Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study

被引:3
|
作者
Bejrananda, Tanan [1 ]
Takahara, Kiyoshi [2 ]
Sowanthip, Dutsadee [3 ]
Motonaga, Tomonari [2 ]
Yagi, Kota [2 ]
Nakamura, Wataru [2 ]
Saruta, Masanobu [2 ]
Nukaya, Takuhisa [2 ]
Takenaka, Masashi [2 ]
Zennami, Kenji [2 ]
Ichino, Manabu [2 ]
Sasaki, Hitomi [2 ]
Sumitomo, Makoto [2 ]
Shiroki, Ryoichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Div Urol, Thai Red Cross Soc,Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; CONTINENCE; JAPANESE; PROPOSAL; RATES; MEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-43092-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Pentafecta (continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no complications) is an important outcome of prostatectomy. Our objective was to assess the pentafecta achievement between nerve-spring and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a large single-center cohort. The study included 1674 patients treated with RARP between August 2009 and November 2022 to assess the clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RARP for pentafecta achievement, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing to test the validity of the results. Pentafecta definition included continence, which was defined as the use of zero pads; potency, which was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections or ones firm enough for sexual activity and sexual intercourse. The biochemical recurrence rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels>0.2 ng/mL after RARP; 90-day Clavien-Dindo complications <= 3a; and a negative surgical pathologic margin. The median follow-up period was 61.3 months (IQR 6-159 months). A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pentafecta achievement was significantly associated with nerve-sparing (NS) approach (1188 patients) (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.51-6.9), p<0.001), unilateral nerve preservation (983 patients) (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.31-6.37, p<0.001) and bilateral nerve preservation (205 patients) (OR 7.43; 95% CI 4.14-13.36, p<0.001). After propensity matching, pentafecta achievement rates in the NS (476 patients) and non-NS (476 patients) groups were 72 (15.1%) and 19 (4%), respectively. (p<0.001). NS in RARP offers a superior advantage in pentafecta achievement compared with non-NS RARP. This validation study provides the pentafecta outcome after RARP associated with nerve-sparing in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study
    Tanan Bejrananda
    Kiyoshi Takahara
    Dutsadee Sowanthip
    Tomonari Motonaga
    Kota Yagi
    Wataru Nakamura
    Masanobu Saruta
    Takuhisa Nukaya
    Masashi Takenaka
    Kenji Zennami
    Manabu Ichino
    Hitomi Sasaki
    Makoto Sumitomo
    Ryoichi Shiroki
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] IMPACT OF NERVE SPARING ON POSTOPERATIVE CONTINENCE FOLLOWING ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED STUDY
    Kumar, Anup
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Hariharan, P. G.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E554 - E554
  • [3] Modified Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for cases with anterior tumor: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Qian, Jiajun
    Fu, Yao
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Zhang, Feifei
    Wu, Xiao
    Li, Danyan
    Xu, Linfeng
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Gan, Weidong
    Guo, Hongqian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [4] Outcomes of Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Morbidly Obese: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Agrawal, Vineet
    Feng, Changyong
    Joseph, Jean
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (06) : 677 - 682
  • [5] An updated approach to incremental nerve sparing for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Martini, Alberto
    Cumarasamy, Shivaram
    Haines, Kenneth G., III
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [6] Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives
    Kumar, Anup
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Panaiyadiyan, Sridhar
    Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Nayak, Brusabhanu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 2 - 13
  • [7] Nerve-sparing techniques and results in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Tavukcu, Hasan Huseyin
    Aytac, Omer
    Atug, Fatih
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2016, 57 : S172 - S184
  • [8] Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives
    Anup Kumar
    Vipul RPatel
    Sridhar Panaiyadiyan
    Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
    Marcio Covas Moschovas
    Brusabhanu Nayak
    Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, (01) : 2 - 13
  • [9] PREDICTORS OF COMPLETE NERVE SPARING DURING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Schatloff, O.
    Sivaraman, A.
    Chauhan, S.
    Giedelman, C.
    Samavedi, S.
    Abdul-Muhsin, H.
    Coelho, R.
    Rocco, B.
    Palmer, K.
    Patel, V
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 22 - 24
  • [10] Selection of patients for nerve sparing surgery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Vis, Andre N.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Mottrie, Alexander
    Stricker, Philip D.
    Graefen, Marcus
    Patel, Vipul
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2022, 3 (01): : 6 - 18