Correlation between mandibular anatomy and bad split occurrence during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a three-dimensional study

被引:2
|
作者
Telha, Wael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Abotaleb, Bassam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bi, Rui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Songsong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, State Key Lab Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Orthognathic surgery; Sagittal split osteotomy; Bad split fracture; Anatomical landmarks; Intraoperative complication; INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MEDIAL OSTEOTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04665-w
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to find out the correlation between different anatomical parameters of the mandible and the occurrence of a bad split in patients who had undergone bilateral split sagittal ramus osteotomy (BSSRO). Materials and method At both the distal roots of the first molar (1) and the retromolar area (2), we measured the distance from the buccal margin of the inferior dental canal (IDC) to the buccal margin of the cortical bone (MCBC), the thickness of both buccal cortical (WBCB) and cancellous bone (WBCA), distance from the superior border of IDC to the alveolar crest (MCAC), buccolingual thickness (BLT), and thickness of cancellous bone (WCA). At the ramus, the distances between the sigmoid notch to the upper part of the lingula (SL) and the inferior border of the mandible (SIBM), the thickness of the ramus at the level of the lingula (BLTR), and the anteroposterior width of the ramus (APWR) were measured. The paired and independent t-tests were used when applicable, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results MCBC1 showed a significant difference between bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.037). Both WBCA1 and WBCA2 show the same significant difference (P = 0.023, 0.024). Similarly, WCA1 and WCA2 showed a statistical difference between the bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.027, 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the compared sides of WBCB1, WBCB2, MCAC1, MCAC2, SIBM, APWR, SL, and BLTR. Conclusion Narrow space between IDC and the buccal cortical margin, along with the decrease in the thickness of both buccal cancellous bone and total cancellous bone at the inferior border of the mandible along the course of SSRO, has been implicated in the occurrence of bad split intraoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1042
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pseudoaneurysm in the inferior alveolar artery following a bad split in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    AbuKaraky, A.
    Al Mousa, M.
    Samara, O. A.
    Baqain, Z. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (06) : 798 - 800
  • [22] Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis
    Takahashi, Hiromasa
    Moriyama, Shigeaki
    Furuta, Haruhiko
    Matsunaga, Hisao
    Sakamoto, Yuki
    Kikuta, Toshihiro
    HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2010, 6
  • [23] Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis
    Hiromasa Takahashi
    Shigeaki Moriyama
    Haruhiko Furuta
    Hisao Matsunaga
    Yuki Sakamoto
    Toshihiro Kikuta
    Head & Face Medicine, 6
  • [24] MANDIBULAR RAMUS ANATOMY AS IT RELATES TO THE MEDIAL OSTEOTOMY OF THE SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY
    SMITH, BR
    RAJCHEL, JL
    WAITE, DE
    READ, L
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (02) : 112 - 116
  • [25] The Assessment of Neurosensory Disturbance Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy With Subjective and Three-Dimensional Evaluation
    Iscan, Duygu
    Ozbilen, Elvan Onem
    Ugurlu, Kemal
    Acar, Ahu
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (04) : 1136 - 1142
  • [26] Three-dimensional fracture pattern analysis of the Obwegeser and Dal Pont bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Dreiseidler, T.
    Bergmann, J.
    Zirk, M.
    Rothamel, D.
    Zoeller, J. E.
    Kreppel, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (11) : 1452 - 1458
  • [27] A transoral approach for three-dimensional repositioning of the proximal segment after mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Yagami, K
    Nagumo, M
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (10) : 1256 - 1258
  • [28] MANDIBULAR ANATOMY AS IT RELATES TO RIGID FIXATION OF THE SAGITTAL RAMUS SPLIT OSTEOTOMY
    SMITH, BR
    RAJCHEL, JL
    WAITE, DE
    READ, L
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [29] Presence of mandibular third molars during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy increases the possibility of bad split but not the risk of other post-operative complications
    Verweij, Jop P.
    Mensink, Gertjan
    Fiocco, Marta
    van Merkesteyn, J. P. Richard
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (07) : E359 - E363
  • [30] Trigeminocardiac reflex during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Sugiyama, Satomi
    Iwai, Toshinori
    Honda, Koji
    Mitsudo, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 16 (02) : 782 - 783