The effect of different orthodontic mini-implant brands and geometry on primary stability (an in vitro study)

被引:0
|
作者
Abdalla, Khanda Latif [1 ]
Mahmood, Trefa Mohammed Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sulaimani, Coll Dent, Dept Pedodont Orthodont & Prevent Dent, Sulaimanyah, Iraq
关键词
Orthodontic mini -implant; Primary stability; Geometry; PULL-OUT STRENGTH; DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS; INSERTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19858
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: In orthodontic procedures, mini-implants are routinely used as temporary anchorage devices. Early failure is primarily attributed to a variety of issues, which are mostly connected to the quality and geometry of the screw that lead to insufficient primary stability. Objectives: To evaluate the primary stability of different sizes and brands of orthodontic miniimplants by optimizing the insertion torque value (ITV) and to clear out which one has the greatest primary stability among the most widely used mini-implants by orthodontists. Methods: Eighty-two self-drilling mini-implants from three different brands with different sizes were used (Optimus Ortho System (Osteonic made in Korea), Smart anchor (GNI made in Korea) (1.4 x 6, 1.6 x 8 and 1.8 x 10mm) and Morelli (made in Brazil) (1.5 x 6, 1.5 x 8 and 1.5 x 10mm), made from (Ti 6Al 4V). All were drilled at a 60 degrees angle on Sixty artificial bone blocks made from polyurethane foam with a digital torque meter device (Orthonia, Jeil made in Korea), pullout strength (tensile force) was measured with a universal testing machine to find out the best brand and size in the mean of primary stability. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25 and JMP Pro Version 16 software using the One-way ANOVA test, the Post hoc and Tukey HCD tests. Results: There were significant differences between the pullout strength of different sizes for the GNI and OSTEONIC brands, while for the MORELLI brand there were no significant differences between the three different sizes considering ITV (10Ncm) whereas for ITV (20Ncm) there was a significant difference between the different sizes for the pullout of all three brands. GNI was the best brand for all the selected sizes with ITV (10Ncm) and size 1.4 x 6 for ITV (20Ncm), whereas OSTEONIC sizes 1.6 x 8 and 1.8 x 10 were the best for ITV (20Ncm) in term of primary stability. Conclusion: GNI screws were demonstrated higher primary among the three widely used brands followed by OSTEONIC for size 1.6 x 8 and 1.8 x 10 while MORELLI was the least resistant to dislodgement for the two torque insertion values 10 N/cm and 20 N/cm.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative assessment of orthodontic mini-implant displacement: The effect of initial force application
    Holst, Alexandra Ioana
    Karl, Matthias
    Karolczak, Marek
    Goellner, Matthias
    Holst, Stefan
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 41 (01): : 59 - 66
  • [32] Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels
    Chatzigianni, Athina
    Keilig, Ludger
    Reimann, Susanne
    Eliades, Theodore
    Bourauel, Christoph
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 381 - 387
  • [33] Bivariate optimization of orthodontic mini-implant thread height and pitch
    Shen, Shuning
    Sun, Yingying
    Zhang, Chen
    Yang, Yongjin
    Li, Zhiren
    Cai, Xingwei
    Duan, Yinzhong
    Li, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2015, 10 (01) : 109 - 116
  • [34] Effect of Splinting on Orthodontic Mini-Implant Tipping and Bone Histomorphometric Parameters: An In Vivo Animal Model Study
    Fontes, Joana
    Martin, Victor Zacharias
    Resende, Marta
    Colaco, Bruno
    Gomes, Pedro de Sousa
    Amarante, Jose Manuel
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [35] Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant
    Motoyoshi, M
    Hirabayashi, M
    Uemura, M
    Shimizu, N
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [36] Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
    Manuel Nienkemper
    Jörg Handschel
    Dieter Drescher
    International Journal of Oral Science, 2014, 6 : 1 - 6
  • [37] Effects of gripping volume in the mechanical strengths of orthodontic mini-implant
    Tseng, Yu-Chuan
    Wu, Ju-Hui
    Chen, Hong-Sen
    Chen, Chun-Ming
    Ting, Chun-Chan
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 33 (11): : 578 - 583
  • [38] Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
    Nienkemper, Manuel
    Handschel, Joerg
    Drescher, Dieter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2014, 6 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [39] Biomechanical evaluation of an orthodontic mini-implant with plastic removal cap: an in-vitro experimental testing
    Lin, Yang-Sung
    Lin, Chun-Li
    Chang, Wen-Jen
    Chang, Yen-Hsiang
    Yu, Jian-Hong
    Chang, Yau-Zen
    2013 35TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2013, : 3183 - 3185
  • [40] Summary of: Advances in orthodontic anchorage with the use of mini-implant techniques
    Cousley, R. R. J.
    Sandler, P. J.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2015, 218 (03) : 178 - 179