Static couch non-coplanar arc selection optimization for lung SBRT treatment planning

被引:2
|
作者
Lincoln, John D. [1 ]
MacDonald, R. Lee [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Syme, Alasdair [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thomas, Christopher G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Phys & Atmospher Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Nova Scotia Hlth, Dept Med Phys, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Radiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2023年 / 68卷 / 15期
关键词
non-coplanar; radiotherapy; optimization; SBRT; SABR; extra-cranial; stereotactic; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; IMRT; CANCER; CONFORMITY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ace23f
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Non-coplanar arc geometry optimizations that take advantage of beam's eye view (BEV) geometric overlap information have been proven to reduce dose to healthy organs-at-risk (OARs). Recently, a metric called mean arc distance (MAD) has been developed that quantifies the arc geometry sampling of 4 & pi; space. The purpose of this research is to combine improved BEV overlap information with MAD to generate static couch lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans deliverable on a C-arm linear accelerator. Approach. An algorithm utilizing the Moller-Trumbore ray-triangle intersection method was employed to compute a cost surrogate for dose to overlapping OARs using distances interpolated onto a PDD. Cost was combined with MAD for 100 000 random combinations of arc trajectories. A pathfinding algorithm for arc selection was created, balancing the contributions of MAD and 4 & pi; cost for the final trajectory. This methodology was evaluated for 18 lung SBRT patients. Cases were also planned with arcs from a clinical treatment template protocol for dosimetric and plan quality comparison. Results were evaluated using dose constraints in the context of RTOG0915. Main results. Five of six OARs had maximum dose reductions when planned with the arc trajectory optimization algorithm. Significant maximum dose reductions were found for esophagus (7.41 & PLUSMN; 0.91 Gy, p = 0.00019), trachea (5.56 & PLUSMN; 1.55 Gy, p = 0.0025), spinal cord (2.87 & PLUSMN; 1.13 Gy, p = 0.039), large bronchus (3.47 & PLUSMN; 1.49 Gy, p = 0.0075), and aorta (3.13 & PLUSMN; 0.99 Gy, p = 0.012). Mean dose to contralateral lung was also significantly reduced (0.50 & PLUSMN; 0.06 Gy, p = 0.00019). There were two significant increases in OAR doses: mean dose to ipsilateral lung (0.40 & PLUSMN; 0.09, p = 0.00086) and V5(Gy) to ipsilateral lung (1.95 & PLUSMN; 0.70%, p = 0.011). Paddick conformity index increased by 0.03 & PLUSMN; 0.02 (p = 0.14), remaining below a limit of 1.2 for both techniques. Significance. Static couch non-coplanar optimization yielded maximum dose reductions to OARs while maintaining target conformity for lung SBRT.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NON-COPLANAR, ADAPTIVE, LUNG PATIENT TREATMENT PLANNING ON A LOW-COST, KILOVOLTAGE, ISOCENTRIC RADIOTHERAPY (KVIRT) SYSTEM
    O'Connell, Jericho
    Bazalova-Carter, Magdalena
    Weil, Michael
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186 : S5 - S6
  • [42] On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT
    Rossi, Linda
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Voet, Peter W. J.
    Lanconelli, Nico
    Aluwini, Shafak
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (17): : 5441 - 5458
  • [43] Comparison of Coplanar and Non-Coplanar Intensity Modulated Arc Techniques for Treatment of Intracranial Multi-Focal Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Wang, Z.
    Kirkpatrick, J.
    Chang, Z.
    Cai, J.
    Zhuang, T.
    Yin, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3309 - +
  • [44] Dosimetric Differences of VMAT, Non-Coplanar IMRT and IMPT for Treatment Planning of Glioblastoma Multiforme
    Nguyen, T.
    Algan, O.
    Ahmad, S.
    Herman, T.
    Herman, T. De La Fuente
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E330 - E330
  • [45] Increasing Couch and Gantry Trajectory Resolution in Order to Approximate Dynamic Non-Coplanar VMAT
    MacDonald, L.
    Kamerling, C.
    Schatti, A.
    Robar, J.
    Thomas, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [46] Dosimetric Comparison of Coplanar and Non-Coplanar IMRT Plans for Peripheral Lung Lesion
    Kang, J.
    Zhang, S.
    Philbrook, S.
    Paul, S.
    Wang, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3558 - 3559
  • [47] Evaluating Treatment Couch Dosimetric Effects in Spine SBRT Treatment Planning
    Winey, B.
    Wolfgang, J.
    Speier, C.
    Crawford, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [48] Dosimetric Effects of Dynamic Jaw Tracking and Collimator Angle Optimization in Non-Coplanar Cranial Arc Radiotherapy
    Knill, Cory
    Loughery, Brian
    Sandhu, Raminder
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2023, 48 (03) : 176 - 180
  • [49] Comparison of Coplanar VMAT, Non-Coplanar VMAT, and elk Treatment Plans
    Woods, K.
    Nguyen, D.
    Tran, A.
    Yu, V.
    Cao, M.
    Sheng, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3530 - 3530
  • [50] Dose plan assessment of coplanar and non-coplanar beam angle optimization algorithms
    Ventura, T.
    Rocha, H.
    Ferreira, B. C.
    Khouri, L.
    Dias, J.
    Lopes, M. C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S764 - S764