Typicality effects in picture-word interference paradigm: An evaluation of the response exclusion hypothesis

被引:1
|
作者
Fang, Yanhong [1 ]
Zhang, Jijia [2 ]
Yin, Guanhai [1 ]
Hu, Senqi [3 ]
Zhang, Entao [4 ]
机构
[1] Jinggangshan Univ, Dept Psychol, Jian, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Dept Psychol, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[3] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[4] E China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Typicality effects; picture-word interference paradigm; response-relevant criteria; SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE; DISTRACTOR FREQUENCY; LEXICAL-COMPETITION; FACILITATION; LANGUAGE; ACTIVATION; SELECTION; ACCESS; SEE;
D O I
10.1111/sjop.12197
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The response exclusion hypothesis suggests that the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm is determined by the response-relevant criteria. Semantic interference effects would be observed when semantically related distractor words satisfy the response-relevant criteria; otherwise, semantic facilitation effects should be found. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the response exclusion hypothesis by exploring the typicality effects in pictures naming. In two experiments, pictures of objects were named either in the context of verb distractor words with different typicality of passive functions or in the context of adjective distractor words with different typicality of characteristics. Facilitation effects were observed in context of typical verbs and adjectives, while interference effects were observed in the context of atypical verbs and adjectives. Given that neither typical nor atypical distractor words satisfy the response-relevant criteria to produce noun, these findings are problematic for the response exclusion hypothesis. Role of syntagmatic relationships in lexical retrieval was invoked to explain present findings.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 253
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Picture-word interference and the response exclusion hypothesis
    Mulatti, Claudio
    Coltheart, Max
    CORTEX, 2012, 48 (03) : 363 - 372
  • [2] Picture-word interference and the Response-Exclusion Hypothesis: A response to Mulatti and Coltheart
    Mahon, Bradford Z.
    Garcea, Frank E.
    Navarrete, Eduardo
    CORTEX, 2012, 48 (03) : 373 - 377
  • [3] Orthographic and phonological effects in picture-word interference paradigm
    Bi, YC
    Xu, YD
    Caramazza, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 471 - 471
  • [4] The word class effect in the picture-word interference paradigm
    Janssen, Niels
    Melinger, Alissa
    Mahon, Bradford Z.
    Finkbeiner, Matthew
    Caramazza, Alfonso
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (06): : 1233 - 1246
  • [5] POLARITY EFFECTS AND THE ROLE OF STRATEGIES IN THE PICTURE-WORD INTERFERENCE PARADIGM
    Collina, Simona
    De Simone, Flavia
    RIVISTA DI PSICOLINGUISTICA APPLICATA-JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2014, 14 (02): : 55 - 71
  • [6] The Distractor Frequency Effect in Picture-Word Interference: Evidence for Response Exclusion
    Dhooge, Elisah
    Hartsuiker, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (04) : 878 - 891
  • [7] Word Production and the Picture-Word Interference Paradigm: The Role of Learning
    Simona Collina
    Patrizia Tabossi
    Flavia De Simone
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2013, 42 : 461 - 473
  • [8] Electrophysiological characterization of facilitation and interference in the picture-word interference paradigm
    Buerki, Audrey
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 (09) : 1370 - 1392
  • [9] The Picture-Word Interference Paradigm: Grammatical Class Effects in Lexical Production
    De Simone, Flavia
    Collina, Simona
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 45 (05) : 1003 - 1019
  • [10] The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter?
    Caramazza, A
    Costa, A
    COGNITION, 2000, 75 (02) : B51 - B64