Localized keyhole pore prediction during laser powder bed fusion via multimodal process monitoring and X-ray radiography

被引:3
|
作者
Gorgannejad, Sanam [1 ]
Martin, Aiden A. [1 ]
Nicolino, Jenny W. [1 ]
Strantza, Maria [1 ]
Guss, Gabriel M. [1 ]
Khairallah, Saad [1 ]
Forien, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Thampy, Vivek [2 ]
Liu, Sen [2 ]
Quan, Peiyu [2 ]
Tassone, Christopher J. [2 ]
Calta, Nicholas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Stanford Synchrotron Radiat Lightsource, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In situ monitoring; X-ray radiography; Keyhole pore identification; Sensor fusion; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; FAULT-DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; HCTSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2023.103810
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Systematic fault detection and control during laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has been a long-standing objective for system manufacturers and researchers in the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. This manuscript investigates a data fusion approach for detection of keyhole porosity formation during laser irradiation of Ti-6Al-4V substrates by concurrent recording of thermally induced optical emission measured using both off-axis and coaxial photodiode sensors, and acoustic emission. Subsurface defect formation was monitored via high-speed synchrotron X-ray imaging at 20,000 frames per second, enabling temporal registration of keyhole pore formation events to the monitoring signals at a resolution of 50 mu s. We developed data fusion machine learning (ML) models for localized prediction of keyhole pore formation at various time scales ranging from 0.5 ms to 2 ms. The signal segments were featurized using two independent approaches: (1) power spectral density (PSD) and (2) highly comparative time series analysis (HCTSA) framework. The extracted features from different sensor mo-dalities were fused together to construct a multimodal feature space and sequential feature selection was used to determine the most informative features for training the ML models. The predictive performance was evaluated for three classifying algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). As a result, pore formation events were predicted with up to 0.95 F1-score, 1.0 recall and 0.94 accuracy. The most heavily weighted features indicate that model performance is chiefly governed by the acoustic monitoring signal, with a secondary contribution from the optical emission sensors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A 3D analytical modeling method for keyhole porosity prediction in laser powder bed fusion
    Wang, Wenjia
    Liang, Steven Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 120 (5-6): : 3017 - 3025
  • [42] Cooling dynamics of two titanium alloys during laser powder bed fusion probed with in situ X-ray imaging and diffraction
    Calta, Nicholas P.
    Thampy, Vivek
    Lee, Duncan R. C.
    Martin, Aiden A.
    Ganeriwala, Rishi
    Wang, Jenny
    Depond, Philip J.
    Roehling, Tien T.
    Fong, Anthony Y.
    Kiss, Andrew M.
    Tassone, Christopher J.
    Stone, Kevin H.
    Weker, Johanna Nelson
    Toney, Michael F.
    Van Buuren, Anthony W.
    Matthews, Manyalibo J.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2020, 195
  • [43] Revealing dynamic processes in laser powder bed fusion with in situ X-ray diffraction at PETRA III
    Krohmer, Erwin
    Schmeiser, Felix
    Wahlmann, Benjamin
    Rosigkeit, Jan
    Graf, Gloria
    Spoerk-Erdely, Petra
    Clemens, Helmut
    Staron, Peter
    Koerner, Carolin
    Reimers, Walter
    Uhlmann, Eckart
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2022, 93 (06):
  • [44] Direct observation of crack formation mechanisms with operando Laser Powder Bed Fusion X-ray imaging
    Ghasemi-Tabasi, Hossein E.
    de Formanoir, Charlotte
    Van Petegem, Steven
    Jhabvala, Jamasp
    Hocine, Samy
    Boillat, Eric
    Sohrabi, Navid
    Marone, Federica
    Grolimund, Daniel
    Van Swygenhoven, Helena
    Loge, Roland E.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 51
  • [45] Prediction of microstructure, residual stress, and deformation in laser powder bed fusion process
    Yang, Y. P.
    Jamshidinia, M.
    Boulware, P.
    Kelly, S. M.
    COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2018, 61 (05) : 599 - 615
  • [46] Machine learning-aided real-time detection of keyhole pore generation in laser powder bed fusion
    Ren, Zhongshu
    Gao, Lin
    Clark, Samuel J.
    Fezzaa, Kamel
    Shevchenko, Pavel
    Choi, Ann
    Everhart, Wes
    Rollett, Anthony D.
    Chen, Lianyi
    Sun, Tao
    SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6627) : 89 - 93
  • [47] Prediction of microstructure, residual stress, and deformation in laser powder bed fusion process
    Y. P. Yang
    M. Jamshidinia
    P. Boulware
    S. M. Kelly
    Computational Mechanics, 2018, 61 : 599 - 615
  • [48] Oxide and spatter powder formation during laser powder bed fusion of Hastelloy X
    Gasper, A. N. D.
    Hickman, D.
    Ashcroft, I.
    Sharma, S.
    Wang, X.
    Szost, B.
    Johns, D.
    Clare, A. T.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 354 : 333 - 337
  • [49] Grain Growth During Keyhole Mode Pulsed Laser Powder Bed Fusion of IN738LC
    Z. W. Chen
    T. Guraya
    S. Singamneni
    M. A. L. Phan
    JOM, 2020, 72 : 1074 - 1084
  • [50] Grain Growth During Keyhole Mode Pulsed Laser Powder Bed Fusion of IN738LC
    Chen, Z. W.
    Guraya, T.
    Singamneni, S.
    Phan, M. A. L.
    JOM, 2020, 72 (03) : 1074 - 1084