Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study

被引:3
|
作者
Bejrananda, Tanan [1 ]
Takahara, Kiyoshi [2 ]
Sowanthip, Dutsadee [3 ]
Motonaga, Tomonari [2 ]
Yagi, Kota [2 ]
Nakamura, Wataru [2 ]
Saruta, Masanobu [2 ]
Nukaya, Takuhisa [2 ]
Takenaka, Masashi [2 ]
Zennami, Kenji [2 ]
Ichino, Manabu [2 ]
Sasaki, Hitomi [2 ]
Sumitomo, Makoto [2 ]
Shiroki, Ryoichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Div Urol, Thai Red Cross Soc,Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; CONTINENCE; JAPANESE; PROPOSAL; RATES; MEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-43092-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Pentafecta (continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no complications) is an important outcome of prostatectomy. Our objective was to assess the pentafecta achievement between nerve-spring and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a large single-center cohort. The study included 1674 patients treated with RARP between August 2009 and November 2022 to assess the clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RARP for pentafecta achievement, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing to test the validity of the results. Pentafecta definition included continence, which was defined as the use of zero pads; potency, which was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections or ones firm enough for sexual activity and sexual intercourse. The biochemical recurrence rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels>0.2 ng/mL after RARP; 90-day Clavien-Dindo complications <= 3a; and a negative surgical pathologic margin. The median follow-up period was 61.3 months (IQR 6-159 months). A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pentafecta achievement was significantly associated with nerve-sparing (NS) approach (1188 patients) (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.51-6.9), p<0.001), unilateral nerve preservation (983 patients) (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.31-6.37, p<0.001) and bilateral nerve preservation (205 patients) (OR 7.43; 95% CI 4.14-13.36, p<0.001). After propensity matching, pentafecta achievement rates in the NS (476 patients) and non-NS (476 patients) groups were 72 (15.1%) and 19 (4%), respectively. (p<0.001). NS in RARP offers a superior advantage in pentafecta achievement compared with non-NS RARP. This validation study provides the pentafecta outcome after RARP associated with nerve-sparing in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nerve-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - anatomical approach
    Czarnogorski, Michal C.
    Settaf-Cherif, Layla
    Koper, Krzysztof
    Petrasz, Piotr
    Ostrowski, Adam
    Juszczak, Kajetan
    Drewa, Tomasz
    Adamowicz, Jan
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2024, 21 (12) : 1101 - 1110
  • [22] Nerve-sparing Techniques During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Clips
    Zhu, Alec
    Basourakos, Spyridon P.
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 104 - 105
  • [23] NERVE-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE AALST-TECHNIQUE
    Borghese, M.
    Ficarra, V.
    Schatteman, P.
    Mottrie, A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A521 - A522
  • [24] Erratum to: Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon
    Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos
    Roberto Miano
    Nicola Di Lorenzo
    Enrico Spera
    Giuseppe Vespasiani
    Camille Mugnier
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 3955 - 3955
  • [25] Clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing vs. non-nerve sparing for high-risk prostate cancer cases
    Takahara, Kiyoshi
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    Fukaya, Kosuke
    Jyoudai, Takahito
    Nishino, Masashi
    Hikichi, Masaru
    Zennami, Kenji
    Nukaya, Takuhisa
    Ichino, Manabu
    Fukami, Naohiko
    Sasaki, Hitomi
    Kusaka, Mamoru
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 18 (04) : 3896 - 3902
  • [26] DOES DEHYDRATED AMNIOTIC/CHORION HUMAN MEMBRANE (DACHM), ACCELERATES THE RETURN TO POTENCY FOLLOWING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY REGARDLESS THE DEGREE OF NERVE SPARING?: PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED ANALYSIS
    Ogaya-Pinies, Gabriel
    Ganapathi, Hariharan Palayapalayam
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Woodlief, Tracey
    Rogers, Travis
    Jenson, Cathy
    Patel, Vipul R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E758 - E758
  • [27] Stepwise Approach for Nerve Sparing Without Countertraction During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Technique and Outcomes
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Huang, Andy C.
    Hevelone, Nathanael D.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Yu, Hua-yin
    Ulmer, William D.
    Kaplan, Joshua R.
    Patel, Sunil
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (03) : 536 - 547
  • [28] Modified Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for cases with anterior tumor: A propensity score matched analysis
    Qian, J.
    Fu, Y.
    Marra, G.
    Zhang, F.
    Wu, X.
    Li, D.
    Xu, L.
    Qiu, X.
    Gan, W.
    Guo, H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S2018 - S2018
  • [29] Long-term Outcomes of Prostate Capsule-Sparing and Nerve-Sparing Radical Cystectomy With Neobladder: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison
    Zhu, Zaisheng
    Zhu, Yiyi
    Shi, Hongqi
    Zhou, Penfei
    Xue, Yadong
    Hu, Shengye
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 28 (04) : 270 - 277
  • [30] INTRAFASCIAL NERVE SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: OUR INITIAL EXPERIENCE
    Porpiglia, F.
    Fiori, C.
    Chiarissi, M. Lucci
    Manfredi, M.
    Grande, S.
    Scarpa, R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A253 - A253