Selecting technologies to engage in sustainability transitions-A multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:7
|
作者
Block, Carolin [1 ]
Rennings, Michael [2 ]
Broering, Stefanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Chair Innovat & Management Agribusiness, Bonn, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Ctr Entrepreneurship Innovat & Transformat CEIT, Chair Entrepreneurship & Innovat Business Models, Bochum, Germany
关键词
bio-based economy; business stakeholder; group concept mapping; sustainability transition; technology selection; GREEN PRODUCT INNOVATION; BUSINESS MODELS; ENERGY; FRAMEWORK; RECONFIGURATION; DETERMINANTS; ORGANIZATION; INDICATORS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3316
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given the need for systemic changes to reach a sustainability transition from a fossil-based toward a bio-based economy, it is crucial to align different actors' expectations along the value chain when developing and commercializing sustainability-oriented technologies (SOTs). To analyze what different actors along the value chain look for when selecting SOTs, this study draws upon a group concept mapping approach based on a group discussion and a subsequent sorting and rating process of selection criteria. Applied to the case of the bio-based economy, this study seeks to aggregate the perceptions of four different stakeholder groups along the value chain, that is, (1) agricultural and feedstock, (2) (bio)chemical, (3) consumer industries, and (4) consultancies and networks. We derive 11 different categories subsuming 59 criteria that have been perceived as relevant when selecting SOTs. Results show that selection criteria related to the future competitiveness, the public acceptance, and the sustainability aspects of the technology are perceived as highly relevant for most actors when selecting SOTs. Further, we summarize the 11 categories into four dimensions involving (1) market environment and viability, (2) corporate strategy and technology integration, (3) capabilities and knowledge exchange, and (4) institutional and regulatory frames related criteria. We contribute to sustainability transition literature by providing, first, a conceptual framework for relevant selection criteria of SOTs from a value chain spanning perspective; and second, areas of coherence versus noncoherence in technology evaluation across different value chain actors allowing targeted support initiatives to facilitate the technology transfer in the context of sustainability transitions.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3569 / 3595
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-stakeholder perspectives on sustainability transitions in the cosmetic industry
    Suphasomboon, Tawalhathai
    Vassanadumrongdee, Sujitra
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 38 : 225 - 240
  • [2] Supplier Development Practices for Sustainability: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective
    Liu, Lingxuan
    Zhang, Min
    Hendry, Linda C.
    Bu, Maoliang
    Wang, Shi
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (01) : 100 - 116
  • [3] Sustainability indicators for festival tourism: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Liu, Chyong-Ru
    Lin, Wei-Rong
    Wang, Yao-Chin
    Chen, Shan-Pei
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HOSPITALITY & TOURISM, 2019, 20 (03) : 296 - 316
  • [4] Encouraging older people to engage in resistance training: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Pettigrew, Simone
    Burton, Elissa
    Farrier, Kaela
    Hill, Anne-Marie
    Bainbridge, Liz
    Airey, Phil
    Lewin, Gill
    Hill, Keith D.
    AGEING & SOCIETY, 2019, 39 (08) : 1806 - 1825
  • [5] Barriers to social sustainability in urbanisation: a comparative multi-stakeholder perspective
    Sharif A.A.
    City, Territory and Architecture, 10 (1)
  • [6] Varieties of multi-stakeholder governance: selecting legitimation strategies in transnational sustainability politics
    Schleifer, Philip
    GLOBALIZATIONS, 2019, 16 (01) : 50 - 66
  • [7] A review of corporate sustainability drivers in maritime ports: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ashrafi, Mehrnaz
    Walker, Tony R.
    Magnan, Gregory M.
    Adams, Michelle
    Acciaro, Michele
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 47 (08) : 1027 - 1044
  • [8] Multi-stakeholder microgrids for resilience and sustainability
    Bird, Stephen
    Hotaling, Chelsea
    ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 16 (02): : 116 - 132
  • [9] The emergence of digitalization to the manufacturing sector in the sustainability context: A multi-stakeholder perspective analysis
    Sankar, M. S. Kiran
    Gupta, Sumit
    Luthra, Sunil
    Jagtap, Sandeep
    Singh, Sanjeet
    Kumar, Anil
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 468
  • [10] Ecotourism development in Penang Hill: a multi-stakeholder perspective towards achieving environmental sustainability
    Salman, Ahmad
    Jaafar, Mastura
    Mohamad, Diana
    Malik, Summaira
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (31) : 42945 - 42958