Rejoinder: "Co-citation and Co-authorship Networks of Statisticians"

被引:0
|
作者
Ji, Pengsheng [1 ]
Jin, Jiashun [2 ]
Ke, Zheng Tracy [3 ]
Li, Wanshan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
LATENT SPACE MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/07350015.2022.2055358
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We collected and cleaned a large dataset on publications in statistics. The dataset consists of the co-author relationships and citation relationships of 83, 331 articles published in 36 representative journals in statistics, probability, and machine learning, spanning 41 years. The dataset allows us to construct many different networks, and motivates a number of research problems about the research patterns and trends, research impacts, and network topology of the statistics community. In this article we focus on (i) using the citation relationships to estimate the research interests of authors, and (ii) using the co-author relationships to study the network topology. Using co-citation networks we constructed, we discover a “statistics triangle,” reminiscent of the statistical philosophy triangle (Efron 1998). We propose new approaches to constructing the “research map” of statisticians, as well as the “research trajectory” for a given author to visualize his/her research interest evolvement. Using co-authorship networks we constructed, we discover a multi-layer community tree and produce a Sankey diagram to visualize the author migrations in different sub-areas. We also propose several new metrics for research diversity of individual authors. We find that “Bayes,” “Biostatistics,” and “Nonparametric” are three primary areas in statistics. We also identify 15 sub-areas, each of which can be viewed as a weighted average of the primary areas, and identify several underlying reasons for the formation of co-authorship communities. We also find that the research interests of statisticians have evolved significantly in the 41-year time window we studied: some areas (e.g., biostatistics, high-dimensional data analysis, etc.) have become increasingly more popular. The research diversity of statisticians may be lower than we might have expected. For example, for the personalized networks of most authors, the p-values of the proposed significance tests are relatively large. © 2021 American Statistical Association.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 504
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CO-AUTHORSHIP AND PRODUCTIVITY
    PAO, ML
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1980, 17 : 279 - 281
  • [42] What is co-authorship?
    Ponomariov, Branco
    Boardman, Craig
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 109 (03) : 1939 - 1963
  • [43] REASONS FOR CO-AUTHORSHIP
    KUH, GD
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1982, 63 (10) : 714 - 714
  • [44] What is co-authorship?
    Branco Ponomariov
    Craig Boardman
    Scientometrics, 2016, 109 : 1939 - 1963
  • [45] Economics of co-authorship
    Bruno, Bruna
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2014, 44 (02) : 212 - 220
  • [46] The proximity of co-citation
    Shengbo Liu
    Chaomei Chen
    Scientometrics, 2012, 91 : 495 - 511
  • [47] The proximity of co-citation
    Liu, Shengbo
    Chen, Chaomei
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 91 (02) : 495 - 511
  • [48] Predicting Co-Author Relationship in Medical Co-Authorship Networks
    Yu, Qi
    Long, Chao
    Lv, Yanhua
    Shao, Hongfang
    He, Peifeng
    Duan, Zhiguang
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07):
  • [49] Exploiting Fine-Grained Co-Authorship for Personalized Citation Recommendation
    Guo, Lantian
    Cai, Xiaoyan
    Hao, Fei
    Mu, Dejun
    Fang, Changjian
    Yang, Libin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 : 12714 - 12725
  • [50] Social stratification in networks: insights from co-authorship networks
    Jalali, Zeinab S.
    Introne, Josh
    Soundarajan, Sucheta
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2023, 20 (198)