Application of multi-criteria decision-making approach in catchment modeling and management

被引:3
|
作者
Keshtkar, Amir R. [1 ]
Asefjah, B. [1 ]
Afzali, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Int Desert Res Ctr, Desert Management Dept, Tehran 1417763111, Iran
关键词
Catchment assessment; Biological management; The best scenario; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Fuzzy AHP; FUZZY TOPSIS METHODS; AHP; WATER; SITES; MCDM;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2018.22524
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Choosing the best scenario is very important to the implementation of integrated catchment assessment and management. Research suggests that Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques can be applied to help in the best scenario selection process. As there are many MCDM techniques, the current research performed a comparative analysis of the use of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy AHP approaches in selecting the best scenario decision making. The comparison was made based on the following factors: acceptance of changes in criteria; computational complication; quickness in the decision process; ability to support group decision making; number of optional scenarios and criteria; and uncertainty modeling. Both techniques were used to choose the best scenario. The results indicated that both techniques are appropriate for use in selecting the best scenario, especially for supporting group decision making and uncertainty modeling. However, the Fuzzy TOPSIS approach was found to be better suited for choosing the best scenario in regard to changes in criteria, quickness, and number of optional scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 95
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [32] Multi-criteria Decision-making in Urban Planning
    Kilnarova, Pavla
    [J]. 6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 2017, : 94 - 100
  • [33] Handling veracity in multi-criteria decision-making: A multi-dimensional approach
    De Tre, Guy
    De Mol, Robin
    Bronselaer, Antoon
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 541 - 554
  • [34] A Multi-criteria Decision-making Optimization Model for Flood Management in Reservoirs
    Nematollahi, Banafsheh
    Nikoo, Mohammad Reza
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    Talebbeydokhti, Nasser
    Rakhshandehroo, Gholam Reza
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (13) : 4933 - 4949
  • [35] Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management
    Garcia-Garcia G.
    [J]. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022, 37
  • [36] Preliminary Evaluation of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methodology for Emergency Management
    Caylor, Justine P.
    Hammell, Robert J., II
    Raglin, Adrienne J.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS AND SYSTEM INTERACTIONS, 2021, 265 : 11 - 18
  • [37] Evaluation of three multi-criteria decision-making methods in Ecosystem Management
    Pavlikakis, Georgios E.
    Tsihrintzis, Vassillos A.
    [J]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Vol B, Poster Presentations, 2003, : 667 - 674
  • [38] A Multi-criteria Decision-making Optimization Model for Flood Management in Reservoirs
    Banafsheh Nematollahi
    Mohammad Reza Nikoo
    Amir H. Gandomi
    Nasser Talebbeydokhti
    Gholam Reza Rakhshandehroo
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 4933 - 4949
  • [39] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN THE SOFTWARE APPLICATION FOR THE SUPPORT OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Moldrik, Petr
    Dvorsky, Jiri
    Krejci, Petr
    Paszek, Leopold
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING 2007, 2007, : 476 - 482
  • [40] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187