Wang
    Yibing Han
    Xinmeng Guo
    William S. B. Yeung
    Yanfei Cheng
    Huiting Zhang
    Fengming Dong
    Bolun Zhang
    Ye Tian
    Jiangnan Song
    Hongmei Peng
    Yuanqing Yao
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 308 : 599 - 610
  • [42] The use of propensity score matching to assess the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Yu, S.
    Zhang, Y.
    Li, N.
    Su, Z.
    Li, W.
    Lou, H.
    Guan, Y.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 : I335 - I335
  • [43] The use of propensity score matching to assess the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Yu, Shuang
    Zhang, Yongjie
    Li, Na
    Su, Zhuolun
    Li, Wenjing
    Lou, Hua
    Guan, Yichun
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [44] Endometrial miRNome profile according to the receptivity status and implantation failure
    Drissennek, Loubna
    Baron, Chloe
    Brouillet, Sophie
    Entezami, Frida
    Hamamah, Samir
    Haouzi, Delphine
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2022, 25 (02) : 356 - 368
  • [45] The role of endometrial function test (EFT®) in recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in IVF
    Johnston-MacAnanny, E. B.
    Kliman, H. J.
    Maier, D. B.
    Nulsen, J. C.
    Benadiva, C. A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S162 - S162
  • [46] Predictive value of repeated IVF-ET cycles with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening of embryos among women with recurrent implantation failure.
    Pagidas, K
    Ying, Y
    Keefe, D
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 : S36 - S37
  • [47] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages
    Platteau, P
    Staessen, C
    Michiels, A
    Van Steirteghem, A
    Liebaers, I
    Devroey, P
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (02) : 393 - 397
  • [48] Genetic counseling for men with recurrent pregnancy loss or recurrent implantation failure due to abnormal sperm chromosomal aneuploidy
    Taylor P. Kohn
    Jaden R. Kohn
    Sandra Darilek
    Ranjith Ramasamy
    Larry Lipshultz
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2016, 33 : 571 - 576
  • [49] Genetic counseling for men with recurrent pregnancy loss or recurrent implantation failure due to abnormal sperm chromosomal aneuploidy
    Kohn, Taylor P.
    Kohn, Jaden R.
    Darilek, Sandra
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Lipshultz, Larry
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2016, 33 (05) : 571 - 576
  • [50] Molecular Determinants of Uterine Receptivity: Comparison of Successful Implantation, Recurrent Miscarriage, and Recurrent Implantation Failure
    Guenther, Veronika
    Allahqoli, Leila
    Deenadayal-Mettler, Anupama
    Maass, Nicolai
    Mettler, Liselotte
    Gitas, Georgios
    Andresen, Kristin
    Schubert, Melanie
    Ackermann, Johannes
    von Otte, Soeren
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (24)