Application of multi-criteria decision-making approach in catchment modeling and management

被引:3
|
作者
Keshtkar, Amir R. [1 ]
Asefjah, B. [1 ]
Afzali, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Int Desert Res Ctr, Desert Management Dept, Tehran 1417763111, Iran
关键词
Catchment assessment; Biological management; The best scenario; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Fuzzy AHP; FUZZY TOPSIS METHODS; AHP; WATER; SITES; MCDM;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2018.22524
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Choosing the best scenario is very important to the implementation of integrated catchment assessment and management. Research suggests that Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques can be applied to help in the best scenario selection process. As there are many MCDM techniques, the current research performed a comparative analysis of the use of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy AHP approaches in selecting the best scenario decision making. The comparison was made based on the following factors: acceptance of changes in criteria; computational complication; quickness in the decision process; ability to support group decision making; number of optional scenarios and criteria; and uncertainty modeling. Both techniques were used to choose the best scenario. The results indicated that both techniques are appropriate for use in selecting the best scenario, especially for supporting group decision making and uncertainty modeling. However, the Fuzzy TOPSIS approach was found to be better suited for choosing the best scenario in regard to changes in criteria, quickness, and number of optional scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 95
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of multi-criteria decision-making approach in healthcare surgical management
    Gardas, Bhaskar B.
    Ghongade, Nilesh P.
    Jagtap, Annasaheb H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2022, 29 (1-2) : 92 - 109
  • [2] Hospital performance management: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Tyagi, Aman
    Singh, Preetvanti
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 286 - 291
  • [3] Application of multi-criteria group decision-making for water quality management
    Ahvazi, Amin Karbasi
    Ebadi, Taghi
    Zarghami, Mahdi
    Hashemi, Seyed Hossein
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (08)
  • [4] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [5] Utilization of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Emergency Management
    Caylor, Justine P.
    Hammel, Robert J., II
    [J]. COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2021, 25 (04): : 863 - 872
  • [6] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    [J]. MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421
  • [7] Happiness at work: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dahiya, Rinki
    Raghuvanshi, Juhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04) : 459 - 482
  • [8] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [9] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [10] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
    Kabir, Golam
    Sadiq, Rehan
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (09) : 1176 - 1210