Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning

被引:2
|
作者
Montesano, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Lazaridis, Georgios [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ometto, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Crabb, David P. [1 ]
Garway-Heath, David F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
[3] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[4] UCL, Ctr Med Image Comp, London, England
[5] City Univ London, Northampton Sq, London EC1V 0HB, England
来源
关键词
automated perimetry; artificial intelligence; optical coherence tomography; glaucoma; structure-function; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; FULL THRESHOLD; VARIABILITY; LOCATIONS; DEFECTS; ZEST;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.12.10.10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the performance of a perimetric strategy using structure-function predictions from a deep learning (DL) model. Methods: Visual field test-retest data from 146 eyes (75 patients) with glaucoma with (median [5th-95th percentile]) 10 [7, 10] tests per eye were used. Structure-function predictions were generated with a previously described DL model using cicumpapillary optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Structurally informed prior distributions were built grouping the observed measured sensitivities for each predicted value and recalculated for each subject with a leave -one -out approach. A zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) strategy was used for the simulations (1000 per eye). Groundtruth sensitivities for each eye were the medians of the test-retest values. Two variations of ZEST were compared in terms of speed (average total number of presentations [NP] per eye) and accuracy (average mean absolute error [MAE] per eye), using either a combination of normal and abnormal thresholds (ZEST) or the calculated structural distributions (S -ZEST) as prior information. Two additional versions of these strategies employing spatial correlations were tested. Results: S -ZEST was significantly faster, with a mean average NP of 213.87 (SD = 28.18), than ZEST, with a mean average NP of 255.65 (SD = 50.27) (P < 0.001). The average MAE was smaller for S -ZEST (1.98; SD = 2.37) than ZEST (2.43; SD = 2.69) (P < 0.001). Spatial correlations further improved both strategies (P < 0.001), but the differences between ZEST and S -ZEST remained significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: DL structure-function predictions can significantly improve perimetric tests. Translational Relevance: DL structure-function predictions from clinically available OCT scans can improve perimetry in glaucoma patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visual Information Management Based on Visual Communication of Deep Learning
    Wang, Wenting
    Pan, Younghwan
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2022, 2022
  • [42] Machine Learning Framework for Improving Accuracy of Probe Speed Data
    Lan Phuong Uong
    Adu-Gyamfi, Yaw
    Zhao, Mo
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [43] Correction to: Automatic differentiation of Glaucoma visual field from non-glaucoma visual field using deep convolutional neural network
    Fei Li
    Zhe Wang
    Guoxiang Qu
    Diping Song
    Ye Yuan
    Yang Xu
    Kai Gao
    Guangwei Luo
    Zegu Xiao
    Dennis S. C. Lam
    Hua Zhong
    Yu Qiao
    Xiulan Zhang
    BMC Medical Imaging, 19
  • [44] Improving the prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma using spatial processing
    Crabb, DP
    Fitzke, FW
    McNaught, AI
    Edgar, DF
    Hitchings, RA
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (03) : 517 - 524
  • [45] Use of bifemelane hydrochloride in improving and maintaining the visual field of patients with glaucoma
    Shigemitsu, T
    Majima, Y
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 18 (01) : 106 - 113
  • [46] Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey Visual Field testing in patients with glaucoma
    Hawkins, AS
    Szlyk, JP
    Ardickas, Z
    Alexander, KR
    Wilensky, JT
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2003, 12 (02) : 134 - 138
  • [47] Improving information extraction from visual field data
    Normando, E. M.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2018, 96 : 90 - 90
  • [48] ANALYSIS OF PROGRESSIVE CHANGE IN AUTOMATED VISUAL-FIELD TESTING IN GLAUCOMA
    SMITH, SD
    KATZ, S
    QUIGLEY, HA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S219 - S219
  • [49] Esterman Visual Field Testing Using a Virtual Reality Headset in Glaucoma
    Sharma, Meghan
    Savatovsky, Eleonore
    Huertas, Laura
    O'Brien, Robert
    Grajewski, Alana
    Bitrian, Elena
    OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE, 2024, 4 (05):
  • [50] Glaucoma screening by optometrists: positive predictive value of visual field testing
    Newman, DK
    Anwar, S
    Jordan, K
    EYE, 1998, 12 (6) : 921 - 924