Rejoinder: "Co-citation and Co-authorship Networks of Statisticians"

被引:0
|
作者
Ji, Pengsheng [1 ]
Jin, Jiashun [2 ]
Ke, Zheng Tracy [3 ]
Li, Wanshan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
LATENT SPACE MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/07350015.2022.2055358
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We collected and cleaned a large dataset on publications in statistics. The dataset consists of the co-author relationships and citation relationships of 83, 331 articles published in 36 representative journals in statistics, probability, and machine learning, spanning 41 years. The dataset allows us to construct many different networks, and motivates a number of research problems about the research patterns and trends, research impacts, and network topology of the statistics community. In this article we focus on (i) using the citation relationships to estimate the research interests of authors, and (ii) using the co-author relationships to study the network topology. Using co-citation networks we constructed, we discover a “statistics triangle,” reminiscent of the statistical philosophy triangle (Efron 1998). We propose new approaches to constructing the “research map” of statisticians, as well as the “research trajectory” for a given author to visualize his/her research interest evolvement. Using co-authorship networks we constructed, we discover a multi-layer community tree and produce a Sankey diagram to visualize the author migrations in different sub-areas. We also propose several new metrics for research diversity of individual authors. We find that “Bayes,” “Biostatistics,” and “Nonparametric” are three primary areas in statistics. We also identify 15 sub-areas, each of which can be viewed as a weighted average of the primary areas, and identify several underlying reasons for the formation of co-authorship communities. We also find that the research interests of statisticians have evolved significantly in the 41-year time window we studied: some areas (e.g., biostatistics, high-dimensional data analysis, etc.) have become increasingly more popular. The research diversity of statisticians may be lower than we might have expected. For example, for the personalized networks of most authors, the p-values of the proposed significance tests are relatively large. © 2021 American Statistical Association.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 504
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Visualizing Co-authorship networks in online wikipedia
    Biuk-Aghai, Robert P.
    2006 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES,VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 787 - 792
  • [32] Tourism Research Co-authorship Networks in China
    Zhang, Jiekuan
    JOURNAL OF CHINA TOURISM RESEARCH, 2015, 11 (04) : 424 - 439
  • [33] Research topic flows in co-authorship networks
    Schaefermeier, Bastian
    Hirth, Johannes
    Hanika, Tom
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (09) : 5051 - 5078
  • [34] Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research
    Kai Fischbach
    Johannes Putzke
    Detlef Schoder
    Electronic Markets, 2011, 21 : 19 - 40
  • [35] Detecting Strong Cliques in Co-authorship Networks
    Papik, Lukas
    Ochodkova, Eliska
    Kudelka, Milos
    COMPLEX NETWORKS & THEIR APPLICATIONS XII, VOL 2, COMPLEX NETWORKS 2023, 2024, 1142 : 197 - 208
  • [36] PageRank for Ranking Authors in Co-citation Networks
    Ding, Ying
    Yan, Erjia
    Frazho, Arthur
    Caverlee, James
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (11): : 2229 - 2243
  • [37] Can Rough Co-citation Improve the Performance of Co-citation Clustering?
    Eto, Masaki
    JCDL'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES, 2018, : 329 - 330
  • [38] Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks
    Egghe, L
    Rousseau, R
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 55 (03) : 349 - 361
  • [39] Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks
    Leo Egghe
    Ronald Rousseau
    Scientometrics, 2002, 55 : 349 - 361
  • [40] PITFALLS OF CO-AUTHORSHIP
    不详
    NATURE, 1994, 372 (6505) : 390 - 390