Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning

被引:2
|
作者
Montesano, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Lazaridis, Georgios [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ometto, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Crabb, David P. [1 ]
Garway-Heath, David F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
[3] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[4] UCL, Ctr Med Image Comp, London, England
[5] City Univ London, Northampton Sq, London EC1V 0HB, England
来源
关键词
automated perimetry; artificial intelligence; optical coherence tomography; glaucoma; structure-function; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; FULL THRESHOLD; VARIABILITY; LOCATIONS; DEFECTS; ZEST;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.12.10.10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the performance of a perimetric strategy using structure-function predictions from a deep learning (DL) model. Methods: Visual field test-retest data from 146 eyes (75 patients) with glaucoma with (median [5th-95th percentile]) 10 [7, 10] tests per eye were used. Structure-function predictions were generated with a previously described DL model using cicumpapillary optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Structurally informed prior distributions were built grouping the observed measured sensitivities for each predicted value and recalculated for each subject with a leave -one -out approach. A zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) strategy was used for the simulations (1000 per eye). Groundtruth sensitivities for each eye were the medians of the test-retest values. Two variations of ZEST were compared in terms of speed (average total number of presentations [NP] per eye) and accuracy (average mean absolute error [MAE] per eye), using either a combination of normal and abnormal thresholds (ZEST) or the calculated structural distributions (S -ZEST) as prior information. Two additional versions of these strategies employing spatial correlations were tested. Results: S -ZEST was significantly faster, with a mean average NP of 213.87 (SD = 28.18), than ZEST, with a mean average NP of 255.65 (SD = 50.27) (P < 0.001). The average MAE was smaller for S -ZEST (1.98; SD = 2.37) than ZEST (2.43; SD = 2.69) (P < 0.001). Spatial correlations further improved both strategies (P < 0.001), but the differences between ZEST and S -ZEST remained significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: DL structure-function predictions can significantly improve perimetric tests. Translational Relevance: DL structure-function predictions from clinically available OCT scans can improve perimetry in glaucoma patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LEARNING EFFECTS IN VISUAL-FIELD TESTING IN GLAUCOMA SUSPECTS, PREPERIMETRIC GLAUCOMA, AND GLAUCOMA PATIENTS
    JUNEMANN, A
    HORN, F
    BUDDE, W
    KORTH, M
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S337 - S337
  • [2] Improving Visual Field Examination of the Macula Using Structural Information
    Montesano, Giovanni
    Rossetti, Luca M.
    Allegrini, Davide
    Romano, Mario R.
    Crabb, David P.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (06):
  • [3] Multimodal Deep Learning Model of Predicting Future Visual Field for Glaucoma Patients
    Pham, Quang T. M.
    Han, Jong Chul
    Park, Do Young
    Shin, Jitae
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 19049 - 19058
  • [4] Improving perimetric examination of the macular visual field using structural information
    Montesano, Giovanni
    Modarelli, Antonio
    Rossetti, Luca Mario
    Crabb, David P.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [5] Comparison of Structural, Functional, Tonometric, and Visual Acuity Testing for Glaucoma A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study
    Kumar, Rajesh S.
    Ramgopal, B.
    Rackenchath, Mahalakshmi, V
    Devi, Sathi A., V
    Mannil, Suria S.
    Nagaraj, Sriharsha
    Moe, Caitlin A.
    Wittberg, Dionna M.
    O'Brien, Kieran S.
    Stamper, Robert L.
    Keenan, Jeremy D.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (03): : 345 - 352
  • [6] Multifocal pupillographic visual field testing in glaucoma
    Maddess, Ted
    Bedford, Suzanne M.
    Goh, Xin-Lin
    James, Andrew C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 37 (07): : 678 - 686
  • [7] Big data in visual field testing for glaucoma
    Pham, Alex T.
    Pan, Annabelle A.
    Yohannan, Jithin
    TAIWAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 14 (03) : 289 - +
  • [8] Visual field testing for the detection and management of glaucoma
    Henson, David
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 : 269 - 269
  • [9] Recent developments in visual field testing for glaucoma
    Wu, Zhichao
    Medeiros, Felipe A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [10] Improving the detection of visual field progression in glaucoma using fused data from visual field testing and optical coherence tomography
    Li, Yan
    Eizenman, Moshe
    Shi, Runjie Bill
    Buys, Yvonne M.
    Trope, Graham E.
    Wong, Willy
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)