Correlation between mandibular anatomy and bad split occurrence during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a three-dimensional study

被引:2
|
作者
Telha, Wael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Abotaleb, Bassam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bi, Rui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Songsong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, State Key Lab Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 14,Sect 3 Renmin Nan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Orthognathic surgery; Sagittal split osteotomy; Bad split fracture; Anatomical landmarks; Intraoperative complication; INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MEDIAL OSTEOTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04665-w
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to find out the correlation between different anatomical parameters of the mandible and the occurrence of a bad split in patients who had undergone bilateral split sagittal ramus osteotomy (BSSRO). Materials and method At both the distal roots of the first molar (1) and the retromolar area (2), we measured the distance from the buccal margin of the inferior dental canal (IDC) to the buccal margin of the cortical bone (MCBC), the thickness of both buccal cortical (WBCB) and cancellous bone (WBCA), distance from the superior border of IDC to the alveolar crest (MCAC), buccolingual thickness (BLT), and thickness of cancellous bone (WCA). At the ramus, the distances between the sigmoid notch to the upper part of the lingula (SL) and the inferior border of the mandible (SIBM), the thickness of the ramus at the level of the lingula (BLTR), and the anteroposterior width of the ramus (APWR) were measured. The paired and independent t-tests were used when applicable, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results MCBC1 showed a significant difference between bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.037). Both WBCA1 and WBCA2 show the same significant difference (P = 0.023, 0.024). Similarly, WCA1 and WCA2 showed a statistical difference between the bad and non-bad split sides (P = 0.027, 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the compared sides of WBCB1, WBCB2, MCAC1, MCAC2, SIBM, APWR, SL, and BLTR. Conclusion Narrow space between IDC and the buccal cortical margin, along with the decrease in the thickness of both buccal cancellous bone and total cancellous bone at the inferior border of the mandible along the course of SSRO, has been implicated in the occurrence of bad split intraoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1042
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation between mandibular anatomy and bad split occurrence during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a three-dimensional study
    Wael Telha
    Bassam Abotaleb
    Jie Zhang
    Rui Bi
    Songsong Zhu
    Nan Jiang
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 1035 - 1042
  • [2] Relationship Between Mandibular Anatomy and the Occurrence of a Bad Split Upon Sagittal Split Osteotomy
    Aarabi, Mohammadali
    Tabrizi, Reza
    Hekmat, Mina
    Shahidi, Shoaleh
    Puzesh, Ayatollah
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (12) : 2508 - 2513
  • [3] Occurrence of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy
    Falter, Bart
    Schepers, Serge
    Vrielinck, Luc
    Lambrichts, Ivo
    Thijs, Herbert
    Politis, Constantinus
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2010, 110 (04): : 430 - 435
  • [4] 1 Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Assessment Following Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
    Al-Housami, Salah Al-Din
    Shawky, Maha
    El-Morsy, Khairy
    Abdel-Ghany, Hassan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (08) : E702 - E706
  • [5] Simple inferior border osteotomy to prevent bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Sugiyama, Satomi
    Iwai, Toshinori
    Honda, Koji
    Mitsudo, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (04) : 2441 - 2442
  • [6] A three-dimensional comparison of the pharyngeal airway after mandibular distraction osteogenesis and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Schneider, Daniel
    Kaemmerer, Peer W.
    Schoen, Gerhard
    Bschorer, Reinhard
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (08) : 1632 - 1637
  • [7] Bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with separators: a retrospective study of 427 patients
    Mensink, Gertjan
    Verweij, Jop P.
    Frank, Michael D.
    Bergsma, J. Eelco
    van Merkesteyn, J. P. Richard
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 51 (06): : 525 - 529
  • [8] Three-dimensional evaluation of lingual split line after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in asymmetric prognathism
    Song, Jae Min
    Kim, Yong Deok
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2014, 40 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [9] Three-dimensional condylar displacement and remodelling in patients with asymmetrical mandibular prognathism following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Abotaleb, B. M.
    Bi, R.
    Liu, Y.
    Jiang, N.
    Telha, W.
    Zhu, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (04) : 509 - 517
  • [10] Does the Presence of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars Increase the Risk of Bad Split Incidence During Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy?
    Eshghpour, Majid
    Labafchi, Ali
    Samieirad, Sahand
    Abrishami, Majid Hosseini
    Nodehi, Elham
    Javan, Abdollah Rashid
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) : 37 - 42