Localized keyhole pore prediction during laser powder bed fusion via multimodal process monitoring and X-ray radiography

被引:3
|
作者
Gorgannejad, Sanam [1 ]
Martin, Aiden A. [1 ]
Nicolino, Jenny W. [1 ]
Strantza, Maria [1 ]
Guss, Gabriel M. [1 ]
Khairallah, Saad [1 ]
Forien, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Thampy, Vivek [2 ]
Liu, Sen [2 ]
Quan, Peiyu [2 ]
Tassone, Christopher J. [2 ]
Calta, Nicholas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Stanford Synchrotron Radiat Lightsource, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In situ monitoring; X-ray radiography; Keyhole pore identification; Sensor fusion; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; FAULT-DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; HCTSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2023.103810
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Systematic fault detection and control during laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has been a long-standing objective for system manufacturers and researchers in the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. This manuscript investigates a data fusion approach for detection of keyhole porosity formation during laser irradiation of Ti-6Al-4V substrates by concurrent recording of thermally induced optical emission measured using both off-axis and coaxial photodiode sensors, and acoustic emission. Subsurface defect formation was monitored via high-speed synchrotron X-ray imaging at 20,000 frames per second, enabling temporal registration of keyhole pore formation events to the monitoring signals at a resolution of 50 mu s. We developed data fusion machine learning (ML) models for localized prediction of keyhole pore formation at various time scales ranging from 0.5 ms to 2 ms. The signal segments were featurized using two independent approaches: (1) power spectral density (PSD) and (2) highly comparative time series analysis (HCTSA) framework. The extracted features from different sensor mo-dalities were fused together to construct a multimodal feature space and sequential feature selection was used to determine the most informative features for training the ML models. The predictive performance was evaluated for three classifying algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). As a result, pore formation events were predicted with up to 0.95 F1-score, 1.0 recall and 0.94 accuracy. The most heavily weighted features indicate that model performance is chiefly governed by the acoustic monitoring signal, with a secondary contribution from the optical emission sensors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Mitigating keyhole pore formation by nanoparticles during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Qu, Minglei
    Guo, Qilin
    Escano, Luis I.
    Clark, Samuel J.
    Fezzaa, Kamel
    Chen, Lianyi
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2022, 3
  • [12] Keyhole fluctuation and pore formation mechanisms during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Yuze Huang
    Tristan G. Fleming
    Samuel J. Clark
    Sebastian Marussi
    Kamel Fezzaa
    Jeyan Thiyagalingam
    Chu Lun Alex Leung
    Peter D. Lee
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [13] Deep-Learning-Based Segmentation of Keyhole in In-Situ X-ray Imaging of Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Dong, William
    Lian, Jason
    Yan, Chengpo
    Zhong, Yiran
    Karnati, Sumanth
    Guo, Qilin
    Chen, Lianyi
    Morgan, Dane
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (02)
  • [15] Formation mechanisms of lack of fusion and keyhole-induced pore defects in laser powder bed fusion process: A numerical study
    Yang, Xuan
    Li, Yazhi
    Li, Biao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2023, 188
  • [16] Defect-based analysis of the laser powder bed fusion process using X-ray data
    Nudelis, Natan
    Mayr, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 123 (9-10): : 3223 - 3232
  • [17] Defect-based analysis of the laser powder bed fusion process using X-ray data
    Natan Nudelis
    Peter Mayr
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 123 : 3223 - 3232
  • [18] Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process
    Acharya, Ranadip
    Sharon, John A.
    Staroselsky, Alexander
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2017, 124 : 360 - 371
  • [19] Deep learning-based monitoring of laser powder bed fusion process on variable time-scales using heterogeneous sensing and operando X-ray radiography guidance
    Pandiyan, Vigneashwara
    Masinelli, Giulio
    Claire, Navarre
    Tri Le-Quang
    Hamidi-Nasab, Milad
    de Formanoir, Charlotte
    Esmaeilzadeh, Reza
    Goel, Sneha
    Marone, Federica
    Loge, Roland
    Van Petegem, Steven
    Wasmer, Kilian
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 58
  • [20] X-ray tomography for the advancement of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Du Plessis, A.
    JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY, 2022, 285 (03) : 121 - 130