Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multi-criteria decision-making approach

被引:3
|
作者
Noureddine M. [1 ]
Ristic M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of science and technology, University of Djelfa, Djelfa
[2] University of defence in Belgrade, Department of logistics, Belgrade
关键词
FUCOM; Hazardous Materials Routing; MABAC; Multi-criteria Decision-making; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.31181/dmame1901066n
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transport of hazardous material (THM) represents a complex area involving a large number of participants. The imperative of THM is minimization of risks in the entire process of transportation from the aspect of everyone involved in it, which is not an easy task at all. To achieve this, it is necessary in its early phase to carry out adequate evaluation and selection of an optimal transport route. In this paper, optimal route criteria for THM are selected using a new approach in the field of multi-criteria decision-making. Weight coefficients of these criteria were determined by applying the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). Evaluation and selection of hazardous material routes is determined by applying the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and the MABAC (Multi-attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) methods. In order to establish the stability of models and validate the results obtained from the FUCOM-TOPSIS-MABAC model, a sensitivity analysis (of ten different scenarios) was performed. The sensitivity analysis implied changes of the weight coefficients criteria with respect to their original value. The proposed route model was tested on the real example of the transport Eurodiesel in Serbia. © 2018 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 85
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria Decision-making in Urban Planning
    Kilnarova, Pavla
    6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 2017, : 94 - 100
  • [2] DECISION-MAKING IN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION
    LUCKRITZ, RT
    SCHNEIDER, AL
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1980, 4 (02) : 129 - 143
  • [3] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [4] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [5] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [6] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421
  • [7] Happiness at work: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dahiya, Rinki
    Raghuvanshi, Juhi
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04) : 459 - 482
  • [8] A multi-criteria decision making approach to security assessment of hazardous facilities
    Khakzad, Nima
    Reniers, Genserik
    van Gelder, Pieter
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 48 : 234 - 243
  • [9] Multi-criteria decision-making approach for modular enterprise resource planning sorting problems
    Carpitella, Silvia
    Certa, Antonella
    Izquierdo, Joaquin
    La Cascia, Marco
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2021, 28 (5-6) : 234 - 247
  • [10] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168