Examining the diet quality of Canadian adults and the alignment of Canadian front-of-pack labelling regulations with other front-of-pack labelling systems and dietary guidelines

被引:5
|
作者
Lee, Jennifer J. [1 ]
Ahmed, Mavra [1 ,2 ]
Julia, Chantal [3 ,4 ]
Ng, Alena Praneet [1 ]
Paper, Laura [3 ,5 ]
Lou, Wendy Y. [6 ]
L'Abbe, Mary R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Dept Nutr Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Joannah & Brian Lawson Ctr Child Nutr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Paris CRESS, Sorbonne Paris Nord Univ, INRAE, INSERM,CNAM,Nutr Epidemiol Res Team EREN,Epidemiol, Bobigny, France
[4] Avicenne Hosp, AP HP, Publ Hlth Dept, Bobigny, France
[5] French Publ Hlth Agcy, Sante Publ France, Nutr Epidemiol Surveillance Team ESEN, Bobigny, France
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Biostat Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
front-of-pack; FOPL; dietary patterns; nutrient profiling; HEFI; Nutri-score; DASH; DCCP; NUTRIENT PROFILING SYSTEM; PROSPECTIVE ASSOCIATION; INDEX; STANDARDS; PATTERNS; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1168745
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionCanada promulgated mandatory front-of-pack labelling (FOPL) regulations in 2022, requiring pre-packaged foods meeting and/or exceeding recommended thresholds for nutrients-of-concern (i.e., saturated fat, sodium, sugars) to display a "high-in" nutrition symbol. However, there is limited evidence on how Canadian FOPL (CAN-FOPL) regulations compare to other FOPL systems and dietary guidelines. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to examine the diet quality of Canadians using the CAN-FOPL dietary index system and its alignment with other FOPL systems and dietary guidelines. MethodsNationally representative dietary data from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition survey (n = 13,495) was assigned dietary index scores that underpin CAN-FOPL, Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice (DCCP) Guidelines, Nutri-score, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and Canada's Food Guide (Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 [HEFI-2019]). Diet quality was examined by assessing linear trends of nutrient intakes across quintile groups of CAN-FOPL dietary index scores. The alignment of CAN-FOPL dietary index system compared with other dietary index systems, with HEFI as the reference standard, was examined using Pearson's correlations and k statistics. ResultsThe mean [95% CI] dietary index scores (range: 0-100) for CAN-FOPL, DCCP, Nutri-score, DASH, and HEFI-2019 were 73.0 [72.8, 73.2], 64.2 [64.0, 64.3], 54.9 [54.7, 55.1], 51.7 [51.4, 51.9], and 54.3 [54.1, 54.6], respectively. Moving from the "least healthy" to the "most healthy" quintile in the CAN-FOPL dietary index system, intakes of protein, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, and potassium increased, while intakes of energy, saturated fat, total and free sugars, and sodium decreased. CAN-FOPL showed moderate association with DCCP (r = 0.545, p < 0.001), Nutri-score (r = 0.444, p < 0.001), and HEFI-2019 (r = 0.401, p < 0.001), but poor association with DASH (r = 0.242, p < 0.001). Slight to fair agreement was seen between quintile combinations of CAN-FOPL and all dietary index scores (k = 0.05-0.38). DiscussionOur findings show that CAN-FOPL rates the dietary quality of Canadian adults to be healthier than other systems. The disagreement between CAN-FOPL with other systems suggest a need to provide additional guidance to help Canadians select and consume 'healthier' options among foods that would not display a front-of-pack nutrition symbol.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aligning front-of-pack labelling with dietary guidelines: including whole grains in the health star rating
    Byron, Caitlin
    Kissock, Katrina R.
    Barrett, Eden M.
    Beck, Eleanor J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024, 63 (06) : 2025 - 2033
  • [22] Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: are multiple formats a problem for consumers?
    Draper, Alizon K.
    Adamson, Ashley J.
    Clegg, Sue
    Malam, Sally
    Rigg, Malcolm
    Duncan, Sue
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 23 (03): : 517 - 521
  • [23] The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children
    Pettigrew, Simone
    Talati, Zenobia
    Miller, Caroline
    Dixon, Helen
    Kelly, Bridget
    Ball, Kylie
    [J]. APPETITE, 2017, 109 : 115 - 123
  • [24] Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling Schemes: Where Are We Now?
    Zampelas, Antonis
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [25] Global Governance of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling: A Qualitative Analysis
    Thow, Anne Marie
    Jones, Alexandra
    Schneider, Carmen Huckel
    Labonte, Ronald
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [26] An international, science-based benchmark for front-of-pack labelling
    Seidell, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2007, 51 : 52 - 52
  • [27] Research and lobbying conflicting on the issue of a front-of-pack nutrition labelling in France
    Chantal Julia
    Serge Hercberg
    [J]. Archives of Public Health, 74 (1)
  • [28] Research and lobbying conflicting on the issue of a front-of-pack nutrition labelling in France
    Julia, Chantal
    Hercberg, Serge
    [J]. Archives of Public Health, 2016, 74
  • [29] Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: time for the EU to adopt a harmonized scheme
    Gokani, Nikhil
    Garde, Amandine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33 (05): : 751 - 752
  • [30] SIMPLIFICATION OF THE HEALTH STAR RATING FRONT-OF-PACK NUTRITION LABELLING SYSTEM
    Peters, Sanne
    Dunford, Elizabeth
    Jones, Alexandra
    Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
    Taylor, Fraser
    Woodward, Mark
    Neal, Bruce
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2017, 71 : 656 - 657