Typicality effects in picture-word interference paradigm: An evaluation of the response exclusion hypothesis

被引:1
|
作者
Fang, Yanhong [1 ]
Zhang, Jijia [2 ]
Yin, Guanhai [1 ]
Hu, Senqi [3 ]
Zhang, Entao [4 ]
机构
[1] Jinggangshan Univ, Dept Psychol, Jian, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Dept Psychol, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[3] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[4] E China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Typicality effects; picture-word interference paradigm; response-relevant criteria; SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE; DISTRACTOR FREQUENCY; LEXICAL-COMPETITION; FACILITATION; LANGUAGE; ACTIVATION; SELECTION; ACCESS; SEE;
D O I
10.1111/sjop.12197
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The response exclusion hypothesis suggests that the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm is determined by the response-relevant criteria. Semantic interference effects would be observed when semantically related distractor words satisfy the response-relevant criteria; otherwise, semantic facilitation effects should be found. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the response exclusion hypothesis by exploring the typicality effects in pictures naming. In two experiments, pictures of objects were named either in the context of verb distractor words with different typicality of passive functions or in the context of adjective distractor words with different typicality of characteristics. Facilitation effects were observed in context of typical verbs and adjectives, while interference effects were observed in the context of atypical verbs and adjectives. Given that neither typical nor atypical distractor words satisfy the response-relevant criteria to produce noun, these findings are problematic for the response exclusion hypothesis. Role of syntagmatic relationships in lexical retrieval was invoked to explain present findings.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 253
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The fundamental phonological unit of Japanese word production: An EEG study using the picture-word interference paradigm
    Verdonschot, Rinus G.
    Tokimoto, Shingo
    Miyaoka, Yayoi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2019, 51 : 184 - 193
  • [42] Semantic picture-word interference is a postperceptual effect
    Schnur, Tatiana T.
    Martin, Randi
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (02) : 301 - 308
  • [43] Transforming semantic interference into facilitation in a picture-word interference task
    Zhang, Qingfang
    Feng, Chen
    Zhu, Xuebing
    Wang, Cheng
    APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2016, 37 (05) : 1025 - 1049
  • [44] Picture-Word Interference Effects Are Robust With Covert Retrieval, With and Without Gamification
    Wei, Hsi T.
    Hu, You Zhi
    Chignell, Mark
    Meltzer, Jed A.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [45] Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference
    Jescheniak, JD
    Schriefers, H
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54 (02): : 371 - 382
  • [46] The influence of stimulus onset asynchrony on semantic effect in spoken word production: A picture-word interference paradigm study
    Zhou Yuxi
    Liu Yuhao
    Zhang Qingfang
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 54 (05) : 453 - +
  • [47] THE ROLE OF PHONETIC AND ORTHOGRAPHIC SIMILARITY IN PICTURE-WORD INTERFERENCE
    LUPKER, SJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1982, 36 (03): : 349 - 367
  • [48] CONFLICT MONITORING IN AMNESTIC MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: FINDINGS FROM A PICTURE-WORD INTERFERENCE PARADIGM
    Lydon, Elizabeth
    Mudar, Raksha
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2024, 8 : 1028 - 1028
  • [49] AUTOMATIC SEMANTIC PROCESSING IN A PICTURE-WORD INTERFERENCE TASK
    ROSINSKI, RR
    MICHNICKGOLINKOFF, R
    KUKISH, KS
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1975, 46 (01) : 247 - 253
  • [50] The time course of Chinese lexical access in speech production: Picture-word interference paradigm study
    Zhang, QF
    Yang, YF
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDING, 2001, : 711 - 716