Selecting technologies to engage in sustainability transitions-A multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:7
|
作者
Block, Carolin [1 ]
Rennings, Michael [2 ]
Broering, Stefanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Chair Innovat & Management Agribusiness, Bonn, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Ctr Entrepreneurship Innovat & Transformat CEIT, Chair Entrepreneurship & Innovat Business Models, Bochum, Germany
关键词
bio-based economy; business stakeholder; group concept mapping; sustainability transition; technology selection; GREEN PRODUCT INNOVATION; BUSINESS MODELS; ENERGY; FRAMEWORK; RECONFIGURATION; DETERMINANTS; ORGANIZATION; INDICATORS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3316
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given the need for systemic changes to reach a sustainability transition from a fossil-based toward a bio-based economy, it is crucial to align different actors' expectations along the value chain when developing and commercializing sustainability-oriented technologies (SOTs). To analyze what different actors along the value chain look for when selecting SOTs, this study draws upon a group concept mapping approach based on a group discussion and a subsequent sorting and rating process of selection criteria. Applied to the case of the bio-based economy, this study seeks to aggregate the perceptions of four different stakeholder groups along the value chain, that is, (1) agricultural and feedstock, (2) (bio)chemical, (3) consumer industries, and (4) consultancies and networks. We derive 11 different categories subsuming 59 criteria that have been perceived as relevant when selecting SOTs. Results show that selection criteria related to the future competitiveness, the public acceptance, and the sustainability aspects of the technology are perceived as highly relevant for most actors when selecting SOTs. Further, we summarize the 11 categories into four dimensions involving (1) market environment and viability, (2) corporate strategy and technology integration, (3) capabilities and knowledge exchange, and (4) institutional and regulatory frames related criteria. We contribute to sustainability transition literature by providing, first, a conceptual framework for relevant selection criteria of SOTs from a value chain spanning perspective; and second, areas of coherence versus noncoherence in technology evaluation across different value chain actors allowing targeted support initiatives to facilitate the technology transfer in the context of sustainability transitions.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3569 / 3595
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating the adoption of sensor and robotic technologies from a multi-stakeholder perspective: The case of greenhouse sector in China
    Min, Xinyuan
    Sok, Jaap
    Qian, Tian
    Zhou, Weihao
    Oude Lansink, Alfons
    Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, 210
  • [22] The role of sustainability knowledge-action platforms in advancing multi-stakeholder engagement on sustainability
    Mcintosh, Oliver Bream
    Burnett, Amy
    Feldman, Ira
    Lamphere, Jenna A.
    Reuter, Thomas A.
    Vital, Emmanuelle
    DATA & POLICY, 2023, 5
  • [23] Improving the sustainability of the wheat supply chain through multi-stakeholder engagement
    Deng, Lijuan
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Wang, Chong
    Ma, Wenqi
    Zhu, Annah
    Zhang, Fusuo
    Jiao, Xiaoqiang
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 321
  • [24] Understanding coastal and marine tourism sustainability-A multi-stakeholder analysis
    Dimitrovski, Darko
    Lemmetyinen, Arja
    Nieminen, Lenita
    Pohjola, Tuomas
    JOURNAL OF DESTINATION MARKETING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 19
  • [25] Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: Beyond deadlock and conflict.
    Moran, D
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2003, 29 (01) : 132 - 133
  • [26] Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective
    Hovring, Christiane Marie
    Andersen, Sophie Esmann
    Nielsen, Anne Ellerup
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 152 (03) : 627 - 645
  • [27] The impact of policy changes on the mustard ecosystem: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ray, Mohit
    Kumar, Avinash
    Srivastava, Samir K.
    JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2023,
  • [28] Moral considerations on social robots in education: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Smakman, Matthijs
    Vogt, Paul
    Konijn, Elly A.
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2021, 174
  • [29] The core of secondary level quantum education: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Merzel, Avraham
    Bitzenbauer, Philipp
    Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, Kim
    Stadermann, Kirsten
    Andreotti, Erica
    Anttila, Daria
    Bondani, Maria
    Chiofalo, Maria Luisa
    Faletic, Sergej
    Frans, Renaat
    Goorney, Simon
    Greinert, Franziska
    Jurcic, Leon
    Koupilova, Zdenka
    Malgieri, Massimiliano
    Mueller, Rainer
    Onorato, Pasquale
    Pospiech, Gesche
    Ubben, Malte
    Woitzik, Andreas
    Pol, Henk
    EPJ QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [30] Framework for Evaluating and Implementing Inpatient Portals: a Multi-stakeholder Perspective
    Walker, Daniel M.
    Hefner, Jennifer L.
    Sieck, Cynthia J.
    Huerta, Timothy R.
    McAlearney, Ann Scheck
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (09)