Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure

被引:66
|
作者
Cozzolino, Mauro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia [1 ]
Pellicer, Antonio [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Garrido, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] IVI Fdn, IVIRMA, Ave Fernando Abril Martorell,106 Torre A, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynaecol & Reprod Sci, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Tulipan, Madrid 28933, Spain
[4] IVI Roma, IVIRMA, Largo Ildebrando Pizzetti 1, I-00197 Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Valencia, Dept Pediat Obstet & Gynecol, Av Blasco Ibanez 15, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
Recurrent implantation failure; Endometrial receptivity; Window of implantation; PGT-A; Infertility; Embryo transfer; ERA test; Pregnancy; Implantation rate; Ongoing pregnancy rate; IVF cycles; PERSONALIZED EMBRYO-TRANSFER; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; MATERNAL AGE; LIVE BIRTH; ARRAY; REPRODUCIBILITY; HYBRIDIZATION; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-020-01948-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in patients with severe and moderate recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Design A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in patients who failed to achieve implantation following transfer of 3 or more or 5 or more embryos in at least three single embryo transfers; patients were classified as moderate or severe RIF, respectively. Patients with previous RIF were compared based on the testing they received: PGT-A, ERA, or PGT-A+ERA versus a control group with no testing. Mean implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were considered primary outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed and adjusted ORs were calculated to control possible bias. Results Of the 2110 patients belonging to the moderate RIF group, those who underwent transfer of euploid embryos after PGT-A had a higher implantation rate than those who did not. Additionally, the PGT-A group had a significantly higher rate of ongoing pregnancy. The same outcomes measured for the 488 patients in the severe RIF group did not reveal any statistically significant improvements. The use of the ERA test did not appear to significantly improve outcomes in either group. Conclusions PGT-A may be beneficial for patients with moderate recurrent implantation failure but not for severe cases. At its current level of development, ERA does not appear to be clinically useful for patients with RIF.
引用
收藏
页码:2989 / 2997
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] First clinical outcomes after personalized embryo transfer using the new endometrial receptivity test in recurrent implantation failure patients
    Ohara, Y.
    Matsubayashi, H.
    Yamaguchi, K.
    Kitaya, K.
    Doshida, M.
    Takeuchi, T.
    Ishikawa, T.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : I297 - I297
  • [32] Assessment of endometrial receptivity by Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) in patients with adenomyosis and previous implantation failure
    Kaur, S.
    Mahajan, N.
    Naidu, P.
    Rani, K.
    Kaur, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 358 - 358
  • [33] Performance of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in IVF cycles for patients with advanced maternal age, repeat implantation failure, and idiopathic recurrent miscarriage
    Lee, Chun-, I
    Wu, Cheng-Hsuan
    Pai, Yi-Ping
    Chang, Yu-Jun
    Chen, Chung-, I
    Lee, Tsung-Hsien
    Lee, Maw-Sheng
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 58 (02): : 239 - 243
  • [34] Predictive value of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated IVF-ET cycles among women with recurrent implantation failure
    Pagidas, K.
    Ying, Y.
    Keefe, D.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2008, 25 (2-3) : 103 - 106
  • [35] Predictive value of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated IVF-ET cycles among women with recurrent implantation failure
    K. Pagidas
    Y. Ying
    D. Keefe
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2008, 25 : 103 - 106
  • [36] Potential innate immunity-related markers of endometrial receptivity and recurrent implantation failure (RIF)
    Basatvat, Shaghayegh
    Russell, Jean Marion
    Saare, Merli
    Thurston, Lisa Marie
    Salumets, Andres
    Fazeli, Alireza
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (04)
  • [37] The role of endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of recurrent implantation failure.
    Hartnett, JM
    Engmann, L
    Sanders, MM
    Maier, D
    Nulsen, J
    Benadiva, C
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S272 - S272
  • [38] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy optimizes reproductive outcomes in recurrent reproductive failure: a systematic review
    Mei, Youwen
    Lin, Yonghong
    Chen, Ying
    Zheng, Jiafeng
    Ke, Xue
    Liang, Xuefei
    Wang, Fang
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [39] Effect of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on Live Birth Rate in Young Women With Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicentre Randomised Trial
    Guan, Hengyu
    He, Yaqiong
    Lu, Yao
    Huang, Jiaan
    Wang, Yuan
    Zhu, Qinling
    Qi, Jia
    Lin, Wen
    Lindheim, Steven R.
    Wei, Zhe
    Ding, Ying
    Sun, Yun
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024,
  • [40] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy helps to achieve a live birth with fewer transfer cycles for the blastocyst FET patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure
    Wang, Sidong
    Liu, Luochuan
    Ma, Minyue
    Wang, Hui
    Han, Yibing
    Guo, Xinmeng
    Yeung, William S. B.
    Cheng, Yanfei
    Zhang, Huiting
    Dong, Fengming
    Zhang, Bolun
    Tian, Ye
    Song, Jiangnan
    Peng, Hongmei
    Yao, Yuanqing
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 308 (02) : 599 - 610