Correlation between mandibular anatomy and bad split occurrence during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a three-dimensional study

被引:2
|
作者
Telha, Wael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Abotaleb, Bassam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bi, Rui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Songsong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, State Key Lab Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Orthognathic surgery; Sagittal split osteotomy; Bad split fracture; Anatomical landmarks; Intraoperative complication; INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MEDIAL OSTEOTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04665-w
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to find out the correlation between different anatomical parameters of the mandible and the occurrence of a bad split in patients who had undergone bilateral split sagittal ramus osteotomy (BSSRO). Materials and method At both the distal roots of the first molar (1) and the retromolar area (2), we measured the distance from the buccal margin of the inferior dental canal (IDC) to the buccal margin of the cortical bone (MCBC), the thickness of both buccal cortical (WBCB) and cancellous bone (WBCA), distance from the superior border of IDC to the alveolar crest (MCAC), buccolingual thickness (BLT), and thickness of cancellous bone (WCA). At the ramus, the distances between the sigmoid notch to the upper part of the lingula (SL) and the inferior border of the mandible (SIBM), the thickness of the ramus at the level of the lingula (BLTR), and the anteroposterior width of the ramus (APWR) were measured. The paired and independent t-tests were used when applicable, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results MCBC1 showed a significant difference between bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.037). Both WBCA1 and WBCA2 show the same significant difference (P = 0.023, 0.024). Similarly, WCA1 and WCA2 showed a statistical difference between the bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.027, 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the compared sides of WBCB1, WBCB2, MCAC1, MCAC2, SIBM, APWR, SL, and BLTR. Conclusion Narrow space between IDC and the buccal cortical margin, along with the decrease in the thickness of both buccal cancellous bone and total cancellous bone at the inferior border of the mandible along the course of SSRO, has been implicated in the occurrence of bad split intraoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1042
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular width after mandibular asymmetric setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Kim, Seong-Sik
    Kim, Sung-Hun
    Kim, Yong-Il
    Park, Soo-Byung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2023, 53 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [32] Mandibular remodeling after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for prognathism of the mandible
    Huang, CS
    de Villa, GH
    Lion, EJW
    Chen, YR
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [33] Condylar position and mandibular function after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Hirjak, D.
    Dvoranova, B.
    Reyneke, J. P.
    Machon, M.
    Neff, A.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2020, 121 (06): : 379 - 385
  • [34] Bilateral Sagittal Split Mandibular Ramus Osteotomy Alters the Temporomandibular Joint
    Wang, Xiangshen
    Sun, Xiumei
    Wu, Guomin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (06) : E598 - E600
  • [36] Evaluation of the lower face enlargement following mandibular osteotomy: Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) vs supra basilar sagittal Split Osteotomy (SBSSO)
    Heller, Ugo
    Vacher, Christian
    Loncle, Thierry
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (05)
  • [37] Maintaining the space between the mandibular ramus segments during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy does not influence the stability
    Vamvanij, Natthacha
    Chinpaisarn, Chatchawarn
    Denadai, Rafael
    Seo, Hyung Joon
    Pai, Betty C. J.
    Lin, Hsiu-Hsia
    Lo, Lun-Jou
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 120 (09) : 1768 - 1776
  • [38] MANDIBULAR ANATOMY AS IT RELATES TO RIGID FIXATION OF THE SAGITTAL RAMUS SPLIT OSTEOTOMY - DISCUSSION
    ARDARY, WC
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (03) : 227 - 227
  • [39] Accuracy of computer-assisted design and manufactured three-dimensional device for condylar positioning in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (clinical trial)
    Habib, Aliaa A.
    Sharara, Ahmed A.
    Yousry, Tarek N.
    Swidan, Ahmed O.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 137 (04): : 331 - 337
  • [40] Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review of fracture patterns
    Steenen, S. A.
    Becking, A. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (07) : 887 - 897