Rejoinder: "Co-citation and Co-authorship Networks of Statisticians"

被引:0
|
作者
Ji, Pengsheng [1 ]
Jin, Jiashun [2 ]
Ke, Zheng Tracy [3 ]
Li, Wanshan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
LATENT SPACE MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/07350015.2022.2055358
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We collected and cleaned a large dataset on publications in statistics. The dataset consists of the co-author relationships and citation relationships of 83, 331 articles published in 36 representative journals in statistics, probability, and machine learning, spanning 41 years. The dataset allows us to construct many different networks, and motivates a number of research problems about the research patterns and trends, research impacts, and network topology of the statistics community. In this article we focus on (i) using the citation relationships to estimate the research interests of authors, and (ii) using the co-author relationships to study the network topology. Using co-citation networks we constructed, we discover a “statistics triangle,” reminiscent of the statistical philosophy triangle (Efron 1998). We propose new approaches to constructing the “research map” of statisticians, as well as the “research trajectory” for a given author to visualize his/her research interest evolvement. Using co-authorship networks we constructed, we discover a multi-layer community tree and produce a Sankey diagram to visualize the author migrations in different sub-areas. We also propose several new metrics for research diversity of individual authors. We find that “Bayes,” “Biostatistics,” and “Nonparametric” are three primary areas in statistics. We also identify 15 sub-areas, each of which can be viewed as a weighted average of the primary areas, and identify several underlying reasons for the formation of co-authorship communities. We also find that the research interests of statisticians have evolved significantly in the 41-year time window we studied: some areas (e.g., biostatistics, high-dimensional data analysis, etc.) have become increasingly more popular. The research diversity of statisticians may be lower than we might have expected. For example, for the personalized networks of most authors, the p-values of the proposed significance tests are relatively large. © 2021 American Statistical Association.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 504
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effects of Co-citation Proximity on Co-citation Analysis
    Liu, Shengbo
    Chen, Chaomei
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2011: THE 13TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 474 - 484
  • [22] On Spectral Partitioning of Co-authorship Networks
    Snasel, Vaclav
    Kroemer, Pavel
    Platos, Jan
    Kudelka, Milos
    Horak, Zdenek
    COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT (CISIM), 2012, 7564 : 302 - 313
  • [23] Authorship, Co-Authorship, and Multiple Authorship
    Hick, Darren Hudson
    JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM, 2014, 72 (02): : 147 - 156
  • [24] Augmenting context-aware citation recommendations with citation and co-authorship history
    Bhowmick, Anubrata
    Singhal, Ashish
    Wang, Shenghui
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS (ISSI2021), 2021, : 115 - 120
  • [25] Gender gaps in Australian research publishing, citation and co-authorship
    Jamali, Hamid R.
    Abbasi, Alireza
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (05) : 2879 - 2893
  • [26] Gender gaps in Australian research publishing, citation and co-authorship
    Hamid R. Jamali
    Alireza Abbasi
    Scientometrics, 2023, 128 : 2879 - 2893
  • [27] Analysis of Significance and Evolution of Co-authorship Networks
    Kudelka, Milos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL AFRO-EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR INDUSTRIAL ADVANCEMENT (AECIA 2015), 2016, 427 : 3 - 4
  • [28] A Hybrid Recommendation System in Co-authorship Networks
    Aslan, Serpil
    Kaya, Mehmet
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP 2019), 2019,
  • [29] Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research
    Fischbach, Kai
    Putzke, Johannes
    Schoder, Detlef
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2011, 21 (01) : 19 - 40
  • [30] Co-authorship Networks in Swiss Political Research
    Leifeld, Philip
    Ingold, Karin
    SWISS POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 22 (02) : 264 - 287