Outcomes of Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Morbidly Obese: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

被引:10
|
作者
Agrawal, Vineet [1 ]
Feng, Changyong [2 ]
Joseph, Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sect Laparoscop & Robot Surg, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; IMPACT; COMPLICATIONS; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1089/end.2014.0661
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: An increasing number of obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m(2)]) with localized prostate cancer are presenting as candidates for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), which can be carried out using the transperitoneal or the extraperitoneal (EP) approach. Morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m(2)) patients present as an especially challenging surgical cohort. We sought to evaluate the perioperative and pathologic outcomes associated with EP-RARP in morbidly obese men. Materials and Methods: In this institutional review board-approved study, our prospectively collected database (Cancer Information Systems [CAISIS]) was reviewed. One thousand six hundred sixty-three patients underwent EP-RARP for localized prostate cancer at our institution between July 2003 and December 2013 by a single surgeon. Forty patients were considered morbidly obese. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed using multivariate analysis incorporating 10 covariates to identify the comparable group of patients with a BMI of >40 kg/m(2) and Results: Apart from BMI, the two groups were matched (all p-values >0.05). Despite a higher total operating time and estimated blood loss (EBL) in the morbidly obese (238 vs 176 minutes, p<0.0001, and 235 vs 192 mL, p=0.003, respectively), there were no differences in the ability to perform nerve-sparing or pelvic lymphadenectomy, or the length of stay. While the morbidly obese had a higher rate of harboring more aggressive disease on final pathology (pT3 rates, 27.5 vs 7.5%, respectively), there were no differences in other postoperative pathologic parameters, such as prostate specimen weight, positive surgical margin status, and Gleason score sum. Moreover, there were no differences in intra- or postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: The morbidly obese cohort harbored more aggressive disease with the difference in the proportion of pathologic T3 disease statistically significant. Apart from increased total operating time and EBL in the morbid obese, EP-RARP leads to comparable perioperative and pathologic outcomes to the nonmorbidly obese. Consideration should be given to added operating room time when operating on the morbidly obese.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 682
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perioperative and early oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in morbidly obese patients: a propensity score-matched study
    Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar
    Giedelman, Camilo
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Coelho, Rafael
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Ebra, George
    Patel, Vipul
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (01) : 84 - 91
  • [2] Comparison of functional outcomes between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison study
    Ku, Ja Yoon
    Lee, Chan Ho
    Lee, Jeong Zoo
    Ha, Hong Koo
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [3] COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED COMPARISON STUDY
    Ku, JaYoon
    Lee, ChanHo
    Lee, Kyoung
    Kim, KyungHwan
    Lee, Sang Don
    Chung, Moon Kee
    Ha, HongKoo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1237 - E1238
  • [4] EXTRAPERITONEAL VS. TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE MORBIDLY OBESE
    Horovitz, David
    Sun, Hao
    Feng, Changyong
    Messing, Edward
    Joseph, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1242 - E1242
  • [5] Single-Port Extraperitoneal vs. Multiport Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Mikesell, Carter D.
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. CANCERS, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [6] LYMPHOCELE FOLLOWING EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING STUDY
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Kim, Kyu Hyun
    Park, Jae Won
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Yu, Ho Song
    Lee, Hye Young
    Cho, Kang Su
    Ham, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E574 - E575
  • [7] hinotori™ vs. da Vinci®: propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kohjimoto, Yasuo
    Yamashita, Shimpei
    Iwagami, Sohei
    Muraoka, Satoshi
    Wakamiya, Takahito
    Hara, Isao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [8] hinotoriTM vs. da Vinci®: propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Yasuo Kohjimoto
    Shimpei Yamashita
    Sohei Iwagami
    Satoshi Muraoka
    Takahito Wakamiya
    Isao Hara
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 18
  • [9] Lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-matching study
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Cho, Kang Su
    Yu, Ho Song
    Chung, Jae Seung
    Ham, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 1169 - 1176
  • [10] Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study
    Bejrananda, Tanan
    Takahara, Kiyoshi
    Sowanthip, Dutsadee
    Motonaga, Tomonari
    Yagi, Kota
    Nakamura, Wataru
    Saruta, Masanobu
    Nukaya, Takuhisa
    Takenaka, Masashi
    Zennami, Kenji
    Ichino, Manabu
    Sasaki, Hitomi
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)