Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan

被引:12
|
作者
Ohara, Yasuhiro [1 ,2 ]
Matsubayashi, Hidehiko [1 ,3 ]
Suzuki, Yosuke [3 ]
Takaya, Yukiko [3 ]
Yamaguchi, Kohei [1 ,3 ]
Doshida, Masakazu [1 ]
Takeuchi, Takumi [1 ]
Ishikawa, Tomomoto [1 ,3 ]
Handa, Mika [2 ]
Miyake, Tatsuya [2 ]
Takiuchi, Tsuyoshi [4 ]
Kimura, Tadashi [2 ]
机构
[1] Reprod Clin Tokyo, Dept Reprod Med, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[3] Reprod Clin Osaka, Dept Reprod Med, Osaka, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Clin Genom, Suita, Osaka, Japan
关键词
advanced maternal age; endometrial receptivity test; personalized embryo transfer; recurrent implantation failure; window of implantation; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; ARRAY; DURATION; CYCLES; FROZEN; WOMEN; TRIAL; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/rmb2.12444
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose To assess the clinical efficacy of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by a new endometrial receptivity test, ERPeak(SM), in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Methods Recurrent implantation failure patients of all ages at two private Japanese clinics from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The intervention group (n = 244) received pET in accordance with endometrial receptivity testing results and was compared to control group (n = 306) receiving standardized timing, non-personalized embryo transfer (npET). In propensity score matching analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were compared between groups, and a subanalysis of advanced maternal age (AMA) (>= 38 years old) versus non-AMA (<38 years old) patients was also conducted. Results The CPR and LBR of the pET group were significantly higher than those of the npET group (37.7% vs. 20.0%, adjusted OR: 2.64; 95%CI, 1.70-4.11, p < 0.001 and 29.9% vs. 9.7%, adjusted OR: 4.13; 95%CI, 2.40-7.13, p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in the subanalyses, the CPR and LBR of the pET group were significantly higher than those of the npET group in both the AMA non-AMA patients. Conclusions The new ERPeak(SM) endometrial receptivity test is a useful alternative diagnostic tool for poor-prognosis patients, regardless of age.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endometrial receptivity and its relationship with clinical factors in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Pankiewicz, Katarzyna
    Opuchlik, Katarzyna
    Pierzynski, Piotr
    Issat, Tadeusz
    Laudanski, Piotr
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 293 : 259 - 259
  • [2] CLINICAL UTILITY OF THE NEW ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY TEST IN ADVANCED MATERNAL AGE PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE.
    Ohara, Yasuhiro
    Matsubayashi, Hidehiko
    Doshida, Masakazu
    Takeuchi, Takumi
    Ishikawa, Tomomoto
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E314 - E315
  • [3] Ultrastructural markers of tissue endometrial receptivity in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Melkozerova, O. A.
    Bashmakova, N. V.
    Malgina, G. B.
    Bragina, E. E.
    Michelson, A. A.
    Chistyakova, G. N.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 : 45 - 48
  • [4] No endometrial receptivity assay of enlightenment for recurrent implantation failure
    Bosch, Allison
    Hipp, Heather S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (02) : 239 - 240
  • [5] First clinical outcomes after personalized embryo transfer using the new endometrial receptivity test in recurrent implantation failure patients
    Ohara, Y.
    Matsubayashi, H.
    Yamaguchi, K.
    Kitaya, K.
    Doshida, M.
    Takeuchi, T.
    Ishikawa, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : I297 - I297
  • [6] Evaluation of endometrial receptivity in recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure
    Canan, Sultan
    Inan, Mehmet Arda
    Erdem, Ahmet
    Demirdag, Erhan
    Gunduz, Mualla Ilknur
    Erdem, Ozlem
    Erdem, Mehmet
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 21 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [7] Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure
    Cozzolino, Mauro
    Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Garrido, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (12) : 2989 - 2997
  • [8] Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure
    Mauro Cozzolino
    Patricia Diaz-Gimeno
    Antonio Pellicer
    Nicolas Garrido
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2020, 37 : 2989 - 2997
  • [9] The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
    Chen, Jingjing
    He, Aihua
    Zhang, Qiong
    Zhao, Jing
    Fu, Jing
    Li, Hui
    Li, Yanping
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] Effect of an Immune Modulator on Endometrial Receptivity in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure
    Germeyer, Ariane
    Senghaas, Annika
    Jauckus, Julia
    Strowitzki, Thomas
    von Wolff, Michael
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 16 (03) : 365A - 366A