MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL RAW MATERIALS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

被引:0
|
作者
Cerny, Igor [1 ]
Krcmarska, Lucie [1 ]
Spakovska, Katerina [1 ]
Rolcikova, Marketa [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Ostrava, VSB, Ostrava, Czech Republic
关键词
critical raw materials; economic importance; risk of supply; Weighted Sum; Approach method; TOPSIS method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Raw materials are essential for sustainable functioning of modern society. Access to mineral raw materials and their affordability is crucial for appropriate performance of EU's economy. Industries such as construction, chemical, automotive, and aerospace industry, mechanical engineering and the equipment manufacturing industry provide a total added value of 1 324 billion and employment for some 30 million people, are fully dependent on access to raw materials. Providing of reliable and undisturbed access to raw materials is a critically important factor for EU's competitiveness and, hence, crucial to the success of the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs. In 2010, the working group of the European Commission drew up a list of the 14 critical raw materials. In 2013, 6 more critical raw materials were added to the list. The criticality of the raw materials was assessed separately according to 2 criteria: economic importance and the supply risks. The objective of this article is to create a list of all the critical raw materials from the most critical to the least critical. Critical raw materials are assessed according to both of the criteria mentioned above using methods of operational research. In this article, the following methods of multi-criteria decision-making analysis are applied: Weighted Sum Approach method and TOPSIS method. The results of the individual methods are compared and discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 626
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [2] A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Grading of Raw Jute
    Das, Subhasis
    Ghosh, Anindya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS, 2021, 18 (05) : 685 - 693
  • [3] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [4] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [5] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    [J]. MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [6] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision-making process for buildings
    Barcomb, JD
    Curtner, A
    [J]. 35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 528 - 535
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Linguistic Labels
    Mieszkowicz-Rolka, Alicja
    Rolka, Leszek
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2022, : 263 - 267
  • [9] CONSIDERING INTERACTIONS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Cancer, Vesna
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOR 09, 2009, : 151 - 156
  • [10] Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Craft, David
    van Haveren, Rens
    Heijmen, Ben
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 277 (01) : 1 - 19