Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning

被引:2
|
作者
Montesano, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Lazaridis, Georgios [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ometto, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Crabb, David P. [1 ]
Garway-Heath, David F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
[3] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[4] UCL, Ctr Med Image Comp, London, England
[5] City Univ London, Northampton Sq, London EC1V 0HB, England
来源
关键词
automated perimetry; artificial intelligence; optical coherence tomography; glaucoma; structure-function; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; FULL THRESHOLD; VARIABILITY; LOCATIONS; DEFECTS; ZEST;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.12.10.10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the performance of a perimetric strategy using structure-function predictions from a deep learning (DL) model. Methods: Visual field test-retest data from 146 eyes (75 patients) with glaucoma with (median [5th-95th percentile]) 10 [7, 10] tests per eye were used. Structure-function predictions were generated with a previously described DL model using cicumpapillary optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Structurally informed prior distributions were built grouping the observed measured sensitivities for each predicted value and recalculated for each subject with a leave -one -out approach. A zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) strategy was used for the simulations (1000 per eye). Groundtruth sensitivities for each eye were the medians of the test-retest values. Two variations of ZEST were compared in terms of speed (average total number of presentations [NP] per eye) and accuracy (average mean absolute error [MAE] per eye), using either a combination of normal and abnormal thresholds (ZEST) or the calculated structural distributions (S -ZEST) as prior information. Two additional versions of these strategies employing spatial correlations were tested. Results: S -ZEST was significantly faster, with a mean average NP of 213.87 (SD = 28.18), than ZEST, with a mean average NP of 255.65 (SD = 50.27) (P < 0.001). The average MAE was smaller for S -ZEST (1.98; SD = 2.37) than ZEST (2.43; SD = 2.69) (P < 0.001). Spatial correlations further improved both strategies (P < 0.001), but the differences between ZEST and S -ZEST remained significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: DL structure-function predictions can significantly improve perimetric tests. Translational Relevance: DL structure-function predictions from clinically available OCT scans can improve perimetry in glaucoma patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors Associated With Visual Field Testing Reliability in Children With Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma
    Kumar, Anika
    Hekmatjah, Natan
    Yu, Yinxi
    Han, Ying
    Ying, Gui-Shuang
    Oatts, Julius T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 264 : 187 - 193
  • [22] A multi-feature deep learning system to enhance glaucoma severity diagnosis with high accuracy and fast speed
    Xuea, Ying
    Zhu, Jiazhu
    Huang, Xiaoling
    Xuc, Xiaobin
    Li, Xiaojing
    Zhengc, Yameng
    Zhu, Zhijing
    Jin, Kai
    Ye, Juan
    Gong, Wei
    Si, Ke
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 136
  • [23] Evaluating the Accuracy of the Visual Field Index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Mild to Moderate Glaucoma
    Talbot, Renee
    Goldberg, Ivan
    Kelly, Patrick
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 156 (06) : 1272 - 1276
  • [24] Improving Testing of Deep-learning Systems
    Deokuliar H.
    Sangwan R.S.
    Badr Y.
    Srinivasan S.M.
    Queue, 2023, 21 (05):
  • [25] Improving Testing of Deep-Learning Systems
    Deokuliar, Harsh
    Sangwan, Raghvinder S.
    Badr, Yoaukim
    Srinivasan, Satish M.
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2024, 67 (03) : 44 - 48
  • [26] Visual field testing in glaucoma Medicare beneficiaries before surgery
    Coleman, AL
    Yu, F
    Rowe, S
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 112 (03) : 401 - 406
  • [27] How useful is visual field testing in an African glaucoma clinic?
    Lenake, Mpopi
    Cook, Colin
    Mustak, Hamzah
    Du Toit, Nagib
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 1767 - 1771
  • [28] Disparities in Visual Field Testing Frequency Among Subjects With Glaucoma
    Madu, Chisom T.
    Lee, Ting-Fang
    Sohn, Ashley
    Hu, Jiyuan
    Matayev, Rachel
    Paranjpe, Vikram
    Fam, Jonathan
    Wronka, Andrew
    Kim, Eleanore T.
    Zambrano, Ronald
    Wollstein, Gadi
    Schuman, Joel S.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 13 (04):
  • [29] Improving biosensor accuracy and speed using dynamic signal change and theory-guided deep learning
    Zhang, Junru
    Srivatsa, Purna
    Ahmadzai, Fazel Haq
    Liu, Yang
    Song, Xuerui
    Karpatne, Anuj
    Kong, Zhenyu
    Johnson, Blake N.
    BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2024, 246
  • [30] Visual field testing in glaucoma using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Visual field testing in glaucoma using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Algorithm (SITA)
    Tan, Jeremy C. K.
    Yohannan, Jithin
    Ramulu, Pradeep Y.
    Kalloniatis, Michael
    Crabb, David P.
    Crowston, Jonathan
    Phu, Jack
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 70 (01) : 141 - 152