Localized keyhole pore prediction during laser powder bed fusion via multimodal process monitoring and X-ray radiography

被引:3
|
作者
Gorgannejad, Sanam [1 ]
Martin, Aiden A. [1 ]
Nicolino, Jenny W. [1 ]
Strantza, Maria [1 ]
Guss, Gabriel M. [1 ]
Khairallah, Saad [1 ]
Forien, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Thampy, Vivek [2 ]
Liu, Sen [2 ]
Quan, Peiyu [2 ]
Tassone, Christopher J. [2 ]
Calta, Nicholas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Stanford Synchrotron Radiat Lightsource, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In situ monitoring; X-ray radiography; Keyhole pore identification; Sensor fusion; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; FAULT-DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; HCTSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2023.103810
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Systematic fault detection and control during laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has been a long-standing objective for system manufacturers and researchers in the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. This manuscript investigates a data fusion approach for detection of keyhole porosity formation during laser irradiation of Ti-6Al-4V substrates by concurrent recording of thermally induced optical emission measured using both off-axis and coaxial photodiode sensors, and acoustic emission. Subsurface defect formation was monitored via high-speed synchrotron X-ray imaging at 20,000 frames per second, enabling temporal registration of keyhole pore formation events to the monitoring signals at a resolution of 50 mu s. We developed data fusion machine learning (ML) models for localized prediction of keyhole pore formation at various time scales ranging from 0.5 ms to 2 ms. The signal segments were featurized using two independent approaches: (1) power spectral density (PSD) and (2) highly comparative time series analysis (HCTSA) framework. The extracted features from different sensor mo-dalities were fused together to construct a multimodal feature space and sequential feature selection was used to determine the most informative features for training the ML models. The predictive performance was evaluated for three classifying algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). As a result, pore formation events were predicted with up to 0.95 F1-score, 1.0 recall and 0.94 accuracy. The most heavily weighted features indicate that model performance is chiefly governed by the acoustic monitoring signal, with a secondary contribution from the optical emission sensors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detecting keyhole pore defects and monitoring process signatures during laser powder bed fusion: A correlation between in situ pyrometry and ex situ X-ray radiography
    Forien, Jean-Baptiste
    Calta, Nicholas P.
    DePond, Philip J.
    Guss, Gabe M.
    Roehling, Tien T.
    Matthews, Manyalibo J.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 35
  • [2] Sensor fusion of pyrometry and acoustic measurements for localized keyhole pore identification in laser powder bed fusion
    Tempelman, Joshua R.
    Wachtor, Adam J.
    Flynn, Eric B.
    Depond, Phillip J.
    Forien, Jean -Baptiste
    Guss, Gabe M.
    Calta, Nicholas P.
    Matthews, Manyalibo J.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 308
  • [3] Detection of keyhole pore formations in laser powder-bed fusion using acoustic process monitoring measurements
    Tempelman, Joshua R.
    Wachtor, Adam J.
    Flynn, Eric B.
    Depond, Phillip J.
    Forien, Jean-Baptiste
    Guss, Gabe M.
    Calta, Nicholas P.
    Matthews, Manyalibo J.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 55
  • [4] On the use of X-ray computed tomography for the improvement of metal laser powder bed fusion process monitoring
    Bonato, Nicolò
    Zanini, Filippo
    Carmignato, Simone
    e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2023, 28 (03):
  • [5] Formation of keyhole and lack of fusion pores during the laser powder bed fusion process
    Shrestha, Subin
    Chou, Kevin
    MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2022, 32 : 19 - 23
  • [6] A Numerical Study on the Keyhole Formation During Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process
    Shrestha, Subin
    Chou, Y. Kevin
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2019, 141 (10):
  • [7] A NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE KEYHOLE FORMATION DURING LASER POWDER BED FUSION PROCESS
    Shrestha, Subin
    Chou, Y. Kevin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 14TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 1, 2019,
  • [8] Analytical prediction of keyhole porosity in laser powder bed fusion
    Wang, Wenjia
    Ning, Jinqiang
    Liang, Steven Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 119 (11-12): : 6995 - 7002
  • [9] Analytical prediction of keyhole porosity in laser powder bed fusion
    Wenjia Wang
    Jinqiang Ning
    Steven Y. Liang
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 119 : 6995 - 7002
  • [10] Keyhole fluctuation and pore formation mechanisms during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Huang, Yuze
    Fleming, Tristan G.
    Clark, Samuel J.
    Marussi, Sebastian
    Fezzaa, Kamel
    Thiyagalingam, Jeyan
    Leung, Chu Lun Alex
    Lee, Peter D.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)