Dosimetric Evaluation of Radiation Treatment Planning for Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique Using Monte Carlo Simulation

被引:1
|
作者
Shende, Ravindra [1 ,2 ]
Dhoble, S. J. [2 ]
Gupta, Gourav [1 ]
机构
[1] Balco Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] RTM Nagpur Univ, Dept Phys, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Dosimetric evaluation; Monte Carlo; PRIMO simulation; radiation planning; ANISOTROPIC ANALYTICAL ALGORITHM; LUNG EQUIVALENT HETEROGENEITIES; DOSE CALCULATION; PHOTON; CONFORMITY; INDEX; MODEL;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.jmp_4_23
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo (MC) techniques have been recognized as the gold standard for the simulation of radiation transport in radiotherapy. The aim of the study is to perform dosimetric evaluation of Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) radiation treatment planning using MC simulation approach. The geometrical source modeling and simulation of 6 MV Flattening Filter Free (FFF)beam from TrueBeam linear accelerator have been carried out to simulate Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans using MC simulation software PRIMO. All the SIB plans have been generated using VMAT techniques for patients with locally advanced postoperative head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma in Eclipse Treatment Planning System ( TPS) retrospectively. TPS plans have been compared against their respective MC-simulated plans in PRIMO. The quality assessments of plans have been performed using several dose volume parameters, plan quality indices, and methods of gamma analysis. D mean, D-50%, and D (2%) received by planning target volume (PTV), PTV (60), and PTV (52) have been found significantly lower in TPS-generated plans compared to MC-simulated plans. D-100%, D-98%, and D (95%) received by PTV (60) exhibit good agreement. However, PTV (52) shows a significant deviation between TPS and MC plans. The mean organ-at-risk doses have been found significantly lower in TPS plans compared to MC plans. TPS and MC plans have been found in close agreement within gamma acceptance criteria of 3% Dose Difference (DD) and 3 mm Distance to Agreement (DTA). Dose distributions computed using MC simulation techniques are reliable, accurate, and consistent with analytical anisotropic algorithm. Plan quality indices have been found slightly compromised in MC-simulated plans compared with TPS-generated plans appeared to be a true representation of real dose distribution obtained from MC simulation technique. Validation using MC simulation approach provides an independent secondary check for ensuring accuracy of TPS-generated plan.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 306
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An integrated Monte Carlo dosimetric verification system for radiotherapy treatment planning
    Yamamoto, T.
    Mizowaki, T.
    Miyabe, Y.
    Takegawa, H.
    Narita, Y.
    Yano, S.
    Nagata, Y.
    Teshima, T.
    Hiraoka, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (07): : 1991 - 2008
  • [2] Dosimetric evaluation of a monte carlo IMRT treatment planning system with the MIMiC
    Rassiah-Szegedi, P.
    Fuss, M.
    Sheikh-Bagheri, D.
    Szegedi, M.
    Papanikolaoul, N.
    Stathakis, S.
    Salter, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2441 - 2442
  • [3] Dosimetric evaluation of a Monte Carlo IMRT treatment planning system incorporating the MIMiC
    Rassiah-Szegedi, P.
    Fuss, M.
    Sheikh-Bagheri, D.
    Szegedi, M.
    Stathakis, S.
    Lancaster, J.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Salter, B.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (23): : 6931 - 6941
  • [4] Project evaluation using Monte Carlo simulation technique
    Sarfaraz, Ahmad R.
    [J]. 4th International Industrial Simulation Conference 2006, 2006, : 199 - 201
  • [5] Dosimetric evaluation of different treatment techniques for breast cancer with simultaneous integrated boost
    Graydon, S.
    Lang, S.
    Verlaan, S.
    Malla, M.
    Stuessi, A.
    Zamburlini, M.
    Glanzmann, Ch
    Kloeck, S.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (08) : 755 - 755
  • [6] Dosimetric verification of breast IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo method
    Gagne, I.
    Zavgorodni, S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S224 - S225
  • [7] Dosimetric evaluation of lung treatment plans produced by the Prowess Panther system using Monte Carlo simulation
    Luong Thi Oanh
    Duong Thanh Tai
    Truong Thi Hong Loan
    Trinh Hong Minh
    Truong Van Minh
    Chow, James C. L.
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2019, 5 (05):
  • [8] Treatment planning for a small animal using Monte Carlo simulation
    Chow, James C. L.
    Leung, Michael K. K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (12) : 4810 - 4817
  • [9] Dosimetric evaluation of simultaneous integrated boost during stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer
    Yang, Wensha
    Reznik, Robert
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Nissen, Nicholas
    Hendifar, Andrew
    Wachsman, Ashley
    Sandler, Howard
    Tuli, Richard
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [10] MONTE CARLO TREATMENT PLANNING FOR RADIATION THERAPY
    Fernandez-Varea, J. M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S59 - S59