Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multi-criteria decision-making approach

被引:3
|
作者
Noureddine M. [1 ]
Ristic M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of science and technology, University of Djelfa, Djelfa
[2] University of defence in Belgrade, Department of logistics, Belgrade
关键词
FUCOM; Hazardous Materials Routing; MABAC; Multi-criteria Decision-making; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.31181/dmame1901066n
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transport of hazardous material (THM) represents a complex area involving a large number of participants. The imperative of THM is minimization of risks in the entire process of transportation from the aspect of everyone involved in it, which is not an easy task at all. To achieve this, it is necessary in its early phase to carry out adequate evaluation and selection of an optimal transport route. In this paper, optimal route criteria for THM are selected using a new approach in the field of multi-criteria decision-making. Weight coefficients of these criteria were determined by applying the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). Evaluation and selection of hazardous material routes is determined by applying the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and the MABAC (Multi-attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) methods. In order to establish the stability of models and validate the results obtained from the FUCOM-TOPSIS-MABAC model, a sensitivity analysis (of ten different scenarios) was performed. The sensitivity analysis implied changes of the weight coefficients criteria with respect to their original value. The proposed route model was tested on the real example of the transport Eurodiesel in Serbia. © 2018 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 85
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decoding organisational attractiveness: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Vatankhah, Sanaz
    Roodbari, Hamid
    Rahimi, Roya
    Oraee, Atrina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2025, 37 (02) : 560 - 579
  • [42] A risky multi-criteria decision-making approach under language environment
    Li, Cun-Bin
    Gao, Peng-Fei
    Qi, Zhi-Qiang
    Feng, Xia
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2016, 10 (01): : 69 - 79
  • [43] Approach to the Development, Improvement, and Modification of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    M. M. Potomkin
    O. V. Dublian
    R. B. Khomchak
    Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2019, 55 : 967 - 977
  • [44] Improving bicycle sharing operations: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Liu, Aijun
    Wang, Ruiyao
    Fowler, John
    Ji, Xiaohui
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 297
  • [45] An Alternative Ranking Approach and Its Usage in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Tolga, A. Cagri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2009, 2 (03): : 219 - 235
  • [46] A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Grading of Raw Jute
    Das, Subhasis
    Ghosh, Anindya
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS, 2021, 18 (05) : 685 - 693
  • [47] Ensemble of feature selection algorithms: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Amin Hashemi
    Mohammad Bagher Dowlatshahi
    Hossein Nezamabadi-pour
    International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2022, 13 : 49 - 69
  • [48] Application of multi-criteria decision-making approach in catchment modeling and management
    Keshtkar, Amir R.
    Asefjah, B.
    Afzali, A.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 116 : 83 - 95
  • [49] Ensemble of feature selection algorithms: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Hashemi, Amin
    Dowlatshahi, Mohammad Bagher
    Nezamabadi-pour, Hossein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2022, 13 (01) : 49 - 69
  • [50] Approach to the Development, Improvement, and Modification of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Potomkin, M. M.
    Dublian, O. V.
    Khomchak, R. B.
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2019, 55 (06) : 967 - 977