Prioritization of habitat construction materials on Mars based on multi-criteria decision-making

被引:3
|
作者
Iranfar, Soha [1 ,2 ]
Karbala, Mohammad Mehdi [3 ]
Shahsavari, Mohammad Hossein [4 ]
Vandeginste, Veerle [5 ]
机构
[1] Petr Univ Technol PUT, Abadan Fac Petr, Dept Petr Engn, Abadan, Iran
[2] Yazd Univ, Dept Min & Met Engn, Yazd, Iran
[3] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Sch Engn, Rock Mech Div, Tehran, Iran
[4] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Tehran Polytech, Hafez Ave, Tehran, Iran
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mat Engn, Campus Bruges, B-8200 Brugge, Belgium
来源
关键词
Building materials; Space habitat construction; Martian concrete; MCDM; FUZZY AHP; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; SULFUR CONCRETE; MCDM METHODS; LUNAR; GEOPOLYMER; MAGNESIUM; EXPLORATION; RADIATION; SIMULANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105864
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Mars is the most accessible planet in the solar system for habitation and could serve as a base for exploring more distant planets. Space agencies and scientists worldwide continue exploring Mars to gain more geologic and atmospheric information in preparation for constructing space habitats. The harsh planetary conditions of Mars require the development of new or modified methods for building infrastructure and formulating binders. Each type of concrete has advantages and dis-advantages, and we need to find the best binder for use in construction on Mars.In this study, eight construction materials, including Ordinary Portland cement (OPC), sulfur concrete, geopolymer, sintered material, polymer-bound regolith, products of geo-thermite re-actions, regolith-based magnesium oxychloride, and microbial-induced calcite precipitation, are reviewed according to 14 criteria. The criteria are availability, shipping, water requirement, technical working conditions, curing time, temperature, total required energy, strength, dura-bility, cosmic radiation shield (density and hydrogen content), additives needed, sustainability, safety, and recyclability. We applied the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach to assign a weighting to each criterion. Finally, we used three multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to determine the most suitable mortar for construction under the harsh con-ditions on Mars.The results show that if the general conditions of Mars are considered uniform such as different temperatures and geologies dependent on location, geopolymer concrete is the best material for construction based on Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), and Weighted Aggregates Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods, and sintered material concrete and sulfur concrete are equally ranked second. Correspondingly, five concretes of Portland cement, products of geo-thermite reactions, regolith-based magnesium oxychloride, polymer-bound regolith, and microbial-induced calcite precipitation are the most efficient construction materials, respectively. In addition, using the Fuzzy AHP method, the criteria of shipping and sustainability have the highest and lowest weighting, respectively, in the decision-making process. The use of MCDM methods and inductive analysis provides a scientific approach that enables the comparison of the potential of several space concrete materials for better decision making in future research and construction within the next 10-20 years.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [22] Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on Modern Methods of Construction
    Sanchez-Garrido, Antonio J.
    Navarro, Ignacio J.
    Yepes, Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 330
  • [23] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Machine Selection in Manufacturing and Construction: Recent Trends
    Hagag, Asmaa M.
    Yousef, Laila S.
    Abdelmaguid, Tamer F.
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [24] Multi-criteria decision-making model for risk management in modular construction projects
    Khodabocus, Sabah
    Seyis, Senem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24 (02) : 240 - 250
  • [25] Cloud service prioritization using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making technique in a cloud computing environment
    Makwe, Aditya
    Kanungo, Priyesh
    Kautish, Sandeep
    Madhu, Golla
    Almazyad, Abdulaziz S.
    Xiong, Guojiang
    Mohamed, Ali Wagdy
    [J]. AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (07)
  • [26] Integrating fuzzy logic and multi-criteria decision-making in a hybrid FMECA for robust risk prioritization
    Chakhrit, Ammar
    Djelamda, Imene
    Bougofa, Mohammed
    Guetarni, Islam H. M.
    Bouafia, Abderraouf
    Chennoufi, Mohammed
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2024,
  • [27] A combined multi-criteria decision-making approach for the selection of carbon-based nanomaterials in materials
    Akgun, Hasret
    Yapici, Ece
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Banar, Mufide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 60
  • [28] Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Noureddine, Mohammad
    Ristic, Milos
    [J]. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2019, 2 (01): : 66 - 85
  • [29] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [30] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL RAW MATERIALS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Cerny, Igor
    Krcmarska, Lucie
    Spakovska, Katerina
    Rolcikova, Marketa
    [J]. 16TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC GEOCONFERENCE, SGEM 2016: SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES IN GEOLOGY, EXPLORATION AND MINING, VOL II, 2016, : 619 - 626