Static couch non-coplanar arc selection optimization for lung SBRT treatment planning

被引:2
|
作者
Lincoln, John D. [1 ]
MacDonald, R. Lee [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Syme, Alasdair [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thomas, Christopher G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Phys & Atmospher Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Nova Scotia Hlth, Dept Med Phys, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Radiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2023年 / 68卷 / 15期
关键词
non-coplanar; radiotherapy; optimization; SBRT; SABR; extra-cranial; stereotactic; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; IMRT; CANCER; CONFORMITY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ace23f
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Non-coplanar arc geometry optimizations that take advantage of beam's eye view (BEV) geometric overlap information have been proven to reduce dose to healthy organs-at-risk (OARs). Recently, a metric called mean arc distance (MAD) has been developed that quantifies the arc geometry sampling of 4 & pi; space. The purpose of this research is to combine improved BEV overlap information with MAD to generate static couch lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans deliverable on a C-arm linear accelerator. Approach. An algorithm utilizing the Moller-Trumbore ray-triangle intersection method was employed to compute a cost surrogate for dose to overlapping OARs using distances interpolated onto a PDD. Cost was combined with MAD for 100 000 random combinations of arc trajectories. A pathfinding algorithm for arc selection was created, balancing the contributions of MAD and 4 & pi; cost for the final trajectory. This methodology was evaluated for 18 lung SBRT patients. Cases were also planned with arcs from a clinical treatment template protocol for dosimetric and plan quality comparison. Results were evaluated using dose constraints in the context of RTOG0915. Main results. Five of six OARs had maximum dose reductions when planned with the arc trajectory optimization algorithm. Significant maximum dose reductions were found for esophagus (7.41 & PLUSMN; 0.91 Gy, p = 0.00019), trachea (5.56 & PLUSMN; 1.55 Gy, p = 0.0025), spinal cord (2.87 & PLUSMN; 1.13 Gy, p = 0.039), large bronchus (3.47 & PLUSMN; 1.49 Gy, p = 0.0075), and aorta (3.13 & PLUSMN; 0.99 Gy, p = 0.012). Mean dose to contralateral lung was also significantly reduced (0.50 & PLUSMN; 0.06 Gy, p = 0.00019). There were two significant increases in OAR doses: mean dose to ipsilateral lung (0.40 & PLUSMN; 0.09, p = 0.00086) and V5(Gy) to ipsilateral lung (1.95 & PLUSMN; 0.70%, p = 0.011). Paddick conformity index increased by 0.03 & PLUSMN; 0.02 (p = 0.14), remaining below a limit of 1.2 for both techniques. Significance. Static couch non-coplanar optimization yielded maximum dose reductions to OARs while maintaining target conformity for lung SBRT.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STATIC COUCH NON-COPLANAR ARC SELETION OPTIMIZATION FOR LUNG SBRT TREATMENT PLANNING
    Lincoln, John
    MacDonald, Lee
    Syme, Alasdair
    Thomas, Christopher G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186 : S124 - S124
  • [2] Single Segment Non-coplanar Beam Optimization for Gated Lung SBRT Planning and Delivery
    Partouche, J.
    Wu, T.
    Farrey, K.
    Salama, J. K.
    Yenice, K. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S672 - S673
  • [3] Coplanar and non-coplanar plan optimization in prostate SBRT
    Rossi, L.
    Breedveld, S.
    Al-Uwini, S.
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S176 - S177
  • [4] Dosimetric Evaluation of Non-Coplanar Arcs in VMAT Planning for SBRT Lung Cases: A Planning Study
    Lu, S.
    Gardner, S.
    Doemer, A.
    Chetty, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3407 - 3407
  • [5] Off-target-isocentric approach in non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning for lung SBRT treatments
    Kim, Sangroh
    Tseng, Tzu-Chi
    JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT, 2015, 3 (03): : 215 - 224
  • [6] Coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT facilitate OAR dose sparing in central lung SBRT
    Thomsen, J. B.
    Persson, G. F.
    Aznar, M. C.
    Berthelsen, A. K.
    Specht, L.
    Josipovic, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1021 - S1021
  • [7] Impact of the dose outside the PTV on distant recurrence in coplanar and non-coplanar lung SBRT
    Heng, V. J.
    Diamant, A.
    Chatterjee, A.
    Faria, S.
    Bahig, H.
    Filion, E.
    Doucet, R.
    El Naqa, I.
    Seuntjens, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S531 - S531
  • [8] 4π Non-Coplanar SBRT for Centrally Located or Larger Lung Tumors
    Sheng, K.
    Dong, P.
    Lee, P.
    Ruan, D.
    Long, T.
    Romeijin, E.
    Low, D.
    Kupelian, P.
    Yang, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S122 - S122
  • [9] Evaluation of plan robustness against tumor motion for lung SBRT treatment with non-coplanar VMAT
    Garibaldi, C.
    Bazani, A.
    Pansini, F.
    Emiro, F.
    Trivellato, S.
    Comi, S.
    Piperno, G.
    Ferrari, A.
    Jereczek-Fossa, B. A.
    Cremonesi, M.
    Cattani, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S988 - S989
  • [10] Optimization of couch angles and number of arcs in non-coplanar VMAT for pituitary adenomas
    Limpichotikul, N.
    Yongvithisatid, P.
    Pairat, K.
    Dechsupa, P.
    Changkaew, P.
    Suphaphong, S.
    Stansook, N.
    Savaphatiboon, S.
    Tangboonduangjit, P.
    18TH ASIA-OCEANIA CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS (AOCMP) & 16TH SOUTH-EAST ASIA CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS (SEACOMP), 2019, 1248