Examining the diet quality of Canadian adults and the alignment of Canadian front-of-pack labelling regulations with other front-of-pack labelling systems and dietary guidelines

被引:5
|
作者
Lee, Jennifer J. [1 ]
Ahmed, Mavra [1 ,2 ]
Julia, Chantal [3 ,4 ]
Ng, Alena Praneet [1 ]
Paper, Laura [3 ,5 ]
Lou, Wendy Y. [6 ]
L'Abbe, Mary R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Dept Nutr Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Joannah & Brian Lawson Ctr Child Nutr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Paris CRESS, Sorbonne Paris Nord Univ, INRAE, INSERM,CNAM,Nutr Epidemiol Res Team EREN,Epidemiol, Bobigny, France
[4] Avicenne Hosp, AP HP, Publ Hlth Dept, Bobigny, France
[5] French Publ Hlth Agcy, Sante Publ France, Nutr Epidemiol Surveillance Team ESEN, Bobigny, France
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Biostat Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
front-of-pack; FOPL; dietary patterns; nutrient profiling; HEFI; Nutri-score; DASH; DCCP; NUTRIENT PROFILING SYSTEM; PROSPECTIVE ASSOCIATION; INDEX; STANDARDS; PATTERNS; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1168745
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionCanada promulgated mandatory front-of-pack labelling (FOPL) regulations in 2022, requiring pre-packaged foods meeting and/or exceeding recommended thresholds for nutrients-of-concern (i.e., saturated fat, sodium, sugars) to display a "high-in" nutrition symbol. However, there is limited evidence on how Canadian FOPL (CAN-FOPL) regulations compare to other FOPL systems and dietary guidelines. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to examine the diet quality of Canadians using the CAN-FOPL dietary index system and its alignment with other FOPL systems and dietary guidelines. MethodsNationally representative dietary data from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition survey (n = 13,495) was assigned dietary index scores that underpin CAN-FOPL, Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice (DCCP) Guidelines, Nutri-score, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and Canada's Food Guide (Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 [HEFI-2019]). Diet quality was examined by assessing linear trends of nutrient intakes across quintile groups of CAN-FOPL dietary index scores. The alignment of CAN-FOPL dietary index system compared with other dietary index systems, with HEFI as the reference standard, was examined using Pearson's correlations and k statistics. ResultsThe mean [95% CI] dietary index scores (range: 0-100) for CAN-FOPL, DCCP, Nutri-score, DASH, and HEFI-2019 were 73.0 [72.8, 73.2], 64.2 [64.0, 64.3], 54.9 [54.7, 55.1], 51.7 [51.4, 51.9], and 54.3 [54.1, 54.6], respectively. Moving from the "least healthy" to the "most healthy" quintile in the CAN-FOPL dietary index system, intakes of protein, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, and potassium increased, while intakes of energy, saturated fat, total and free sugars, and sodium decreased. CAN-FOPL showed moderate association with DCCP (r = 0.545, p < 0.001), Nutri-score (r = 0.444, p < 0.001), and HEFI-2019 (r = 0.401, p < 0.001), but poor association with DASH (r = 0.242, p < 0.001). Slight to fair agreement was seen between quintile combinations of CAN-FOPL and all dietary index scores (k = 0.05-0.38). DiscussionOur findings show that CAN-FOPL rates the dietary quality of Canadian adults to be healthier than other systems. The disagreement between CAN-FOPL with other systems suggest a need to provide additional guidance to help Canadians select and consume 'healthier' options among foods that would not display a front-of-pack nutrition symbol.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective
    Pulker, Claire Elizabeth
    Trapp, Georgina S. A.
    Scott, Jane Anne
    Pollard, Christina Mary
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [32] Are foods 'healthy' or 'healthier'? Front-of-pack labelling and the concept of healthiness applied to foods
    Julia, Chantal
    Fialon, Morgane
    Galan, Pilar
    Deschasaux-Tanguy, Melanie
    Andreeva, Valentina A.
    Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
    Touvier, Mathilde
    Hercberg, Serge
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2022, 127 (06) : 948 - 952
  • [33] Trade, standards and politics: global pressures on front-of-pack nutrition labelling interventions
    Thow, A. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 : V6 - V6
  • [34] Consumer choice and the role of front-of-pack labelling: the Health Star Rating system
    Maganja, Damian
    Buckett, Kevin
    Stevens, Cherylyn
    Flynn, Elizabeth
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2019, 29 (01):
  • [35] Front-of-pack nutrition labelling in the European Union: a behavioural, legal and political analysis
    Delhomme, Vincent
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2021, 12 (04) : 825 - 848
  • [36] Obesity prevention and personal responsibility: the case of front-of-pack food labelling in Australia
    Magnusson, Roger S.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
  • [37] Obesity prevention and personal responsibility: the case of front-of-pack food labelling in Australia
    Roger S Magnusson
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 10
  • [38] Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market
    Kelly, Bridget
    Hughes, Clare
    Chapman, Kathy
    Louie, Jimmy Chun-Yu
    Dixon, Helen
    Crawford, Jennifer
    King, Lesley
    Daube, Mike
    Slevin, Terry
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 24 (02) : 120 - 129
  • [39] Diet quality, front-of-pack labeling, and lipoprotein particle profiles
    Haslam, Danielle E.
    Mora, Samia
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2024, 395
  • [40] The Effect of Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels and Back-of-Pack Tables on Dietary Quality
    Ronnow, Helene Normann
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (06)