Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning

被引:2
|
作者
Montesano, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Lazaridis, Georgios [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ometto, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Crabb, David P. [1 ]
Garway-Heath, David F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
[3] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[4] UCL, Ctr Med Image Comp, London, England
[5] City Univ London, Northampton Sq, London EC1V 0HB, England
来源
关键词
automated perimetry; artificial intelligence; optical coherence tomography; glaucoma; structure-function; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; FULL THRESHOLD; VARIABILITY; LOCATIONS; DEFECTS; ZEST;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.12.10.10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the performance of a perimetric strategy using structure-function predictions from a deep learning (DL) model. Methods: Visual field test-retest data from 146 eyes (75 patients) with glaucoma with (median [5th-95th percentile]) 10 [7, 10] tests per eye were used. Structure-function predictions were generated with a previously described DL model using cicumpapillary optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Structurally informed prior distributions were built grouping the observed measured sensitivities for each predicted value and recalculated for each subject with a leave -one -out approach. A zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) strategy was used for the simulations (1000 per eye). Groundtruth sensitivities for each eye were the medians of the test-retest values. Two variations of ZEST were compared in terms of speed (average total number of presentations [NP] per eye) and accuracy (average mean absolute error [MAE] per eye), using either a combination of normal and abnormal thresholds (ZEST) or the calculated structural distributions (S -ZEST) as prior information. Two additional versions of these strategies employing spatial correlations were tested. Results: S -ZEST was significantly faster, with a mean average NP of 213.87 (SD = 28.18), than ZEST, with a mean average NP of 255.65 (SD = 50.27) (P < 0.001). The average MAE was smaller for S -ZEST (1.98; SD = 2.37) than ZEST (2.43; SD = 2.69) (P < 0.001). Spatial correlations further improved both strategies (P < 0.001), but the differences between ZEST and S -ZEST remained significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: DL structure-function predictions can significantly improve perimetric tests. Translational Relevance: DL structure-function predictions from clinically available OCT scans can improve perimetry in glaucoma patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Opportunities for Improving Glaucoma Clinical Trials via Deep Learning-Based Identification of Patients with Low Visual Field Variability
    Wang, Ruolin
    Bradley, Chris
    Herbert, Patrick
    Hou, Kaihua
    Hager, Gregory D.
    Breininger, Katharina
    Unberath, Mathias
    Ramulu, Pradeep
    Yohannan, Jithin
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2024, 7 (03): : 222 - 231
  • [12] On the accuracy of measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma
    Jansonius, N. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 94 (10) : 1404 - 1405
  • [13] Improving the Accuracy of Species Identification by Combining Deep Learning With Field Occurrence Records
    Sun, Jianqiang
    Futahashi, Ryo
    Yamanaka, Takehiko
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 9
  • [14] Pointwise Visual Field Estimation FromOptical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning
    Hemelings, Ruben
    Elen, Bart
    Barbosa-Breda, Joao
    Bellon, Erwin
    Blaschko, Matthew B.
    De Boever, Patrick
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 11 (08):
  • [15] Visual Field Testing Frequency and Associations in Children with Glaucoma
    Hekmatjah, Natan
    Kumar, Anika
    Yu, Yinxi
    Younessi, David N.
    Han, Ying
    Ying, Gui-Shuang
    Oatts, Julius T.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [16] Test Conditions in Macular Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma
    Eura, Mariko
    Matsumoto, Chota
    Hashimoto, Shigeki
    Okuyama, Sachiko
    Takada, Sonoko
    Nomoto, Hiroki
    Tanabe, Fumi
    Shimomura, Yoshikazu
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2017, 26 (12) : 1101 - 1106
  • [17] The effect of pupillary dilatation on visual field testing in glaucoma
    Salem, Doha G.
    Mourad, Mervat S.
    Hamid, Mahmoud A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 113 (02) : 54 - 68
  • [18] Visual Field Testing Frequency and Associations in Children With Glaucoma
    Hekmatjah, Natan
    Kumar, Anika
    Yu, Yinxi
    Younessi, David N.
    Han, Ying
    Ying, Gui-Shuang
    Oatts, Julius T.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2024, 33 (07) : 499 - 504
  • [19] Reducing Variability in Visual Field Assessment for Glaucoma Through Filtering That Combines Structural and Functional Information
    Deng, Lisha
    Demirel, Shaban
    Gardiner, Stuart K.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (07) : 4593 - 4602
  • [20] Evaluating Visual Search in Glaucoma Using Deep learning
    Mishra, Anoop
    Belcher, Steven
    Anderson, David
    Khazanchi, Deepak
    AMCIS 2020 PROCEEDINGS, 2020,