Static couch non-coplanar arc selection optimization for lung SBRT treatment planning

被引:2
|
作者
Lincoln, John D. [1 ]
MacDonald, R. Lee [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Syme, Alasdair [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thomas, Christopher G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Phys & Atmospher Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Nova Scotia Hlth, Dept Med Phys, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Radiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2023年 / 68卷 / 15期
关键词
non-coplanar; radiotherapy; optimization; SBRT; SABR; extra-cranial; stereotactic; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; IMRT; CANCER; CONFORMITY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ace23f
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Non-coplanar arc geometry optimizations that take advantage of beam's eye view (BEV) geometric overlap information have been proven to reduce dose to healthy organs-at-risk (OARs). Recently, a metric called mean arc distance (MAD) has been developed that quantifies the arc geometry sampling of 4 & pi; space. The purpose of this research is to combine improved BEV overlap information with MAD to generate static couch lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans deliverable on a C-arm linear accelerator. Approach. An algorithm utilizing the Moller-Trumbore ray-triangle intersection method was employed to compute a cost surrogate for dose to overlapping OARs using distances interpolated onto a PDD. Cost was combined with MAD for 100 000 random combinations of arc trajectories. A pathfinding algorithm for arc selection was created, balancing the contributions of MAD and 4 & pi; cost for the final trajectory. This methodology was evaluated for 18 lung SBRT patients. Cases were also planned with arcs from a clinical treatment template protocol for dosimetric and plan quality comparison. Results were evaluated using dose constraints in the context of RTOG0915. Main results. Five of six OARs had maximum dose reductions when planned with the arc trajectory optimization algorithm. Significant maximum dose reductions were found for esophagus (7.41 & PLUSMN; 0.91 Gy, p = 0.00019), trachea (5.56 & PLUSMN; 1.55 Gy, p = 0.0025), spinal cord (2.87 & PLUSMN; 1.13 Gy, p = 0.039), large bronchus (3.47 & PLUSMN; 1.49 Gy, p = 0.0075), and aorta (3.13 & PLUSMN; 0.99 Gy, p = 0.012). Mean dose to contralateral lung was also significantly reduced (0.50 & PLUSMN; 0.06 Gy, p = 0.00019). There were two significant increases in OAR doses: mean dose to ipsilateral lung (0.40 & PLUSMN; 0.09, p = 0.00086) and V5(Gy) to ipsilateral lung (1.95 & PLUSMN; 0.70%, p = 0.011). Paddick conformity index increased by 0.03 & PLUSMN; 0.02 (p = 0.14), remaining below a limit of 1.2 for both techniques. Significance. Static couch non-coplanar optimization yielded maximum dose reductions to OARs while maintaining target conformity for lung SBRT.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization
    de Pooter, JA
    Essers, M
    Woudstra, E
    Storchi, PJM
    Levendag, PC
    Heijmen, BJM
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S346 - S346
  • [32] Development of a Knowledge Based Automatic Lung IMRT Planning Algorithm with Non-Coplanar Beams
    Zhu, W.
    Wu, Q.
    Yuan, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3544 - 3544
  • [33] Treatment planning comparison of tangential coplanar beams versus non-coplanar beams in whole breast irradiation
    Mazzarella, G.
    Bufacchi, A.
    Bonanni, A.
    Petrone, A.
    Tortoreto, F.
    Guidi, C.
    Caspiani, O.
    Leone, M.
    Capparella, R.
    Marmiroli, L.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 165 - 166
  • [34] Non-coplanar VMAT plans for lung SABR to reduce dose to the heart: a planning study
    Kim, Sang-Tae
    An, Hyun Joon
    Kim, Jung-In
    Yoo, Jae-Ryong
    Kim, Hak Jae
    Park, Jong Min
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1105):
  • [35] Dosimetric verification in radiosurgery with linac non-coplanar arc beams
    Núñez, L
    Doblado, FS
    Gallardo, MI
    Cutanda, F
    Muñiz, JL
    Delgado, A
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1999, 85 (1-4) : 409 - 412
  • [36] Non-coplanar VMAT combined with non-uniform dose prescription markedly reduces lung dose in breath-hold lung SBRT
    Fleckenstein, Jens
    Boda-Heggemann, Judit
    Siebenlist, Kerstin
    Gudzheva, Tanya
    Prakofyeva, Natallia
    Lohr, Frank
    Wenz, Frederik
    Simeonova-Chergou, Anna
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 (09) : 815 - 823
  • [37] Development of a beam angle class solution to replace full beam angle optimization in non-coplanar prostate SBRT
    Rossi, L.
    Breedveld, S.
    Aluwini, S.
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S67 - S68
  • [38] COPLANAR AND NON-COPLANAR VMAT ARC SETTING FOR GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME - DOSIMETRIC AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL COMPARISONS
    Moldoveanu, Vanessa
    Dumitrache, Mihai
    Bacinschi, Xenia
    Serbanescu, Luiza
    Anghel, Rodica
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 : 188 - 188
  • [39] A non-coplanar technique for the treatment of pancreatic cancer
    Elder, ES
    Landry, JC
    McGinley, PH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 338 - 338
  • [40] Computerized selection of non-coplanar beams to enhance coplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Bijman, R.
    Leitao, J.
    Sharfo, A. W.
    Brus, Y.
    Heijmen, B.
    Rossi, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S358 - S359