The effect of different orthodontic mini-implant brands and geometry on primary stability (an in vitro study)

被引:0
|
作者
Abdalla, Khanda Latif [1 ]
Mahmood, Trefa Mohammed Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sulaimani, Coll Dent, Dept Pedodont Orthodont & Prevent Dent, Sulaimanyah, Iraq
关键词
Orthodontic mini -implant; Primary stability; Geometry; PULL-OUT STRENGTH; DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS; INSERTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19858
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: In orthodontic procedures, mini-implants are routinely used as temporary anchorage devices. Early failure is primarily attributed to a variety of issues, which are mostly connected to the quality and geometry of the screw that lead to insufficient primary stability. Objectives: To evaluate the primary stability of different sizes and brands of orthodontic miniimplants by optimizing the insertion torque value (ITV) and to clear out which one has the greatest primary stability among the most widely used mini-implants by orthodontists. Methods: Eighty-two self-drilling mini-implants from three different brands with different sizes were used (Optimus Ortho System (Osteonic made in Korea), Smart anchor (GNI made in Korea) (1.4 x 6, 1.6 x 8 and 1.8 x 10mm) and Morelli (made in Brazil) (1.5 x 6, 1.5 x 8 and 1.5 x 10mm), made from (Ti 6Al 4V). All were drilled at a 60 degrees angle on Sixty artificial bone blocks made from polyurethane foam with a digital torque meter device (Orthonia, Jeil made in Korea), pullout strength (tensile force) was measured with a universal testing machine to find out the best brand and size in the mean of primary stability. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25 and JMP Pro Version 16 software using the One-way ANOVA test, the Post hoc and Tukey HCD tests. Results: There were significant differences between the pullout strength of different sizes for the GNI and OSTEONIC brands, while for the MORELLI brand there were no significant differences between the three different sizes considering ITV (10Ncm) whereas for ITV (20Ncm) there was a significant difference between the different sizes for the pullout of all three brands. GNI was the best brand for all the selected sizes with ITV (10Ncm) and size 1.4 x 6 for ITV (20Ncm), whereas OSTEONIC sizes 1.6 x 8 and 1.8 x 10 were the best for ITV (20Ncm) in term of primary stability. Conclusion: GNI screws were demonstrated higher primary among the three widely used brands followed by OSTEONIC for size 1.6 x 8 and 1.8 x 10 while MORELLI was the least resistant to dislodgement for the two torque insertion values 10 N/cm and 20 N/cm.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of healing time before loading on orthodontic mini-implant stability: A histomorphometric study in minipigs
    Oltramari-Navarro, Paula V. P.
    Navarro, Ricardo L.
    Henriques, Jose Fernando C.
    Cestari, Tania M.
    Francischone, Carlos E.
    Taga, Rumio
    McNamara, James A., Jr.
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (07) : 806 - 812
  • [22] Mechanical stability assessment of novel orthodontic mini-implant designs: Part 2
    Hong, Christine
    Peter Truong
    Ha Na Song
    Wu, Benjamin M.
    Moon, Won
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (06) : 1001 - 1009
  • [23] Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants
    Pan, Chin-Yun
    Chou, Szu-Ting
    Tseng, Yu-Chuan
    Yang, Yi-Hsin
    Wu, Chao-Yi
    Lan, Ting-Hsun
    Liu, Pao-Hsin
    Chang, Hong-Po
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 28 (12): : 673 - 678
  • [24] The effect of varying healing times on orthodontic mini-implant stability: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis
    Zhang, Qiang
    Zhao, Lixing
    Wu, Yeke
    Wang, Hui
    Zhao, Zhihe
    Xu, Zhenrui
    Wei, Xing
    Tang, Tian
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2011, 112 (04): : 423 - 429
  • [25] Advances in orthodontic anchorage with the use of mini-implant techniques
    R. R. J. Cousley
    P. J. Sandler
    British Dental Journal, 2015, 218 : E4 - E4
  • [26] A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case
    Ohnishi, H
    Yagi, T
    Yasuda, Y
    Takada, K
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2005, 75 (03) : 444 - 452
  • [27] Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: A microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis
    Zhao, Lixing
    Xu, Zhenrui
    Yang, Zhi
    Wei, Xing
    Tang, Tian
    Zhao, Zhihe
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 108 (02): : 196 - 202
  • [28] A novel technique for measurement of orthodontic mini-implant stability using the Osstell ISQ device
    Hosein, Yara K.
    Dixon, S. Jeffrey
    Rizkalla, Amin S.
    Tassi, Ali
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2019, 89 (02) : 284 - 291
  • [29] Orthodontic Mini-Implant Stability under Continuous or Intermittent Loading: A Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis
    Wu, Yeke
    Xu, Zhenrui
    Tan, Luyuan
    Tan, Lijun
    Zhao, Zhihe
    Yang, Pu
    Li, Yu
    Tang, Tian
    Zhao, Lixing
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (01) : 163 - 172
  • [30] Primary stability and viscoelastic displacement of mini-implant system under loading
    Lee, Jim
    Jeong, Yong-Hoon
    Pittman, Joseph
    Deguchi, Toru
    Johnston, William M.
    Fields, Henry W.
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2017, 41 : 28 - 33