Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China

被引:6
|
作者
Wu, Huijun [1 ]
Liu, Yongxin [1 ]
Dai, Chengjuan [1 ]
Ye, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Zhu, Huimin [1 ]
Fang, Weixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth & Environm, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pig production system; Domestic breeding; Scale breeding; Environmental management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; EMERGY ANALYSIS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CROP PRODUCTION; LAND-USE; PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; POULTRY PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32541-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China, the world's largest consumer and producer of pork in the world, is attracting increasing attention due to the environmental impacts of its pig production. Previous studies seldom comprehensively compare the environmental impacts of the pig production system with different models, resulting in different intensities of environmental impacts. We aim to comprehensively evaluate Chinese pig production with different breeding models and explore a more sustainable way for pig production. We use life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate and compare environmental impacts of pig production system with four main breeding models in China from 1998 to 2020: domestic breeding, small-scale breeding, medium-scale breeding, and large-scale breeding. The life cycle encompasses fertilizer production, feed production, feed processing, pig raising, waste treatment, and slaughtering. The impact categories including energy consumption (EN), global warming (GWP), acidification (AP), eutrophication (EU), water use (WD), and land occupation (LO) are expressed with "100 kg live weight of fattening pig at farm gate." The results show that driven by governmental support, growing meat demand, and cost advantage, the scale breeding especially large-scale breeding simultaneously yielded greater net economic benefit and less environmental impact compared to other breeding models especially the domestic breeding. Due to mineral fertilizer application, feed production contributed over 50% of the total environmental impacts. Notably, the composition of feeds exerted significant influence on the environmental impacts arising from fertilizer production and feed processing. Furthermore, attributable to the substantial use of electricity and heat, as well as the concomitant emissions, pig raising contributed the largest GWP, while ranking second in terms of AP and EU. Notably, waste management constituted the third-largest EU, AP, and WD. In addition to promote scale breeding, we put forth several sustainable measures encompassing feed composition, cultivation practices, fertilizer utilization, and waste management for consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:21668 / 21686
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China
    Huijun Wu
    Yongxin Liu
    Chengjuan Dai
    Yuanyuan Ye
    Huimin Zhu
    Weixin Fang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 21668 - 21686
  • [2] Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment
    Hendrickson, C
    Horvath, A
    Joshi, S
    Lave, L
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (07) : 184A - 191A
  • [3] Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment
    Hendrickson, Chris
    Horvath, Arpad
    Joshi, Satish
    Lave, Lester
    Environmental Science and Technology, 1998, 32 (07):
  • [4] Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge treatment in China
    Xu, Changqing
    Chen, Wei
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 67 : 79 - 87
  • [5] Environmental life-cycle comparisons of steel production and recycling: sustainability issues, problems and prospects
    Yellishetty, Mohan
    Mudd, Gavin M.
    Ranjith, P. G.
    Tharumarajah, A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (06) : 650 - 663
  • [6] The economic consequences of being widowed by war: A life-cycle perspective
    Braun, Sebastian T.
    Stuhler, Jan
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2024, 239
  • [7] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of raw silk production in China
    Wu, Zhaoshan
    Xu, Wenqiang
    Wu, Xiongying
    Ding, Xuemei
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2025, 55 : 11 - 23
  • [8] Economic Process Evaluation and Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of Bio-Aromatics Production
    Kromer, Jens O.
    Ferreira, Rafael G.
    Petrides, Demetri
    Kohlheb, Norbert
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8
  • [9] Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment
    Llorens, Berta
    Pomar, Candido
    Goyette, Bernard
    Rajagopal, Rajinikanth
    Andretta, Ines
    Latorre, Maria Angeles
    Remus, Aline
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102
  • [10] Evaluation of energy-economic and environmental consequences in different fish production systems using a life cycle assessment approach
    Rasooli, Mohsen
    Beheshti, Babak
    Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami
    Ghahdarijani, Mohamad
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2023, 18