Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT Lymphangiography to Quantify Thoracic Duct Lymphatic Flow

被引:1
|
作者
Molloi, Sabee [1 ]
Polivka, Alesh R. [1 ]
Zhao, Yixiao [1 ]
Redmond, Jonas [3 ]
Itkin, Maxim [4 ]
Antunes, Ines [1 ]
Yu, Zhaoxia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Med Sci 1,B-140, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Stat, Med Sci 1,B-140, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol Sci, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
MR LYMPHANGIOGRAPHY; VENOUS-PRESSURE; GADOFOSVESET; DIAGNOSIS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.230959
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: CT lymphangiography has been used to image the lymphatic anatomy and assess lymphatic abnormalities. There is, however, a need to develop a method for quantification of lymphatic flow rate in the thoracic duct (TD). Purpose: To develop and validate a TD lymphatic flow measurement technique using dynamic contrast -enhanced CT lymphangiography. Materials and Methods: Lymphatic flow rate was measured with two techniques: a first -pass analysis technique based on a single compartment model and a thresholding technique distinguishing between opacified and nonopacified voxels within the TD. The measurements were validated in a swine animal model between November 2021 and September 2022. CT images were acquired at 100 kV and 200 mA using a fast -pitched helical scan mode covering the entire TD following contrast material injection into the bilateral inguinal lymph nodes. Two helical CT scans, acquired at the base and peak contrast enhancement of the TD, were used to measure lymphatic flow rate. A US flow probe surgically placed around the TD provided the reference standard measurement. CT lymphatic flow measurements were compared with the reference US flow probe measurements using regression and Bland -Altman analysis. Repeatability was determined using repeated flow measurements within approximately 10 minutes of each other. Results: Eleven swine (10 male; mean weight, 43.6 kg +/- 2.6 [SD]) were evaluated with 71 dynamic CT acquisitions. The lymphatic flow rates measured using the first -pass analysis and thresholding techniques were highly correlated with the reference US flow probe measurements (r = 0.99 and 0.91, respectively) and showed good agreement with the reference standard, with Bland -Altman analysis showing small mean differences of 0.04 and 0.05 mL/min, respectively. The first -pass analysis and thresholding techniques also showed good agreement for repeated flow measurements (r = 0.94 and 0.90, respectively), with small mean differences of 0.09 and 0.03 mL/min, respectively. Conclusion: The first -pass analysis and thresholding techniques could be used to accurately and noninvasively quantify TD lymphatic flow using dynamic contrast -enhanced CT lymphangiography.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric consequences of contrast-enhanced CT planning for thoracic radiotherapy
    Lalondrelle, S.
    Jones, M.
    Barnard, A.
    Illsley, M.
    Ezhil, V.
    LUNG CANCER, 2010, 67 : S35 - S36
  • [32] Can Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Quantify Perfusion in a Stimulated Muscle of Limited Size? A Rat Model
    Walker, John A.
    Walters, Thomas J.
    Parker, Matthew D.
    Wenke, Joseph C.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (01) : 179 - 188
  • [33] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the patellar bone: How to quantify perfusion
    Poot, Dirk H. J.
    van der Heijden, Rianne A.
    van Middelkoop, Marienke
    Oei, Edwin H. G.
    Klein, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (03) : 848 - 858
  • [34] Ultrasound-guided needle positioning for nodal dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography
    J. Wagenpfeil
    P. A. Kupczyk
    A. Henkel
    S. Geiger
    T. Köster
    J. A. Luetkens
    H. H. Schild
    U. I. Attenberger
    C. C. Pieper
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [35] Ultrasound-guided needle positioning for nodal dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography
    Wagenpfeil, J.
    Kupczyk, P. A.
    Henkel, A.
    Geiger, S.
    Koester, T.
    Luetkens, J. A.
    Schild, H. H.
    Attenberger, U. I.
    Pieper, C. C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [36] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
    Eriksen, Rie O.
    Strauch, Louise S.
    Sandgaard, Michael
    Kristensen, Thomas S.
    Nielsen, Michael B.
    Lauridsen, Carsten A.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2016, 6 (03)
  • [37] Contrast-Enhanced Dynamic MRI of Brain Lymphatic Vessels: A Feasibility Study
    Gabr, R.
    Lincoln, J.
    Hasan, K.
    Kramer, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E641 - E641
  • [38] Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI
    O'Connor, J. P. B.
    Tofts, P. S.
    Miles, K. A.
    Parkes, L. M.
    Thompson, G.
    Jackson, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 : S112 - S120
  • [39] Comparative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, and their combination for adrenal tumor diagnosis in men
    Yan, Minghui
    Wang, Yanan
    Jiao, Lianghong
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2024, 20 (07) : 113 - 119
  • [40] Validation of the Position of Injection Needles with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Dynamic Contract-Enhanced MR Lymphangiography
    Nadolski, Gregory J.
    Dolores Ponce-Dorrego, Maria
    Darge, Kassa
    Biko, David M.
    Itkin, Maxim
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (07) : 1028 - 1030