Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study

被引:3
|
作者
Bejrananda, Tanan [1 ]
Takahara, Kiyoshi [2 ]
Sowanthip, Dutsadee [3 ]
Motonaga, Tomonari [2 ]
Yagi, Kota [2 ]
Nakamura, Wataru [2 ]
Saruta, Masanobu [2 ]
Nukaya, Takuhisa [2 ]
Takenaka, Masashi [2 ]
Zennami, Kenji [2 ]
Ichino, Manabu [2 ]
Sasaki, Hitomi [2 ]
Sumitomo, Makoto [2 ]
Shiroki, Ryoichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Div Urol, Thai Red Cross Soc,Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; CONTINENCE; JAPANESE; PROPOSAL; RATES; MEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-43092-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Pentafecta (continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no complications) is an important outcome of prostatectomy. Our objective was to assess the pentafecta achievement between nerve-spring and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a large single-center cohort. The study included 1674 patients treated with RARP between August 2009 and November 2022 to assess the clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RARP for pentafecta achievement, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing to test the validity of the results. Pentafecta definition included continence, which was defined as the use of zero pads; potency, which was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections or ones firm enough for sexual activity and sexual intercourse. The biochemical recurrence rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels>0.2 ng/mL after RARP; 90-day Clavien-Dindo complications <= 3a; and a negative surgical pathologic margin. The median follow-up period was 61.3 months (IQR 6-159 months). A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pentafecta achievement was significantly associated with nerve-sparing (NS) approach (1188 patients) (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.51-6.9), p<0.001), unilateral nerve preservation (983 patients) (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.31-6.37, p<0.001) and bilateral nerve preservation (205 patients) (OR 7.43; 95% CI 4.14-13.36, p<0.001). After propensity matching, pentafecta achievement rates in the NS (476 patients) and non-NS (476 patients) groups were 72 (15.1%) and 19 (4%), respectively. (p<0.001). NS in RARP offers a superior advantage in pentafecta achievement compared with non-NS RARP. This validation study provides the pentafecta outcome after RARP associated with nerve-sparing in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Role of the Prostatic Vasculature as a Landmark for Nerve Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Valero, Rair
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Kameh, Darian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (03) : 571 - 576
  • [32] Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies
    Potdevin, Lindsay
    Ercolani, Matt
    Jeong, Jeongyun
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (09) : 1479 - 1484
  • [33] Open radical prostatectomy reproducing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Involving antegrade nerve sparing and continuous anastomosis
    Kwon, Se Yun
    Lee, Jun Nyung
    Ha, Yun-Sok
    Choi, Seock Hwan
    Kim, Tae-Hwan
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2017, 43 (06): : 1043 - 1051
  • [34] Open radical prostatectomy reproducing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Involving antegrade nerve sparing and continuous anastomosis
    Lee, Kyung Seop
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    Kim, Tae-Hwan
    Kwon, Se Yun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 76 - 76
  • [35] Techniques of Nerve-Sparing and Potency Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2010, 36 (03): : 259 - 271
  • [36] Re: Stepwise Approach for Nerve Sparing Without Countertraction During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Technique and Outcomes
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Qazi, Hasan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (03) : 621 - 621
  • [37] Comparing Revo-i and da Vinci in Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Preliminary Propensity Score Analysis of Outcomes
    Alip, Sylvia
    Koukourikis, Periklis
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Na, Joon Chae
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (01) : 104 - 110
  • [38] Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the HUGO™ robot-assisted surgery system using the 'Aalst technique'
    Paciotti, Marco
    Bravi, Carlo A.
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Nocera, Luigi
    Sarchi, Luca
    Piro, Adele
    Farinha, Rui
    Peraire Lores, Maria
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Piramide, Federico
    Roussel, Eduard
    De Backer, Pieter
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    De Naeyer, Geert
    De Groote, Ruben
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (02) : 227 - 230
  • [39] ANTEGRADE VS RETROGRADE NERVE SPARING IN ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Muhsin, Haidar Abdul
    Ko, Young
    Giedelman, Camilo
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Coelho, Rafael
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Alnasari, Abdulla
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A463 - A463
  • [40] PREDICTORS OF COMPLETE NERVE SPARING DURING ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Giedelman, Camilo
    Muhsin, Haidar Abdul
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Kameh, Darian
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A308 - A309