Selecting technologies to engage in sustainability transitions-A multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:7
|
作者
Block, Carolin [1 ]
Rennings, Michael [2 ]
Broering, Stefanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Chair Innovat & Management Agribusiness, Bonn, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Ctr Entrepreneurship Innovat & Transformat CEIT, Chair Entrepreneurship & Innovat Business Models, Bochum, Germany
关键词
bio-based economy; business stakeholder; group concept mapping; sustainability transition; technology selection; GREEN PRODUCT INNOVATION; BUSINESS MODELS; ENERGY; FRAMEWORK; RECONFIGURATION; DETERMINANTS; ORGANIZATION; INDICATORS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3316
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given the need for systemic changes to reach a sustainability transition from a fossil-based toward a bio-based economy, it is crucial to align different actors' expectations along the value chain when developing and commercializing sustainability-oriented technologies (SOTs). To analyze what different actors along the value chain look for when selecting SOTs, this study draws upon a group concept mapping approach based on a group discussion and a subsequent sorting and rating process of selection criteria. Applied to the case of the bio-based economy, this study seeks to aggregate the perceptions of four different stakeholder groups along the value chain, that is, (1) agricultural and feedstock, (2) (bio)chemical, (3) consumer industries, and (4) consultancies and networks. We derive 11 different categories subsuming 59 criteria that have been perceived as relevant when selecting SOTs. Results show that selection criteria related to the future competitiveness, the public acceptance, and the sustainability aspects of the technology are perceived as highly relevant for most actors when selecting SOTs. Further, we summarize the 11 categories into four dimensions involving (1) market environment and viability, (2) corporate strategy and technology integration, (3) capabilities and knowledge exchange, and (4) institutional and regulatory frames related criteria. We contribute to sustainability transition literature by providing, first, a conceptual framework for relevant selection criteria of SOTs from a value chain spanning perspective; and second, areas of coherence versus noncoherence in technology evaluation across different value chain actors allowing targeted support initiatives to facilitate the technology transfer in the context of sustainability transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:3569 / 3595
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Embedding Sustainability in Business Modelling through Multi-stakeholder Value Innovation
    Short, Samuel W.
    Rana, Padmakshi
    Bocken, Nancy M. P.
    Evans, Steve
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: COMPETITIVE MANUFACTURING FOR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, AMPS 2012, PT I, 2013, 397 : 175 - 183
  • [32] Improving the sustainability of the wheat supply chain through multi-stakeholder engagement
    Deng, Lijuan
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Wang, Chong
    Ma, Wenqi
    Zhu, Annah
    Zhang, Fusuo
    Jiao, Xiaoqiang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 321
  • [33] A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards
    Pereno, Amina
    Eriksson, Daniel
    FUTURES, 2020, 122
  • [34] Options for imaging cellular therapeutics in vivo: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Helfer, Brooke M.
    Ponomarev, Vladimir
    Patrick, P. Stephen
    Blower, Philip J.
    Feitel, Alexandra
    Fruhwirth, Gilbert O.
    Jackman, Shawna
    Mouries, Lucilia Pereira
    Park, Margriet V. D. Z.
    Srinivas, Mangala
    Stuckey, Daniel J.
    Thu, Mya S.
    van den Hoorn, Tineke
    Herberts, Carla A.
    Shingleton, William D.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2021, 23 (09) : 757 - 773
  • [35] Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ha, Min-Ho
    Yang, Zaili
    Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 73 : 25 - 40
  • [36] Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective
    Christiane Marie Høvring
    Sophie Esmann Andersen
    Anne Ellerup Nielsen
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 152 : 627 - 645
  • [37] Transnational multi-stakeholder sustainability standards and biofuels: understanding standards processes
    Fortin, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2013, 40 (03): : 563 - 587
  • [38] Delivering sustainability in supply networks: Achieving networked multi-stakeholder collaborations
    Josserand, Emmanuel
    Kaine, Sarah
    Nikolova, Natalia
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (05) : 605 - 611
  • [39] Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects
    Severin, Anna
    Chataway, Joanna
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2021, 34 (04) : 537 - 546
  • [40] A multi-stakeholder perspective of relationship marketing in higher education institutions
    Jain, Varsha
    Mogaji, Emmanuel
    Sharma, Himani
    Babbili, Anantha S.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022,