Correlation between mandibular anatomy and bad split occurrence during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a three-dimensional study

被引:2
|
作者
Telha, Wael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Abotaleb, Bassam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bi, Rui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Songsong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, State Key Lab Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Orthognathic surgery; Sagittal split osteotomy; Bad split fracture; Anatomical landmarks; Intraoperative complication; INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MEDIAL OSTEOTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04665-w
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to find out the correlation between different anatomical parameters of the mandible and the occurrence of a bad split in patients who had undergone bilateral split sagittal ramus osteotomy (BSSRO). Materials and method At both the distal roots of the first molar (1) and the retromolar area (2), we measured the distance from the buccal margin of the inferior dental canal (IDC) to the buccal margin of the cortical bone (MCBC), the thickness of both buccal cortical (WBCB) and cancellous bone (WBCA), distance from the superior border of IDC to the alveolar crest (MCAC), buccolingual thickness (BLT), and thickness of cancellous bone (WCA). At the ramus, the distances between the sigmoid notch to the upper part of the lingula (SL) and the inferior border of the mandible (SIBM), the thickness of the ramus at the level of the lingula (BLTR), and the anteroposterior width of the ramus (APWR) were measured. The paired and independent t-tests were used when applicable, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results MCBC1 showed a significant difference between bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.037). Both WBCA1 and WBCA2 show the same significant difference (P = 0.023, 0.024). Similarly, WCA1 and WCA2 showed a statistical difference between the bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.027, 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the compared sides of WBCB1, WBCB2, MCAC1, MCAC2, SIBM, APWR, SL, and BLTR. Conclusion Narrow space between IDC and the buccal cortical margin, along with the decrease in the thickness of both buccal cancellous bone and total cancellous bone at the inferior border of the mandible along the course of SSRO, has been implicated in the occurrence of bad split intraoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1042
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Ylikontiola, L
    Kinnunen, J
    Oikarinen, K
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (11) : 1234 - 1239
  • [42] Long-term stability of mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Paunonen, Jaakko
    Helminen, Mika
    Peltomaki, Timo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (09) : 1421 - 1426
  • [43] AVAILABILITY OF AUTOLOGOUS TRANSFUSION IN BILATERAL SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY FOR MANDIBULAR PROGNATHISM
    Han, Sang-Jeong
    Zang, Ju-Min
    Oh, Han-Seok
    Lee, Hae-Kyung
    Lee, Jeong-Nyeo
    Lee, Su-Woon
    Park, Sang-Jun
    Kim, Woo-Hyung
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2007, 33 (05) : 524 - 529
  • [44] Three-Dimensional Geometric Morphometry of Facial Soft Tissue Changes After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Al Bougha, Safieh
    Nakano, Hiroyuki
    Yasuda, Kousuke
    Suzuki, Kei
    Yamada, Tomohiro
    Takahashi, Ichiro
    Ueno, Takaaki
    Mori, Yoshihide
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (01) : E92 - E97
  • [45] Cortical bone thickness of the mandibular canal and implications for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a cadaveric study
    Promma, L.
    Sakulsak, N.
    Putiwat, P.
    Amarttayakong, P.
    Iamsaard, S.
    Trakulsuk, H.
    Hirunyakorn, K.
    Suarbua, S.
    Wattanaraeungchai, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 46 (05) : 572 - 577
  • [46] The study of stability of absorbable internal fixation after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramal osteotomy
    Choi, Byoung-Hwan
    Park, Su-Won
    Jang, Soo-Mi
    Son, Han-Na
    Park, Bong-Chan
    Son, Jang-Ho
    Cho, Yeong-Cheol
    Sung, Iel-Yong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2010, 36 (04) : 255 - 261
  • [47] Three-dimensional mandibular change after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a semirigid sliding plate system for fixation of a mandibular setback surgery
    Ghang, Moon-Ho
    Kim, Hyung-Min
    You, Jun-Young
    Kim, Byoung-Ho
    Choi, Jae-Pyong
    Kim, Soo-Ho
    Choung, Pill-Hoon
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 115 (02): : 157 - 166
  • [48] TEMPORALIS TENDON RELEASE DURING MANDIBULAR SAGITTAL RAMUS SPLIT OSTEOTOMY
    MARSHALL, MW
    DAVIS, WH
    KAMINISHI, RM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (08) : 885 - 887
  • [49] Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy
    Teerijoki-Oksa, T
    Jääskeläinen, SK
    Forssell, K
    Forssell, H
    Vähätalo, K
    Tammisalo, T
    Virtanen, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 31 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [50] Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy
    Chrcanovic B.R.
    Freire-Maia B.
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012, 16 (1) : 19 - 27