Examining the diet quality of Canadian adults and the alignment of Canadian front-of-pack labelling regulations with other front-of-pack labelling systems and dietary guidelines

被引:5
|
作者
Lee, Jennifer J. [1 ]
Ahmed, Mavra [1 ,2 ]
Julia, Chantal [3 ,4 ]
Ng, Alena Praneet [1 ]
Paper, Laura [3 ,5 ]
Lou, Wendy Y. [6 ]
L'Abbe, Mary R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Dept Nutr Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Joannah & Brian Lawson Ctr Child Nutr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Paris CRESS, Sorbonne Paris Nord Univ, INRAE, INSERM,CNAM,Nutr Epidemiol Res Team EREN,Epidemiol, Bobigny, France
[4] Avicenne Hosp, AP HP, Publ Hlth Dept, Bobigny, France
[5] French Publ Hlth Agcy, Sante Publ France, Nutr Epidemiol Surveillance Team ESEN, Bobigny, France
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Biostat Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
front-of-pack; FOPL; dietary patterns; nutrient profiling; HEFI; Nutri-score; DASH; DCCP; NUTRIENT PROFILING SYSTEM; PROSPECTIVE ASSOCIATION; INDEX; STANDARDS; PATTERNS; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1168745
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionCanada promulgated mandatory front-of-pack labelling (FOPL) regulations in 2022, requiring pre-packaged foods meeting and/or exceeding recommended thresholds for nutrients-of-concern (i.e., saturated fat, sodium, sugars) to display a "high-in" nutrition symbol. However, there is limited evidence on how Canadian FOPL (CAN-FOPL) regulations compare to other FOPL systems and dietary guidelines. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to examine the diet quality of Canadians using the CAN-FOPL dietary index system and its alignment with other FOPL systems and dietary guidelines. MethodsNationally representative dietary data from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition survey (n = 13,495) was assigned dietary index scores that underpin CAN-FOPL, Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice (DCCP) Guidelines, Nutri-score, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and Canada's Food Guide (Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 [HEFI-2019]). Diet quality was examined by assessing linear trends of nutrient intakes across quintile groups of CAN-FOPL dietary index scores. The alignment of CAN-FOPL dietary index system compared with other dietary index systems, with HEFI as the reference standard, was examined using Pearson's correlations and k statistics. ResultsThe mean [95% CI] dietary index scores (range: 0-100) for CAN-FOPL, DCCP, Nutri-score, DASH, and HEFI-2019 were 73.0 [72.8, 73.2], 64.2 [64.0, 64.3], 54.9 [54.7, 55.1], 51.7 [51.4, 51.9], and 54.3 [54.1, 54.6], respectively. Moving from the "least healthy" to the "most healthy" quintile in the CAN-FOPL dietary index system, intakes of protein, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, and potassium increased, while intakes of energy, saturated fat, total and free sugars, and sodium decreased. CAN-FOPL showed moderate association with DCCP (r = 0.545, p < 0.001), Nutri-score (r = 0.444, p < 0.001), and HEFI-2019 (r = 0.401, p < 0.001), but poor association with DASH (r = 0.242, p < 0.001). Slight to fair agreement was seen between quintile combinations of CAN-FOPL and all dietary index scores (k = 0.05-0.38). DiscussionOur findings show that CAN-FOPL rates the dietary quality of Canadian adults to be healthier than other systems. The disagreement between CAN-FOPL with other systems suggest a need to provide additional guidance to help Canadians select and consume 'healthier' options among foods that would not display a front-of-pack nutrition symbol.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Consumers' Responses to Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling: Results from a Sample from The Netherlands
    Egnell, Manon
    Talati, Zenobia
    Gombaud, Marion
    Galan, Pilar
    Hercberg, Serge
    Pettigrew, Simone
    Julia, Chantal
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [43] A Comparative Analysis of Drivers of Collaborative Governance in Front-of-Pack Food Labelling Policy Processes
    Wood, Amanda
    Tenbensel, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2018, 20 (04): : 404 - 419
  • [44] FRONT-OF-PACK LABELLING AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: REVISITING THE HEALTH STAR RATING SYSTEM
    Lai, Jessica C.
    Becher, Shmuel, I
    [J]. MELBOURNE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [45] Evaluating food front-of-pack labelling: a pan-European survey on consumers' attitudes toward food labelling
    Gregori, Dario
    Ballali, Simonetta
    Voegele, Claus
    Elena Gafare, Claudia
    Stefanini, Giulia
    Widhalm, Kurt
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES AND NUTRITION, 2014, 65 (02) : 177 - 186
  • [46] Front-of-pack nutrition labelling in the European region: identifying what works for governments and consumers
    Kelly, Bridget
    Jewell, Jo
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2019, 22 (06) : 1125 - 1128
  • [47] Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
    Sarda, B.
    Fialon, M.
    Ducrot, P.
    Serry, A. J.
    Galan, P.
    Kesse-Guyot, E.
    Hercberg, S.
    Touvier, M.
    Julia, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32 : III352 - III352
  • [48] Front-of-pack Nutri-Score labelling in France: an evidence-based policy
    Julia, Chantal
    Etile, Fabrice
    Hercberg, Serge
    [J]. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 3 (04): : E164 - E164
  • [49] Improving Nutrition Information in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Implementation of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling
    Al-Jawaldeh, Ayoub
    Rayner, Mike
    Julia, Chantal
    Elmadfa, Ibrahim
    Hammerich, Asmus
    McColl, Karen
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [50] Analysis of Front-of-Pack labelling systems on packaged non-alcoholic beverages for Australian consumer guidance
    Yang, Chun-Shun
    Liu, Xiaoman
    Ford, Pauline
    Leishman, Shaneen
    Schubert, Lisa
    [J]. NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2016, 73 (05) : 410 - 419